2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 68–70 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 05:15
69
no change
12 Aug 2026, 05:02
69
first reading
Engagement
13 posts held, back to 20 April 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
21
Videos
13
Links
6
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
5m 09s
Average length
1m 02s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
205 reactions across 12 posts, in 29 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 13.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5469758164192748444
27
13.2%
custom 5467533482802574797
17
8.29%
custom 5470124658047086618
15
7.32%
custom 5215674633470112530
14
6.83%
🔥
13
6.34%
custom 5280596890964993465
12
5.85%
custom 5213082693721414907
10
4.88%
custom 5330337027479051714
10
4.88%
custom 5278445219723882482
9
4.39%
❤
8
3.90%
custom 5280994214094580578
7
3.41%
custom 5470086480082792845
7
3.41%
❤🔥
7
3.41%
custom 5235607452136779617
6
2.93%
custom 5231289558305351983
5
2.44%
custom 5472360523532084863
5
2.44%
🏆
5
2.44%
custom 5215648232306145035
4
1.95%
custom 5354903467318061957
4
1.95%
custom 5382006562086726076
4
1.95%
9 further kinds
16
7.80%
Custom emoji. 16 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 205reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 20 April 2025 to 15 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
8
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 12 we hold a reading for · 17%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @zarniicca2. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 13 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 April 2025 to 15 April 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Всем привет! 👋
Мы вернулись! 🚀 Совсем скоро стартует долгожданная «Зарница 2.0», и это будет мощно!🔥
ВАЖНОЕ ОБЪЯВЛЕНИЕ!!!
: теперь вся актуальная информация, новости и подробности будут публиковаться только в нашем новом канале в приложении MAX. 📲
Скорее переходите туда, чтобы ничего не пропустить! Ждем всех!
https://max.ru/join/Odj1_oynpI2PcjZWGHr7cRD1rDBpsoJXpy9aTS6aGTk
"Вот и подошла к концу наша "Зарница 2.0"!
3️⃣0️⃣ апреля мы участвовали в церемонии награждения и, хоть и не заняли призового места в общем зачете, это не повод для грусти!😚
Мы обязательно вернемся сильнее в следующем году! 💪🏻
🌟-Сердечно поздравляем среднюю категорию с почетным 3 местом!❤️
🌟-Кроме того, у нас есть потрясающие личные достижения:
🌟-Ткачева Таисия стала лучшим военкором, заняв 1 место! 🏅
🌟-Дорошенко Диа…
Солнечный день подарил участникам "Зарницы 2.0" идеальную погоду для заключительного этапа – тактической игры в березовой роще с использованием лазертага
🌟-Азарт и волнение смешивались в едином потоке эмоций.Участники проявили не только умение метко стрелять, но и стратегическое мышление, умение координировать действия в команде и быстро принимать решения в условиях ограниченного времени.🙌🏻
🌟-Каждая команда отдала вс…
➡️Ребят наши аккаунты в соц сетях
🔵Тик ток @zarniza2.0_
🔵Телеграмм @zarniicca2
➡️Подписывайтесь и приглашайте своих друзей🥰
Мы очень рады за вашу поддержку лайки и комментарии 😀
На «Зарнице 2.0» старшая группа «Пограничник-15» продемонстрировала высокий уровень подготовки в специализированных областях.
2️⃣4️⃣ апреля состоялось несколько этапов Зарницы 2.0:
🌟-Этап тактической медицины стал проверкой знаний и навыков в оказании первой помощи в условиях, приближенных к боевым. Ребята оперативно и грамотно проводили осмотр «пострадавших», накладывали повязки и оказывали необходимую помощь.🩹
🌟-Э…
"Старшая группа «Пограничник-15» приняла участие в насыщенной программе «Зарницы 2.0»
🌟-Сегодня наша команда, а также средний состав продемонстрировали отличную подготовку и командный дух❤️🩹
🌟-Военизированная эстафета стала настоящим испытанием на выносливость и командную работу, где каждый участник выложился на все сто процентов😎
🌟-Четкость и слаженность действий продемонстрировали ребята на этапе строевой подгото…
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @zarniicca2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,282,240 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Пограничник-15, старшая категория 💪🏻” (@zarniicca2), 69 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zarniicca2.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.