Channel
@zeong
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
543subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001103106745 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @zeong |
| Created | 13 September 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/zeong |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 08:55 | 543 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:18 | 542 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 00:54 | 542 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 27 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
当代盛行的MBTI性格测试、体验主义、“奥德赛时期”“美国梦”等话语，本质都是典型的意识形态主人能指。它们制造出温和的认知致幻效果，预先设定了一套完整、规整、可被分类的主体模板，诱导个体主动认领这套现成的意义叙事，固执地在既定框架中确认自我、固化自我，却彻底回避了主体生成的核心真相。 当下最普遍的伪反思，便是标签化、模板化的自我复盘。很多人依托MBTI、各类性格标签完成所谓的“自我反思”，这并非真正的自我剖析，而是主动将自我塞进社会预制好的“刻板印象分类盒”。这类意识形态框架看似提供了清晰的自我认知，帮人们快速定位自我特质、梳理行为逻辑，实则为个体搭建了一层坚固的防御机制。它用规整、可控、可解释的标签，掩盖了自我中混沌、复杂、无法被定义的未知部分，为人们提供了极致的认知安全感。https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV1Uw9YBzEPF 军备竞赛模型。 攻击与防御的螺旋：当“政治正确”或某种道德高地被…
“你若盛开蝴蝶自来”、“谁痛苦谁改变”、“接受你永远不会被爱的事实”、“向内求，无往不胜”、“构建强大的心理防线，你将坚不可摧”…… 你一定听过类似这样的论调，它们几乎无处不在。其唯一作用只有：自我维稳，和被强摁下去变得更加深层、更加苦不堪言的伪装。 这些诡异的说辞将你所经历的统治压迫的困苦完全归咎于你的个人“修养不足”，当你开始垂下头来进行自我检讨时，一大堆“自助励志专家”蜂拥而至，禅修茶艺、瑜伽密宗、形象管理、灵修操练 …… 争先恐后掏空你的口袋的大师们宣称他们掌握着帮你摆脱困苦的唯一出路。 这些被称为自助文化的“新风口”在算法操纵的性别极化的数字世界里迅速扩张。“自助大师”绝口不提压迫性系统构筑的人际高墙和对人心的摧残，他们只**需要你相信**他们所提供的是针对亲密关系危机的“最佳解决方案” —— 其基于生存主义的个人主义与性别本质主义的“务实性”话术阻断了几乎所有质疑。 这种诡异的现象并不仅仅是数字时代某种拉流量的…
https://2ndbreakfast.audreywatters.com/miseducative-experiences/
https://jxnl.co/writing/2024/06/01/advice-to-young-people/
https://omniharmonic.substack.com/p/transhumanism-wetiko-and-the-parasites
Problem plaguing us, people can't stand on their own two feet anymore We’ve made outsourced thinking feel normal —> Scroll, absorb, agree, repost, move on Have an opinion, and you feel its right, stick to it even though it may not be consensus. https://feifeiwrites.substack.com/p/how-to-start-having-original-thoughts
https://www.vogue.in/content/in-2026-im-no-longer-interested-in-working-on-myself 我们已经对内心世界如此精通，不断翻新自我的房间，世界外部却破败不堪，迫切需要集体行动的时候却要求个人绝对的道德一致性，批判性思维变成了过度思考，自我审查让个性表达像进行风险评估令人筋疲力尽，思考也是一种逃避——把每种心理状态都看做需要解决的问题只会让生活显得狭窄而不是广阔。 https://deepfix.substack.com/p/youre-probably-addicted-to-thinking
https://kristiedegaris.substack.com/p/effort-without-improvemen 带病生存，全职健康
[cc] good read don’t get too absorbed in the cult of self (myself included) #BM https://open.substack.com/pub/quynhxnewsletter/p/the-cult-of-the-self?r=5ybqeq&utm_medium=ios
[cc] #BM Kegan’s Theory of Adult Development However, most of us — about 65% of the general population — never become high functioning ‘adults’, i.e. we never make it past Stage 3 (out of 5 Stages!). We still lack an independent sense of self because so much of what we think, believe, and feel is dependent on how we think others experience us. https://medium.com/@NataliMorad/how-to-be-an-adult-kegans-theory-of-adu…
To seek normalcy is a path to insanity https://x.com/tim_denning/status/2026238418800484446?s=12&t=2q9OLMlaobNlHLewOXT4uA
https://tomstafford.substack.com/p/the-half-life-of-trust #信任
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @zeong. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“个立激群” (@zeong), 543 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zeong.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.