Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Съела – записала

Channel

Съела – записала

@zapisalaeda

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,289subscribers

-18 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002500396424
TypeChannel
Username@zapisalaeda
CreatedBetween 1 January 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/zapisalaeda

Growth

1,2891,3071,2987 August 2026 — 1,307 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,306 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,306 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,304 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,295 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,289 subscribers7 August 202617 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 10 days, net -18. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,286–1,310 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 11:281,289-6
14 Aug 2026, 09:461,295-9
10 Aug 2026, 15:511,304-2
7 Aug 2026, 22:321,306no change
7 Aug 2026, 21:311,306-1
7 Aug 2026, 15:171,307first reading

Engagement

4 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.18%
avg views ÷ 1,289 subscribers
Avg views / post
66.8
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
15.4%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 4 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held4 (3 August 20266 August 2026)
Views total267
Reactions total41
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 22:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

41 reactions across 4 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1331.7%
custom 5305470330771361063614.6%
❤‍🔥49.76%
custom 534388902368746808637.32%
👏37.32%
💘37.32%
🔥37.32%
💯24.88%
😍24.88%
🥰24.88%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 4 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 41reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 4 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 15:30 UTC45 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

красивый, уютных ресторан Stay, отмечали тут с мужем нашу годовщину. официанты вежливые, блюда вкусные, цены не низкие Нигири филадельфия - 10/10 Ошидзуси с лососем - 7/10 Салат греческий - 10/10 Запеченый баклажан с кимчи - 100/10 Кимчи - не мое Черная треска с черным рисом - 10/10 Тарт матча - 6/10

❤‍🔥4💘2custom 53438890236874680862🥰1custom 53054703307713610631

5 Aug 2026, 10:25 UTC65 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

продолжаю публикацию вкусных и недорогих мест. на очереди кафе Лицей из минусов только близко расположенные столы. из плюсов — бесплатно наливают воду, разнообразное меню, вкусные блюда, низкие цены, невероятная выпечка 🥐 #рекомендую!

3custom 53054703307713610632💘1🥰1custom 53438890236874680861

4 Aug 2026, 09:50 UTC71 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🥬 Квашеная капуста — один из самых недооцененных суперфудов. во время естественного брожения в ней образуются молочнокислые бактерии и органические кислоты, которые помогают поддерживать здоровую микрофлору кишечника. здоровый кишечник — это не только хорошее пищеварение, но и крепкий иммунитет. кроме того, квашеная капуста богата витамином С, клетчаткой и содержит мало калорий, поэтому отлично подходит как дополне

3custom 53054703307713610633💯2🔥1

3 Aug 2026, 09:01 UTC86 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

если вы хотите уютное стильное место, вежливое обслуживание, вкусную еду и при этом, чтобы было недорого, вам точно стоит посетить ресторан Mosca ⭐️5.0 на яндекс картах недавно моя подруга праздновала там свой день рождения и я осталась в восторге от этого места! все, что я попробовала было очень вкусно. у нас была супер милая и приятная официантка, а когда я увидела цены в меню, они меня сильно удивили. почти все

7👏3🔥2😍2

Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @zapisalaeda. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 483,281 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Съела – записала” (@zapisalaeda), 1,289 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zapisalaeda.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.