Photo, posted without a caption

Channel
ZEGA_FX
@zega_fx
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
220subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001229994812 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @zega_fx |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 16 May 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 21 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 21 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/zega_fx |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 17:45 | 220 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:17 | 221 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:41 | 221 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 16 May 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 December 2021. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
Do check out the review of Cjure by our friend Alex 👇👇👇👇 📌https://www.instagram.com/p/CWHVqbYo352/?utm_medium=copy_link
🔵Zega Recommended Copiers🔵 (TELEGRAM to MT4 Copiers) ❗Best Telegram To MT4 Copiers available out there -------------------------------------------------------- 🔰Copier : Telegram Connector 📌https://www.telegramconnector.com?aff=62 🔹Use the code : ZEGAFX (During checkout to avail 10% discount on membership) 🔰Copier : TelegramSignalsCopier 📌https://t.me/TelegrmSignalsCopier_bot?start=UTZNXXTATW 🔹Contact the copier ad…
❗Scammer❗ Guy's. Report this guy....... @OldSchool1312 He is a scammer..... His channel link : https://t.me/SARinsider Please Report him 🙏🙏🙏 He pm members and use abusive languages .
File, posted without a caption
Scam Alert ‼️‼️‼️‼️ HUGE SCAMMER report him: https://t.me/Forex_pioneerX
🔥Once in a Lifetime Opportunity🔥 Trader's Central Fund just launched their own coin named as - TCT Whoever join through the below link will get assured 1k to 2.5k TCT coins 💰 You can also send and receive unlimited TCT coins TO and FROM your friends These TCT coins can be used as discount coins while purchasing any Package/Challenge from TCF ❗ 🔹1k TCT gives 10% discount 🔹2k TCT gives 20% discount 🔹3k TCT gives 3…
🔰Channel Review🔰 📌https://t.me/FXFUNDINGMATE 🔹Zega Conclusion : ✓Fxfunding Mate is one of the best channels we have at Zega . ✓He is transparent and profitable . His trades will help you pass challenges from FTMO , FT and other prop firms . ✓He has tight SL ✓No Partial Closing ✓Mostly give Limits/Stops . So entries are perfect ✅Zega Verify Fxfunding Mate as a profitable and transparent signal provider Admin Conta…
Affiliate Link 📌 : https://fundingtalent.com/pricing/ref/2392/
Photo, posted without a caption
#SCAMALERT Be Careful with these two guys . They have accepted payments and not adding the paid member to vip channel ‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @zega_fx. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 3
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 3
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@zega_fx named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ZEGA_FX” (@zega_fx), 220 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zega_fx.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.