Channel
@zamerovacoach
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
321subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002106168956 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @zamerovacoach |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/zamerovacoach |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 18:26 | 321 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:31 | 322 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:00 | 322 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 23 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (23 May 2026 – 31 July 2026) |
| Views total | 1,012 |
| Reactions total | 114 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 07:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
252 reactions across 16 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 162 | 64.3% | |
| 🔥 | 51 | 20.2% | |
| ❤🔥 | 29 | 11.5% | |
| 👏 | 6 | 2.38% | |
| 💯 | 3 | 1.19% | |
| 🤗 | 1 | 0.397% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 252reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 23 May 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @zamerovacoach. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 May 2026 to 31 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Одно из самых сложных обучений, которые я проходила, но я практически на финишной прямой, итоговый экзамен в среду 💪🏻 Легче всего мне далась психосоматика репродуктивной системы и телесно-ориентированная терапия. Под описание моего состояния подходит картина «Уставшая женщина» Тамары Лемпицка
❤9👏5
Сегодня последний раз мне 33. Завтра эта цифра сменится на другую. В 26 мне казалось, что этот возраст так далек, прям бесконечно далек, а теперь я к 40 ближе, чем к той бесшабашной и полной надежд себе 26-летней. Время-удивительная штука, не правда ли? Оно летит незаметно, оставляя за собой шлейф воспоминаний, уроков и неповторимых моментов. Эти 33 года стали настоящим путешествием, полным открытий и понимания. Я …
❤38
Любовь и вера, всё что остается с нами всегда ❤️
❤23💯2
Video message, posted without a caption
🔥6❤1
Многие до сих пор уверены, что «Анастасия» это диснеевская принцесса. Но её создала студия 20th Century Fox и кажется, именно поэтому эта история звучит иначе. Это мой любимый мультфильм с самого детства, когда еще были видики и кассеты. Мультфильм «Анастасия» не про «тебя выберут и начнётся счастье». Она про то, что счастье не начинается, пока ты не вернул(а) себе себя. Пока одни сказки обещают: «любовь спасёт»(чь…
🔥13❤3
Мои посты рождаются из ситуаций, опыта или просто из мысли: «О, я хочу об этом поговорить». И сегодня как раз об этом, о том, как классно задавать вопросы. Я обожаю «Смешариков» за то, что они простыми словами объясняют важные истины. И как же классно, что их смотрят взрослые тоже. В одной из серий поднимается тема, которую я постоянно вижу и в сессиях, и в обычных разговорах. Мы часто «додумываем» за другого чело…
❤14
В этот день, 11 лет назад я получила диплом о высшем образовании по специальности педагог-психолог. Я помню, как мы весело отмечали выпускной, размышляли о будущем и строили планы. Помню, как я отдала диплом маме и подумала о том, что я никогда не буду работать психологом. Без психологии я прожила примерно год после выпуска, и вот уже 10 лет так или иначе работаю в этой профессии и всем сердцем люблю ее!
🔥17❤9❤🔥6👏1🤗1
Иногда самый смелый шаг, это не пробить стену, а остановиться и спросить: «А что мне сейчас по‑настоящему нужно?» Сила бывает разной. Она может быть даже в том, чтобы на 10 минут снять броню и выдохнуть. Я знаю это не по книгам. Когда‑то я всё доказывала и пробивала, а моё тело говорило «Стоп». И я училась его слушать. Да, иногда я выбираю этот метод и сейчас, но уже не из отчаяния, а из выбора. Сейчас я помогаю же…
❤10
Сегодня у меня завершился уже третий модуль обучения по психосоматике и телесной терапии. Остался один шаг до конца этого большого пути, и я уже чувствую, как сильно он меняет мою работу и взгляд на процессы клиентов. Все, что я изучаю, постепенно начинаю вводить в сессии, и вижу, как органично это дополняет арт-коучинг. Там, где раньше мы больше опирались на образы и творчество, теперь ещё глубже подключается тело …
🔥11
Перед тем, как вы отправитесь по своим делам, в этот чудесный понедельник, предлагаю посмотреть отрывок мультфильма «Душа», и подумать о важном🤍
❤17
На днях задавала вопрос коллегам и подругам, задам и вам. Если бы вы были директором всего, какую бы должность дали мне? А я скажу, какую должность дала бы вам😏 Пишите в комментариях
❤5
Сегодня вместе с Валентиной провели тренинг «Разрешить себе». Для меня это был первый тренинг в Ставрополе, и я благодарна каждому участнику за вовлечённость, доверие и готовность к внутренней работе. Именно ваша открытость сделала эту встречу глубокой и ценной! Отдельная благодарность Валентине за профессиональное партнёрство и совместное создание пространства для важных осознаний и изменений. P.S. получать подде…
❤🔥11❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @zamerovacoach. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 1,097,892 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Работенко: по спирали событий и смыслов” (@zamerovacoach), 321 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zamerovacoach.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.