The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 18 months. If they remain inactive for the next 8 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.

Channel
Zen Calls
@zen_calls
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
70subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001530725376 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @zen_calls |
| Description | Anything in this chat is not to be considered as financial advise. We are here to help you make gains on solid investments. Remember to always DYOR! Promos: @Zen_Bro @sparrow_bsc @zen901 |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 21 April 2022— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/zen_calls |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 00:00 | 70 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:41 | 70 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 21 April 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 16
- Videos
- 14
- Links
- 48
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 10s
- Average length
- 10s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
386 reactions across 16 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 154 | 39.9% | |
| 🔥 | 111 | 28.8% | |
| ❤ | 75 | 19.4% | |
| 🥰 | 17 | 4.40% | |
| 👏 | 12 | 3.11% | |
| 🎉 | 7 | 1.81% | |
| 😢 | 6 | 1.55% | |
| 🤩 | 4 | 1.04% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 386reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 April 2022 to 25 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
OK sorry guys I have left this for a while until I have found some gems. I am in contact with a few people who have some amazing projects on the way. Make sure you stay active and keep you notifications on you don't want to miss some of these. Lfg!
Hey guys, market recently has been pretty shit like I touched on a while back, obviously the calls have stopped as most projects that have been approaching us these days are rugs and we’re not the type of people to post things like that. Here at Zen Calls its better we protect you guys at the expense of our activity but we will be back ❤️ If I find anything promising i’ll make sure to post it for you guys.
🔥9👍1
Video, posted without a caption
$100 GIVEAWAY Going to be doing a random giveaway for our best members. Spread the word on this channel and help us gain members and send proof and you will be in for a chance of winning.
❤17👍1
You guys seeing the situation with $Luna? 😳 Right now market is not looking the best thats why our calls have slowed down this much but we will be back with more calls as the market beings to fix up. Safe investing in these times guys
👍11
A good friend of mine just opened his announcement channel. He holds a lot of whitelist (Legit project)/Bnb giveaway They are also known for holding one of the best AMA's in the crypto space. He is holding a giveaway of 50$$$ for new subscribers Join the announcement channel and discussion channel to be part of the giveaway Announcement channel https://t.me/InvestorsClubOfficial Chat room https://t.me/+PU5QkJgsY0Nl…
👍3
Going to be running a shill contest for this channel soon. Get you shilling heads on guys it's going to be a big one. Like I always have said you help us grow we will help you. BE READY AND KEEP NOTIFICATIONS ON!!
👍12❤4
🏆$50 GIVEAWAY Cross-Promotion Top amazing channel🏆 🏆 50$ GIVEAWAY 🏆 💰 25$ EACH CHANNEL 💰 To enter: 1️⃣ Join: @Alphacallz 2️⃣ Join: @zen_calls ✅ Comment "YOUR USERNAME " (eg @crypto)after joining the channels💰 ❎ You need to be subscribed to both channels to be able to win❗️
🔥26❤12👍7🎉1🤩1
Hey guys. We are keeping a look out for good projects to get you into. The whole bsc scene looks kind of bleak right now so we would rather get you all solid play rather than bad tokens. Keep your notifications on guys we are on the hut for giveaways!
👍8👏6❤3🔥1
⚫️ Underwrld BSC ⚪️ 🔥$50 + 3 WL SPOTS ONLY This project looks promising! 1️⃣ Join @UnderwrldBSC 2️⃣ Say “@zen_calls sent me!” 3️⃣ Comment “done” under this post $Underwrld is a Limbo Inspired 2D adventure game based on the BSC network, which allows holders to earn through passive income while enjoying a story based P2E adventure game. Our Presale will be on 3rd May! 🔥WATCH OUR OFFICIAL TRAILER : https://youtu.be/…
🔥45🥰17👍5🤩3
💎 $GEMS LAUNCHED 💎 The hottest launchpad at the moment GemPad is launching their official token $GEMS this Tuesday, 26th of April! 🔥 Contract Address: 0x78Aae7e000Bf6FC98a6b717d5eC8Ef2bcd04F428 BENEFITS OF HOLDING $GEMS 💎 Holding a certain amount of tokens will put you in one of the following tiers: Gold, Platinum or Diamond These tiers will: 💎 Give you advantages to participate in the hottest presales or speci…
👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @zen_calls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 900,683 of 1,212,465entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 7
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 7
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@zen_calls named 7 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 2 posts, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
named in 2 posts, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
named in 1 post, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
named in 1 post, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
named in 1 post, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
named in 1 post, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
named in 1 post, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Zen Calls” (@zen_calls), 70 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zen_calls.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.