Channel
@whjtbg2
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,600subscribers
+72 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002480806175 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @whjtbg2 |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/whjtbg2 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 17:38 | 1,600 | +44 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 09:12 | 1,556 | +25 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:17 | 1,531 | +3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:33 | 1,528 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:00 | 1,528 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (6 August 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 8,573 |
| Reactions total | 3 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 21:33 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
3 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
老师：安七 评价人：匿名提交 综合评分 评价等级：夯 评价样本：1 条 样本较少，仅供参考 出击过程 跟安七老师约好时间，到地方，一进门，看见推荐的老师穿了一件性感的战袍，女友感拉满，人很好看，房间很大很宽敞，干净舒服不压抑，简单聊一会喝了点水。进浴室一次性用品齐全，开始帮洗，擦干后我直接躺床上。于是措不及防就开始了，像是欲求不满的女友强行索爱，服务很细心，课表的服务真的很到位，在别的地方找过这么多的老师，安七老师很顶，让人仿佛飘在云端，口活更是绝，让我全身都非常舒服，口的太深了，全身都有酥麻的感觉，老师见状带上 tt 做上来，进入时感觉很烫很紧，一边上下摇动，销魂的感觉，微微的叫床声，隐隐约约能听到水声，两手抓着奶子，奶子真不小，让我更加卖力，接着后入式，圆润的臀围，紧致的下身，各种姿势，终于出水。洗完澡出来，喝水聊天休息。后面还稍微超时了点。但是老师全程不催。走的时候超久熊抱像是异地了很久的女友，内心被狠狠治愈了，下次…
老师：若曦 评价人：匿名提交 综合评分 评价等级：夯 评价样本：21 条 出击过程 朋友力推，说若曦服务很不错，垂涎已久，刚好时间对上了 刷频道的时候留意到了和老师约好时间遥控上楼 进门就看见若曦老师躲在门口偷看，就这样做我心中留下了印象交水费 先是一起洗澡，完了一进房间老师换好制服，我靠，这温柔乡我哪里顶的住这 、 我抚摸她的胸还真不小，之后妹妹贴贴在床上聊天热热场，性格非常好，女友感直接拉满！情绪很到位，一脸欲求不满的眼神看着你我就知道要开始课程了，老师会甜甜的笑着然后一路向下 摸 然后再调情再起机 忍不住了就插进小逼逼里 喷了出来 我靠 也太爽了，抱着若曦老师感受着高潮的余韵，这谁顶得住呀，爱了爱了，性格非常好情绪价值直接拉满！，真有女友感。体验感真的无需多言，又是美美的一天🥹🥹兄弟们，🉑以冲，好爽 🍁武汉集团精品楼凤榜报告🍁
老师：羊咩咩 评价人：An ni 综合评分 评价等级：夯 评价样本：24 条 出击过程 人比照片好看，非常正的妹子。夯 🍁武汉集团精品楼凤榜报告🍁
老师：小熊猫 评价人：新一 综合评分 评价等级：夯 评价样本：5 条 出击过程 2刷小熊猫老师，频道听说ls又来武汉了，短开几天，果断约课。上次真的是意犹未尽，一进门依旧是甜甜的笑容迎接，精致的脸蛋，眼睛大大的，笑起来也很可爱，视线下移就是一对傲人的双峰，进门就忍不住捏了一把，老师也是很配合，嘴不自觉就凑了过来，🐍都是大蟒蛇，很配合，战场依然和上次一样，选择了客厅沙发，第二次还是很新奇的体验，我和老师商量的情况下还带了点奶油。。至于怎么用ly们自己猜一下，真的爽的不行，有什么小要求都可以提前跟老师商量，不过分的都会满足，整个过程下来简直爽飞了，服务天花板级别了，人也好看，身材也好，唯一就是老师不常驻武汉，只短开，过几天就又要走了，想去的ly一定要抓住机会赶紧约 🍁武汉集团精品楼凤榜报告🍁
