3 measurements spanning 1 day, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 65–66 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Sept 2026, 12:58
66
+1
12 Sept 2026, 05:22
65
no change
12 Sept 2026, 04:47
65
first reading
Engagement
11 posts held, back to 18 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
53 reactions across 10 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
32
60.4%
❤🔥
9
17.0%
👏
4
7.55%
🍌
3
5.66%
💩
2
3.77%
⚡
1
1.89%
🌭
1
1.89%
😍
1
1.89%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 53 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 18 May 2026 to 18 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🔔#سوال
درس زمین شناسی نخوندم
الان تا کنکور چیکار کنم؟!
درگیر نهایی ها هم هستم!
💬رفقا برای زمین شناسی میتونید
روی فصول های مهم وقت بزارید مثل ۱و ۳و۵ و۷..
به هیچ عنوان خالی گذاشتن این درس
توصیه نمیشه👎..
زمین شناسی از اون درساییه که میشه
تو مدت کم رسوند👍..
مخصوصا الان که راحت با خوندنش
تو حافظتون میمونه و بعدش میتونید نمونه سوال های پارسال کنکور و..حل کنید✅
سوالی داشتید بپرسید @MssM57
آزمون ۱۰ اردیبهشت
سوالات به دقت طرح و در آزمون قرار داده شده و سعی کردم تا حد امکان سوالات شبیه ادوار مختلف کنکور باشه🙌
موفق باشید 🌹🙏
اگه سوالی داشتید.
@MssM57
آزمون زیستاز (مبتکران)۲۴ اردیبهشت ۱۴۰۴
😎🙌 فعالیتم رو پرقدرت به عنوان طراح در این آزمون که هم جامعه آماری خوبی در رتبه های برتر کنکور و همه سایر دانش آموزا داره شروع کردم و ایشالا در آزمون هم دیگر کشور هم فعالیتمو ادامه خواهم داد.
سوالهای خوبی انتخاب و در آزمون قرار داده شده پیشنهاد میکنم حتما برای مرور و آمادگی کنکور بهشون بپردازید
خبرهای خوب در راه است.......
❤2❤🔥1
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @zaminkonkour404. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 18 May 2026 to 18 June 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
درمان دردمندان ♥️ @darmanedardmandan · 29,564 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 42 here — alongside 41 others — read 12 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“زیست و زمین کنکور || 🫀🌏” (@zaminkonkour404), 66 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zaminkonkour404.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.