冒个🫧
❤4

Channel
@zaozao_1234
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,244subscribers
+48 since we began measuring on 9 October 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1003625417169 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @zaozao_1234 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 October 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/zaozao_1234 |
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (qwen3.6:35b-a3b, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 25 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 85% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Nov 2026, 08:29 | 1,244 | +6 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 08:19 | 1,238 | -3 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 22:40 | 1,241 | +7 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 15:34 | 1,234 | +5 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 20:40 | 1,229 | -6 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 02:00 | 1,235 | +1 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 18:47 | 1,234 | +9 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 11:39 | 1,225 | +29 |
| 9 Oct 2026, 17:22 | 1,196 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (5 August 2026 – 7 October 2026) |
| Views total | 1,050 |
| Reactions total | 4 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Oct 2026, 17:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
30 reactions across 11 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 24 | 80.0% | |
| 🥰 | 3 | 10.0% | |
| 😱 | 2 | 6.67% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 3.33% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 30 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 7 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 1 post held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
冒个🫧
❤4
休息啦
❤4
老师:早早 评价人:匿名提交 综合评分 评价等级:夯 评价样本:7 条 出击过程 久仰早早大名 提前约好课 来找到老师 一见面果然名不虚传 嫩妹中天花板的存在 各方面数值都拉满了 没什么缺点 无脑冲就完了 🍁武汉集团精品楼凤榜报告🍁
老师:早早 评价人:匿名提交 综合评分 评价等级:夯 评价样本:6 条 出击过程 小区位置很好,环境也ok老师身材很好,人很温柔。进门就看见老师躲在墙角,人很小只很可爱。服务有舌吻很好评,从传教士开始换了n个姿势,老师给的反馈很足,很不错的出击体验。 🍁武汉集团精品楼凤榜报告🍁
❤3
安全cj 放心你我他😀
宝宝们今天满啦 可以开始排明天的啦
出击用户: 奉先 出击时间:2026-06-28 17:00 出击水费:6 老师艺名:青山早早 联系方式:@zaozao_123 颜值:10分 身材:9分 安全评价:公寓,安全性一般 推荐程度:10分 出击过程: 1、线上认识很早了,之前在汉阳距离蛮远,现在青山勉强接受,遂往之… 2、小芝麻,身高155左右,胸B,颜值很高,大眼睛高鼻梁厚嘴唇很性感,广东美女,略有一丝短视频里面泰国小美的既视感… 3、皮肤白皙光滑,肩部有小块纹身,算是点缀了 🎗【服务体验】 1、洗完在床上抱着蛇了会儿,当做是前戏了,像是在跟女朋友做爱 2、情绪价值方面,早早性格开朗,有说有笑的 3、口硬后戴套女上,日感巨特码好,尾课居然还能那么紧,有点出人意料 4、各种姿势配合,时不时还蹦出几句骚话,女上的时候说她要日死我,差点笑软了,换传教、颠勺、侧入后,最终厚乳加攻速出水,loading过程中感觉快把她日高潮了!意犹未尽,战斗爽! 🌈【总结】 1、颜值高…
❤4
出击用户:清辉夜凝 出击时间:2026-06-21 18:00 出击水费:6 老师艺名:@zaozao_123 联系方式:。。。 颜值:10分 身材:9分 安全评价:安全 推荐程度:10分 出击过程:很幸运约到了尾课,也是早早到位,早早160左右的身高,整体偏纤细,第一眼给人的感觉很有青春感。照片和本人相比,现实状态反而更有灵气,属于比较耐看的类型。整体气质干净自然,不是那种过于张扬的风格,而是比较邻家、舒服的感觉。最大的特点是亲和力比较强。见面时给人的感觉比较自然,没有距离感,笑起来很有感染力,属于容易让人放松下来的类型。相处过程中比较健谈,也愿意分享自己的生活和一些经历。整体氛围比较轻松,容易产生熟悉感。如果喜欢自然型、女友感比较强的风格,应该会比较符合预期。之前关注了一段时间,主要是觉得她的风格比较符合个人审美。真正见面后,最大的感受是照片看着有点高冷但本人实际很逗比。服务和课表一致,略。 温馨提示:报告仅供参考,出击还得…
中奖的宝宝及时联系哦 有效期三天哈
今天满了哦 宝宝们可以预约明天哦
下午空 可以月哦
明天开啦 宝宝们可以预约啦🥰
👏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @zaozao_1234. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“早早小窝💒” (@zaozao_1234), 1,244 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zaozao_1234.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.