Channel
@zapisi_kire1n
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
39subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003244151076 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @zapisi_kire1n |
| Created | Between 1 October 2025 and 31 January 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 3 times, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/zapisi_kire1n |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Aug 2026, 17:37 | 39 | -1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 00:26 | 40 | +1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 19:46 | 39 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:18 | 39 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 30 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
108 reactions across 17 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5368754655243305647 | 37 | 34.3% | |
| custom 5334960697212160263 | 19 | 17.6% | |
| ❤🔥 | 15 | 13.9% | |
| ❤ | 12 | 11.1% | |
| ⚡ | 8 | 7.41% | |
| 🔥 | 7 | 6.48% | |
| custom 5350823609164119522 | 4 | 3.70% | |
| custom 5470043324251392761 | 2 | 1.85% | |
| 👀 | 2 | 1.85% | |
| 😢 | 2 | 1.85% |
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 108 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 30 May 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
А, ну и ещё я готовлю мини лохо "комикс" с Веником и Альцестом на 4 странички [я точно не забью.. хотя я в таком случае покажу скетчевый варик т.к мне слишком нравится моя задумка взаимоотношений альцеста и веника] #щп
custom 53687546552433056476⚡1🔥1
Вы когда нибудь пробывали рисовать в WORD???? Главный плюс покупки графического планшета 🤩
custom 53687546552433056477🔥1
Пик моего скилла [‼️‼️ТАМ НАПИСАНО ГНДР А НЕ П-ВОРД‼️‼️] #щп
custom 533496069721216026311🔥1
А вот и итог с афтографами!!
❤3❤🔥3custom 53687546552433056472
Оно ОЧЕНЬ КРУТО выглядит распечатаным, покажу уже потом со всеми росписями хохохо #щп
❤🔥8
Завтра шилд фест, я туда увы не попаду, но за то получу афтографы через Чарли Смотрите какой крутой листик сделала (^.^) Фруктики - место для афтографов еслишто
custom 53687546552433056479❤🔥2
тик ток кинул мой аккаунт в теневой бан 💀
custom 53687546552433056472
Веноши веноши веноши веноши веноши веноши веноши веноши 🌟 ⚔️🌾
⚡7
А нука поднимите руку те кто считают лор мш4 запутанным и поясните что вы под этим подразумеваете. Мне интересно, это только некоторые люди путают запутанность и перегруз чеховскими ружьями, или это я зря разделяю эти термины #щп
custom 53349606972121602635
Сегодня замечательный день! Если вы не знали, сегодня празднуется День любви к капибарам! Да-да, самым лучшим и милым созданиям на свете. А и еще сегодня день рождения Веназара, точно. По случаю такого "неинтересного" события я организовала коллаб, целью которого было создать физический экземпляр зина, посвященного полностью одному персонажу.(А то в нынешних зинах его появлений как солнечных дней в Питере) Проект н…
❤🔥2
Пять друзей [голосов в голове] Веназара которые теперь живут в доме Леоши бтв кстати✌️ ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ P.S. меня заставили.
custom 53687546552433056477custom 53508236091641195224custom 53349606972121602633
Мод состав Веназара буквально:
❤4
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @zapisi_kire1n. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@zapisi_kire1n named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Записи Кирейн_” (@zapisi_kire1n), 39 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zapisi_kire1n.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.