Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for zaryanok

Channel

zaryanok

@zaryanokanton

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

57subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001244911856
TypeChannel
Username@zaryanokanton
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 September 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged3 times, most recently 4 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/zaryanokanton

Growth

575857.56 August 2026 — 58 subscribers10 August 2026 — 58 subscribers20 August 2026 — 57 subscribers6 August 202620 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 14 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 57–58 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
20 Aug 2026, 20:2657-1
10 Aug 2026, 06:0158no change
6 Aug 2026, 17:5558first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 13 June 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 54s
Average length
29s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

243 reactions across 14 posts, in 46 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 8.64% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
218.64%
custom 5312507802189580716145.76%
custom 5253691888677961903124.94%
custom 5877327573918159085114.53%
custom 5445317742989157834104.12%
custom 5463347122344576444104.12%
custom 5465284805430114402104.12%
custom 544983718245592002893.70%
custom 528950802468623397883.29%
custom 535063845741894837783.29%
custom 542501247334851957483.29%
custom 533504893731525263972.88%
custom 525367198150454334562.47%
custom 529228609113766359662.47%
custom 523569747035633224352.06%
custom 528958373636972682352.06%
custom 528978438865186083252.06%
custom 528987019350849990952.06%
custom 532336520034099083652.06%
custom 533492833892854499552.06%
26 further kinds7330.0%

Custom emoji. 19 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 243 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 13 June 2025 to 5 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 14 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @zaryanokanton. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 13 June 2025 to 5 May 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

5 May 2026, 18:34 UTC202 views16 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @ihujinnPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 52536719815045433456custom 52534572116649096824custom 52534889729480625174custom 52561159853996931522

17 Mar 2026, 23:53 UTC359 views20 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🏌Технологическое развитие объективов к середине XX века привело к тому, что многие операторы стали натягивать женские чулки на заднюю линзу объектива. Все началось с черезмерной резкостью линз, и невозможностью отретушировать морщинистые лица звезд. Когда энтузиасты искали решение этих проблем, выяснилось, что ткань натянутая за байонетом разглаживала кожу, давала уникальную текстуру боке, и “масляность”, которую н

custom 52922860911376635966custom 52895837363697268235custom 52898701935084999095custom 52897513775332243824

23 Feb 2026, 16:06 UTC352 views17 reactions1 Starread 10 August 2026
Photo

In Slobodskoy, I once came across a goat. I gave him a «Belomor» — he just sat there, chewing on it.

custom 53233652003409908365custom 53751337983693555655custom 53349935322371481434custom 53372150396464933763

25 Sept 2025, 19:54 UTC686 views27 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

Знаете, если к вам бежит кошка и очень сильно ласкается, то это не значит, что вы хороший человек.

custom 525369188867796190312custom 53506384574189483778custom 52539248305242257304custom 58705014063009672203

15 Sept 2025, 11:18 UTC660 views11 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Форма рейтинга личных приоритетов — как «самый любимый» (кино, литература и т. д.) — кажется, совсем не работает. Где-то внутри, отдавая какому-то произведению подобный статус, я не чувствую искренней эмоции — той же самой, когда говорю про любимого человека. Это невозможно спутать. И кажется, что лучшим клеймированием будет то, что ты готов назвать «уважаемым». Я могу назвать несколько десятков произведений, которы

custom 52693789474889474134custom 53957605248372778033custom 53009567066903262572custom 53012345223549011062

26 Aug 2025, 17:22 UTC598 views15 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

Нервная система такая же часть вас, как сердце и лёгкие. Мозг — орган. Усталость реальна. Вы не ленивы. Будьте мягче к себе.

custom 54498371824559200289custom 53007566428187140623custom 53007691154037404322custom 54250124733485195741

9 Aug 2025, 16:30 UTC639 views25 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🎄 Monasterio de Trifón. Aguas de Ezhovo. 2025.

custom 546528480543011440210custom 52895080246862339788custom 52897843886518608325custom 52921582643209994932

3 Aug 2025, 07:38 UTC564 views25 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 546334712234457644410custom 542501247334851957473custom 53709454751113184793custom 53709617530373711142

16 Jul 2025, 20:08 UTC685 views20 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

29 июля 1997 года Берроуз, трижды повторяет одну и ту же фразу: «The last word is LOVE» 30 июля 1997 года (последняя запись перед смертью): «L O V E» Я до конца был уверен, что вся эта история с последней записью — манипуляция с целыми блоками текста. Но оригинальные рукописи, фотографии которых мне прислали, говорят обратное. Представляю лицо Джеймса Грауэрхольца, когда он расшифровывал дневники и обнаружил это в

6custom 53350489373152526396custom 52356974703563322435custom 53373222377352165942custom 53350552122624693131

11 Jul 2025, 19:52 UTC561 views15 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

Ненависть к кошкам — симптом душевного уродства, глупости и жестокости. Всё худшее скапливается в человеке, который не выдерживает мягкого веса живого существа в ладонях. С такими не садятся за один стол. Не делят хлеб. Они недостойны любви. --- 30 июля 1997 года Уильям Берроуз оставил в своем дневнике запись: «Единственное, что может разрешить [внутренний] конфликт, — это любовь. Такую, какую я испытывал к [кошк

9custom 53507020358198339893custom 53978908114362137462custom 53350489373152526391

7 Jul 2025, 14:12 UTC587 views17 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Декабрь 1916 года. Леонид Сабанеев пишет разгромную статью о московском выступлении «Скифской сюиты» двадцатипятилетнего Прокофьева. Но концерт был неожиданно отменён. Сабанеев написал рецензию заранее, полагаясь на афишу и свои предвзятые представления о творчестве Прокофьева. Концерта не было. Прокофьев не выступал. Сабанеев этого не знал. Статья вышла. Он — один из самых оригинальных и влиятельных русских крити

custom 531250780218958071610custom 533492833892854499551custom 53007566428187140621

30 Jun 2025, 22:26 UTC530 views16 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

custom 544531774298915783410custom 53125078021895807162custom 533714976902848891121custom 53507020358198339891

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @zaryanokanton. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 20 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“zaryanok” (@zaryanokanton), 57 subscribers as measured 20 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zaryanokanton.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.