Они пытались, но сдались
😭7

Channel
@zelenaya_sosna
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
93subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001416352588 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @zelenaya_sosna |
| Created | 8 March 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/zelenaya_sosna |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Sept 2026, 12:40 | 93 | +1 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 06:34 | 92 | -3 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 04:47 | 95 | +1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 14:16 | 94 | +1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 13:16 | 93 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 13:51 | 93 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
161 reactions across 12 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 54 | 33.5% | |
| ❤🔥 | 39 | 24.2% | |
| 🔥 | 39 | 24.2% | |
| custom 5235508508975177195 | 9 | 5.59% | |
| 😭 | 7 | 4.35% | |
| 😍 | 5 | 3.11% | |
| custom 5897720675640021059 | 4 | 2.48% | |
| ✍ | 3 | 1.86% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 0.621% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 161 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Они пытались, но сдались
😭7
Закончился премиум и я вспомнила, что такое реклама в телеге, отсутствие прикольных эмодзи. Буду вспоминать, как слушать гс, а не читать их.
❤🔥3🔥3❤2👍1
Никогда не думала, что с огромным кайфом буду пылесосить ковёр! Я чуть не кончила, когда услышала, как пылесос жужжит 😅 А еще стиралка! Мммм! Долгожданная мелодия окончания стирки! И душ! ГОРЯЧИЙ! ААААААА! Я СЧАСТЛИВА! Всем спасибо за внимание
❤7❤🔥3🔥3
Как же мне повезло, что я не встряла в кредиты. На меня итак давит то, что денег мало, всем вокруг должна. Если бы ещё и это, вскрылась бы давно.
❤5❤🔥3🔥3
- Сколько экшена тебе нужно во сне? - Да!
🔥7❤4❤🔥3
Забыла показать вам луну
❤🔥8😍5❤4
Котики
🔥6custom 52355085089751771955custom 58977206756400210594
Рандомные надписи Про бар как-то особенно в душу запало
❤7✍3🔥3
Ладно. В самом начале я пыталась сделать что-то эстетичное
❤🔥9❤6🔥5
Контекст: мне приснилось, что у аффинажа был концерт в каком-то стриптиз-клубе. Мне стало интересно крутятся ли девушки с сисями под их песни. Оказалось, что нет, там такого в принципе не было. Но заплакала я не от этого. А просто грустно от песни стало.
❤5❤🔥3🔥3
Расплакалась в стриптиз-клубе под Аффинаж
❤7❤🔥4custom 52355085089751771954🔥1
⭐️🤩🤩🤩🤩⭐️ 🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤 🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤 🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤 ⭐️⭐️⭐️ ⭐️ Загадочный криптограф, восставший из мертвых. Кто же Лэйн на самом деле — обычный человек, ключ к спасению мира или главная угроза? Фото : Дроузи
❤7🔥5❤🔥3
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @zelenaya_sosna. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🌲Зелёная Сосна🌲” (@zelenaya_sosna), 93 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zelenaya_sosna.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.