Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Здесь клиенты доходят до оплаты | Зарема Измаилова

Channel

Здесь клиенты доходят до оплаты | Зарема Измаилова

@zara_shatbot

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

258subscribers

-52 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003345615744
TypeChannel
Username@zara_shatbot
CreatedBetween 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/zara_shatbot

Growth

2583102846 August 2026 — 310 subscribers6 August 2026 — 310 subscribers7 August 2026 — 304 subscribers14 August 2026 — 258 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 8 days, net -52. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 250–318 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 22:38258-46
7 Aug 2026, 00:38304-6
6 Aug 2026, 22:18310no change
6 Aug 2026, 17:33310first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 15 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

614 reactions across 11 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍20934.0%
10216.6%
custom 52580942988758671727912.9%
🥰6610.7%
custom 5258290467212138110528.47%
👏376.03%
🔥335.37%
👌264.23%
custom 525844471666761016360.977%
🙏30.489%
custom 525807762581282027310.163%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 614reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 June 2026 to 16 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

16 Jul 2026, 07:45 UTC91 views44 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Когда предприниматель впервые задумывается о чат-боте, чаще всего он начинает сравнивать цены. Это вполне понятно. Хочется найти решение, которое поможет сэкономить. Но именно в этот момент многие совершают ошибки, из-за которых потом приходится переделывать всё заново. Первая ошибка — выбирать чат-бота только по стоимости. Если единственный критерий выбора — цена, есть риск получить не рабочую систему, а набор сооб

👍22custom 525809429887586717219🙏3

29 Jun 2026, 11:42 UTC153 views41 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Недавно ко мне обратился владелец салона красоты. Он был уверен, что проблема в количестве новых заявок. Клиенты приходили, записывались, оставались довольны услугой, но через время поток повторных записей становился все меньше. Первой мыслью было увеличить рекламный бюджет и привлечь еще больше людей. Когда мы начали смотреть не на рекламу, а на путь клиента после первого посещения, причина стала очевидной. После ви

👍20custom 525829046721213811018custom 52580942988758671723

26 Jun 2026, 08:56 UTC119 views30 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Когда-то я тоже думала , что чат-боты и автоматизация нужны только большим компаниям. Казалось, что небольшой салон или частный мастер легко справятся сами. Ведь клиентов не так много, значит и проблем быть не должно. Но чем больше я работаю с бьюти-сферой, тем яснее вижу другую картину. Именно небольшие студии и частные мастера сильнее всего чувствуют последствия каждого пропущенного сообщения. Пока мастер занят с

👍16👏14

24 Jun 2026, 05:11 UTC131 views92 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Многие уверены, что преимущество всегда на стороне крупных компаний. Больше сотрудников, больше клиентов, больше возможностей. Но на практике в бьюти-сфере часто происходит обратное. Небольшая студия быстрее внедряет автоматизацию и начинает расти там, где более крупные игроки продолжают терять деньги на одних и тех же процессах. Причина простая. Когда бизнес небольшой, каждая заявка имеет значение. Пропущенное соо

👍30custom 525809429887586717229👏23custom 52584447166676101636custom 52582904672121381103custom 52580776258128202731

23 Jun 2026, 06:58 UTC108 views92 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Каждый день администратор отвечает на одни и те же вопросы, подтверждает записи, напоминает клиентам о визите, ищет свободные окна и переписывается с теми, кто хочет уточнить стоимость услуг. Со стороны кажется, что это обычная работа. Проблема в том, что десятки одинаковых действий постепенно съедают время сотрудников. Чем больше клиентов становится в салоне, тем сильнее растет нагрузка. Поэтому автоматизация не н

👍32🥰30👌26custom 52580942988758671724

22 Jun 2026, 07:46 UTC107 views53 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Когда люди слышат слово «автоматизация», многие сразу думают о сложных программах, дорогих решениях и бесконечных настройках. Но на практике все намного проще. Представьте велосипед. Чтобы ехать вперед, нужно постоянно крутить педали. Остановились — остановилось и движение. А теперь представьте электровелосипед. Управляете им все так же вы, но часть нагрузки он берет на себя. Автоматизация работает по тому же прин

custom 525829046721213811025custom 525809429887586717223👍5

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @zara_shatbot. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,134,976 of 1,549,704entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Здесь клиенты доходят до оплаты | Зарема Измаилова” (@zara_shatbot), 258 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zara_shatbot.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.