老师：早早 评价人：浪卿 综合评分 评价等级：夯 评价样本：5 条 出击过程 “到了。”你打开门，我走进去。躲在门后的你跳了出来，像一只小精灵，灵动可爱。 我们坐在沙发随便聊着天，不用赶节奏，自在又舒服，这也正是我最喜欢的感觉。 洗漱完来到二楼，一切顺其自然，氛围温柔得恰到好处。 我看着你，你打趣我：“你这眼睛看狗都深情。” 我笑着没说话，凑上去吻了你。 所有的一切，都在我最喜欢、安心的节奏里慢慢延续。 Ps：妹子不耐桩 愿诸君温柔以待 🍁武汉集团精品楼凤榜报告🍁
老师：安七 评价人：哥 俊 综合评分 评价等级：顶级 出击过程 今天看到新老师上榜，忍不住过去看看，约好时间过去到了位置，一进门，老师和照片一样没有差距，老师很热情，给我拿水喝，和老师一起坐在沙发上聊了一会，老师好白的大腿呀，🐻也不小，最低C，我忍不住和老师在沙发缠绵一会，和老师一起去洗澡，老师用沐浴露抹在胸上给我熊推，用屁股蹭我兄弟，我靠，真的太爽啦，洗完后老师给我擦干身体，领着我去床边坐着，然后老师换上情趣内衣，开始跳舞挑逗我，老师从背后抚摸我，慢慢地从我垮下过来，一直亲着，摸着，这服务太到位啦，老师的口活太到位啦，这比我之前在会所点的头牌还厉害，忍不住啦，赶紧戴套和老师在床上大战3百回合，老师很敏感，几把下面都是水，真的好爽呀，🐻也很挺，这趟来值啦，过几天再来约老师，这样的老师必须推荐冲 🍁武汉集团精品楼凤榜报告🍁
老师：小梦 评价人：发呆 综合评分 评价等级：顶级 评价样本：1 条 样本较少，仅供参考 出击过程 看到小梦的照片，被小梦的可爱的颜值吸引了，昨天时间对不上都没约上，今天终于约上了。进门验货，妹子人照无差，皮肤挺好的，五官精致 淡妆看起来显得老师很清纯，一身吊带裙很戳我xp，果断交了水费。妹子比较健谈，情绪价值这一块拉满。妹子把脸凑过来，果断舌吻管饱，🐍起来感觉妹子舌头真软，说到我是个腿控，抚摸妹子很配合，就连头发都是香香的，很诱人，细节就不细说了，各位自行脑补，总之很满意，服务态度、配合度都很好，走之前还顺了瓶水走了！出来玩就图个高兴，必须推荐！ 🍁武汉集团精品楼凤榜报告🍁
老师：小念 评价人：匿名提交 综合评分 评价等级：夯 评价样本：30 条 出击过程 二刷小念，人如照片 真人比照片还要漂亮 一双大长腿 翘臀 让我恋恋不忘 性格脾气也好 🍁武汉集团精品楼凤榜报告🍁
老师：小念 评价人：匿名提交 综合评分 评价等级：夯 评价样本：29 条 出击过程 约了几次，终于约到了二刷 大蟒🐍，腰细，翘臀很有手感，奶头很敏感，下面水多润，性格很好，情绪价值到位 🍁武汉集团精品楼凤榜报告🍁
老师：羊咩咩 评价人：起 风 综合评分 评价等级：夯 评价样本：23 条 出击过程 咩咩本人要比照片好看很多。胸大，身材好，不是嫩妹的那种娇小，可以说是恰到好处。小白虎，任盘。日感，反馈都很好，边日边🐍边摸奶子，观感体验都很顶，特别是下面水很多，水声很大。值得冲，大赚 🍁武汉集团精品楼凤榜报告🍁
老师：小念 评价人：匿名提交 综合评分 评价等级：夯 评价样本：28 条 出击过程 之前一直在群里面看好多人探讨小念 今天有幸约到一课 ，人如照片 真人比照片还要漂亮 一双大长腿 翘臀 让我恋恋不忘 性格脾气也好 必须二刷 🍁武汉集团精品楼凤榜报告🍁
老师：小梦 评价人：蜡笔小7 综合评分 评价等级：夯 出击过程 欲火焚身，还是找个老师解决吧！看到梦梦妹子第一天开，颜值挺喜欢的就约一课尝尝鲜，这次也当一回车神，见到妹子本人很喜欢！热情，服务好，性格好爱笑，聊的来！很满意先交学费。进门妹子挺开放的，坐下来和我聊了一会儿天，看着身材不错，交了课费，洗澡有陪洗，妹子还会帮着擦干。然后就一起上床开🐍，妹子很配合。奶子也粉。一路👅B，妹子逼逼很干净，有毛，无异味。妹子口的很认真，口活是真不错，，没让停，就不停。随后带套进入，妹子姿势配合，传教侧入，两个姿势出水。 总结，妹子身材绝佳，配合度高，服务那些真没得说 很好，提供情绪价值，不像是出击，更像是跟女友开房的感觉，这么好的服务可得写个好评支持下妹子，必二刷！ 🍁武汉集团精品楼凤榜报告🍁
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @whjtbg2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 146,678 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“武汉集团报告（备用）” (@whjtbg2), 1,600 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/whjtbg2.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.