Channel
@zapiski133113
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
46subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001191586669 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @zapiski133113 |
| Created | 21 October 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/zapiski133113 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 01:59 | 46 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 14:00 | 47 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:04 | 47 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 21 March 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 March 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
11 reactions across 5 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 4 | 36.4% | |
| 😢 | 4 | 36.4% | |
| ❤ | 3 | 27.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 21 March 2022 to 25 March 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
⚡️🔥 Пашинян в беседе с Путиным выдвинул вопрос о расследовании действий миротворцев в Арцахе Премьер-министр Никол Пашинян провел телефонный разговор с президентом Российской Федерации Владимиром Путиным. "Была обсуждена сложившаяся после вторжения азербайджанских подразделений в зону ответственности миротворческого контингента РФ в Нагорном Карабахе ситуация, которую премьер-министр Пашинян оценил как напряженную"…
‼️Нельзя снимать передвижение войск и техники. Ни в коем случае.
👍2
❗️ Армия обороны Арцаха также сообщает, что по состоянию на 14:00 ситуация на восточной границе Арцаха продолжает оставаться крайне напряженной.
😢2
❗️Азербайджан применил Bayraktar-ы во время боёв возле села Парух, сообщил председатель постоянной комиссии НС по внешним связям, депутат от правящей фракции "Гражданский договор" Эдуард Агаджанян. 💥 Двое военных погибли, сообщает Армия Обороны Арцаха.
💥 ВС Азербайджана обстреляли позиции Армии обороны НКР, ранен один армянский военный – АО Нагорного Карабаха В сообщении Армии Обороны говорится, что аз-ие военные накануне грубо нарушили трехсторонние договоренности и вторглись в зону ответственности миротворческого контингента на территории Нагорного Карабаха. Они взяли под контроль село Парух Аскеранского района и близлежащие позиции, а потом попытались продвину…
❗️ Ситуацию в Нагорном Карабахе обсудили по телефону главы минобороны России и Армении
🙄 В телеграм-каналах снова начался словесный понос в связи с напряжённой ситуацией в Арцахе. У всех снова появились «свои источники» и «достоверная информация». Призываем следить исключительно за официальной информацией и (мало-мальски) проверенными сми и журналистами.
👍2
Армянки, изменившие мир. Эти выдающиеся женщины отличались не только манерами, изяществом, но и природным умом. Представляем имена армянских женщин, которыми по праву восторгались не только в Армении, но и во Франции, Сингапуре, США и в других странах мира. Про некоторых из них мы уже делали отдельно презентации. Диана Абгар и Анна Абамелек-Баратынская T.me/GitaDaran
❤3
В Арцахе снова нет газа.
😢2
Забавно читать советский учебник по истории Азербайджана. В нем Вы найдете и про турецкую оккупацию Азербайджана, и про насильственное насаждение суннизма турками на оккупированных территориях, и даже краем глаза увидите непрямую (прямую цитату боялись дать, чтобы армяне лишний раз духом не воспряли) цитату средневекового армянского историка...
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @zapiski133113. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
@zapiski133113 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Злой гусь” (@zapiski133113), 46 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zapiski133113.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.