Channel
@zemesvejs
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
248subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 2 October 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001687463508 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @zemesvejs |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 2 October 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 28 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 28 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/zemesvejs |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (qwen3.6:35b-a3b, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 28 Oct 2026, 08:26 | 248 | -1 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 11:06 | 249 | +2 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 07:20 | 247 | -1 |
| 7 Oct 2026, 07:54 | 248 | no change |
| 2 Oct 2026, 18:22 | 248 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 11 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (11 June 2026 – 2 October 2026) |
| Views total | 289 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 2 Oct 2026, 18:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
5 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 3 | 60.0% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 40.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 June 2026 to 2 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Vispirms – par jēgu. Jā, es zinu, ka mūsu valsts reāli mums nepieder. Es gan nezinu, kā šo statusu pareizi dēvēt – ne ta’ ūtrupe, ne ta’ okupācija, ne ta’ poligona gatavošana – kaut kas pa vidu visam šim. Un tomēr. . . . . Tas ir noticis ar mūsu neapzinātu piekrišanu! Un tikai mēs paši to varam mainīt, lai cik absurdi tas neliktos tiem, kas čīkst, ka nekam nav jēgas un viss nolemts tur, “augšā” . Jā, “augšā” visu nol…
Signed Marija Sils
Šajā laikā Saeimā palika tikai daži deputāti, kas nepiekrita šai vispārējai vardarbība, un tas ir MANS PAMATS izvēlēties viņus redzēt pie teikšanas atkal. Ja kāds grib palasīt vairāk par to laiku – MI tagad izdod diezgan labi apkopotu informāciju, nav pat īpaši jāmeklē. Tātad, PAR KO: Vienīgā deputāte, kas līdz galam atteicās gan potēties, gan uzrādīt jebkādus medicīnas “kodus”, jebkādi iegūtus tajā laikā bija – Jūl…
Signed Marija Sils
Mans atklātais vēlēšanu biļetens (sanāca gari – var vidu izlaist un lasīt kopsaucēju beigās) Neesmu politikā necik dziļi, un par to priecājos – tas dod iespēju brīvam skatam no malas, kas ar manām Lauka lasīšanas iemaņām mēdz uzrādīt diezgan reālu rezultātu. J a ir interesants mans viedoklis – palasiet un iedvesmojaties, ja ne – dzīvojiet tāpat nost. Rīt daudzi ies uz mūsu valsts vēlēšanām, daudzi neies. . . . un nei…
Signed Marija Sils
Uz Tukumu ir laba sabiedriskā satiksme, bet esiet arī aicināti apvienoties līdzbraukšanai - pieteikumā šo vēlmi lūgums atzīmēt, mēs skatīsimies, kādas būs iespējas Jo mēs varam savest kopā vienā auto jūs tikai tad, ja paši esiet šo vēlmi izteikuši!
Signed Marija Sils
Aiznākamā trešdienā, no 18.00 vakarā aicinu aizvietot gribētājus uz Tukuma klātienes sistēmisko grupu! Paredzēti 2,5 darbi. Aizvietotājiem dalība, kā vienmēr - brīvi sajusta ziedojuma apmērā. Izmantojiet iespēju iekustināt un piekārtot savu Lauku bez sava pieprasījuma. * Pieteikums te: https://forms.gle/yvYENpo1dZPSvrst7
Signed Marija Sils
Manās sistēmiskajās grupās klientu darbi iespējami tiem, kas nāk arī aizvietot vai piedalās Lauka kustināšanas darbnīcās. Par sistēmisko sakārtojumu un Lauka kustināšanas grupām vairāk un tālāk lasiet te: https://www.zemesvejs.lv/pasakumi/seminari/sistemiskie-izvietojumi/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> RIETUMU DIENAS 9.-11. oktobrī (no piektdienas vakara līdz svētdienas vakaram) Talsu novada Uguņos Šamaniskā nometne, kas orient…
Signed Marija Sils
OKTOBRA AKTUALITĀTES manā, Marijas Sils praksē
Signed Marija Sils
Ja nu tomēr pasauli varētu ietekmēt. . . Mēs skatāmies uz notiekošo apkārt un bieži vien nolaižas rokas, redzot, ka mūsu centieni kaut ko mainīt kaut vai savā personīgajā dzīvē beidzas ar neko, un tas mērkaķis liktens atkal izspēlē kādu nesmuku joku. It kā kāda neredzama roka vadītu šo spēli, ko sauc par dzīvi. . . nesaprotot, kā darbojas sistēmiskie procesi, cilvēki vai nu metas cīņā ar tiem (kas ir mazefektīvi), va…
Signed Marija Sils
Tā mēs vakar Uguņos savas vecās bēdas nodedzinājām un Rietumus sveicinājām Paldies, Melita Januša-Rauba par video!
Signed Marija Sils
Kāpēc es ticu, ka sistēmiskais darbs izglābs pasauli 😊 Sāksim ar to, ka pasaule vispār NAV jāglābj, bet lai nu paliek tas provokatīvais virsraksts… Pasaule dzīvo savu dzīvi, reizēm papurina mūs, cilvēkus, kā suns blusas, un katru dienu dāvā mums savus dārgumus, kā tāda burvju feja – tikai mēs tos vai nu nepaņemam, vai nenovērtējam. Tālāk lasi te: https://www.zemesvejs.lv/raksti-1/par-sistemfenomenologiju/par-pasaules…
Signed Marija Sils
Svētdienas priekšpusdienā aicinu iepazīt un piedzīvot sistēmisko metodi manā vadībā burvīgā vietā Talsos! Aicināti gan iesācēji, gan tie, kas jau piedalījušies sistēmiskajās grupās kaut kur. Būs: * Nedaudz zināšanu par to, kā sistēmiskie sakārtojumi veidojas * Kāds praktisks piemērs * Iespēja sajust lauku diagnostiskos īsajos darbiņos - par attiecībām / par savu vietu dzimtā / par resursiem, kas nāk caur tēva vai māt…
Signed Marija Sils
Viss par manām sistēmisko izvietojumu grupām te: https://www.zemesvejs.lv/pasakumi/seminari/sistemiskie-izvietojumi/
Signed Marija Sils
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @zemesvejs. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Zemesvējš (Marijas Sils kanāls)” (@zemesvejs), 248 subscribers as measured 28 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zemesvejs.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.