Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

محمود مهرمحمدی(زمانه‌ی ما)

@zamaneye_ma

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

875subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001925823918
TypeChannel
Username@zamaneye_ma
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/zamaneye_ma

Growth

875878876.57 August 2026 — 878 subscribers8 August 2026 — 878 subscribers14 August 2026 — 875 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 875–878 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 22:46875-3
8 Aug 2026, 01:15878no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:38878first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 28 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
48.9%
avg views ÷ 875 subscribers
Avg views / post
428
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.31%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held20 (28 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total8,565
Reactions total112
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 01:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
12m 08s
Average length
3m 02s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

112 reactions across 19 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3430.4%
👏3228.6%
👍1816.1%
👌1715.2%
😍54.46%
👎21.79%
😨21.79%
💯10.893%
🥰10.893%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 112reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 04:22 UTC145 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @drmo_eduPhoto

با احترام، به آگاهی می‌رسانم که مقاله مورد اشاره به زودی در کانال تربیت ایران‌نگر منتشر می‌شود https://t.me/drmo_edu

👍2

6 Aug 2026, 20:24 UTC191 views26 reactionsread 8 August 2026

✍یادداشت خانم دکتر پرنیان تقی‌پور 🔸️دانش‌آموخته رشته مطالعات برنامه درسی سخنان وزیر محترم آموزش و پرورش را شنیدم و با خود اندیشیدم: این سخنان چه چیزی را به دانسته های ما افزوده است که پیش از این نمی‌دانستیم؟ اینکه آموزش و پرورش با کمبود منابع مالی، نیروی انسانی و امکانات روبرو است، واقعیتی است که سال هاست درباره آن گفته و نوشته می شود. بنابراین، بیان این واقعیت نه کشف تازه ای است و نه به تنهایی گرهی از مشکلات نظام آ

👌175👍1👎1👏1💯1

6 Aug 2026, 09:13 UTC208 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

ممنون از نوجه شما. نشانه‌ای از پویایی یک مجموعه‌ی فکری🙏 اما هنوز به‌گمان بنده مدیری که تنها منتطر گشایش و تغییر در متغیرهای برون‌سازمانی است، پرسش درباره کیفیت و عملکرد را با صراحت موکول به رفع موانع بیرونی می‌داند و حتی پرسش‌کننده را با خطاب و عتاب از پرسش نهی می‌کند، از برچسب بن‌بست‌بینی رهایی نتواند یافت!!! گیرم شما این مصاحبه را تاکتیک وزیر می‌انگارید. اما من نیت‌خوانی نمی‌کنم و مخاطبان یادداشتم را به نص مصاحبه

3

6 Aug 2026, 09:11 UTC197 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

*«در دفاع از نارضایتی صادقانه وزیر آموزش و پرورش ( نقدی بر یادداشت «مسندنشینی و بن‌بست‌بینی») ✍ دکتر قاسم یزدان‌پناه * نوشته‌ی دکتر مهرمحمدی را با دقت خواندم. ایشان از جایگاه یک استادِ نظریه‌پردازِ مطالعات برنامه‌درسی، پرسشِ اخلاقیِ مهمی را مطرح کرده‌اند: «آیا نشستن بر مسند حکمرانی، با ادعای بن‌بست، تناقض ندارد؟» به‌گمانِ من، پاسخِ این پرسش را باید در یک کلمه جست: «تشخیص»؛ نه «بن‌بست». اجازه دهید با صراحتِ یک کار

👏41👎1

6 Aug 2026, 09:09 UTC180 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

وزیر باید پاسخ‌گو باشد، نه مطالبه‌گر نقد سخنان وزیر آموزش‌وپرورش از منظر حکمرانی مطلوب نویسنده: محرم آقازاده در ویدئوی منتشرشده، خبرنگاری از وزیر آموزش‌وپرورش می‌پرسد آیا کیفیت آموزش در ایران در سطح استانداردهای جهانی قرار دارد. وزیر با صراحت پاسخ می‌دهد: «طبیعی است که نیست.» او سپس پایین‌بودن سرانه آموزشی، کمبود منابع مالی، فقدان استانداردهای مناسب نیروی انسانی و وجود کلاس‌های ۳۵ تا ۴۰ نفره را از دلایل این وضعیت معر

👏2

6 Aug 2026, 03:50 UTC197 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
File

*🎙️اپیزود دوازدهم: آزادی در کلاس درس مگه میشه با آزادی دادن به بچه‌ها، اونا رو توی مدرسه و کلاس‌درس مدیریت کرد؟ * از حرفای شهید بهشتی در کتاب نقش آزادی در تربیت کودک تا حرفای آلیسون گوپنیک توی کتاب باغبان و نجار رو به دنبال جواب این سوال، بررسی کردیم. *به نظرم شنیدن این اپیزود، در دنباله بحث امروز، می‌تونه براتون جذاب باشه...* نسخه کامل #اپیزود_دوازدهم رو با زدن لینک زیر بشنوید👇👇 https://tarbiapp.com/takhtesiah/p

3

5 Aug 2026, 15:18 UTC171 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @ayandehnegariamookhtanVideo

📜 ده محور «منشور انقلاب نوین در #نظام_آموزشی» به روایت: «دکتر محمود مهرمحمّدی» 4⃣ فراگرفتن زیست اخلاقی و اجتماعی با #تکنولوژی کاری از: مؤسسه آینده‌نگاری آموختن (#مانا) دست‌اندرکاران: ⚒مدیر تولید: شهاد زمانی ✍به اهتمام: محمد امین سیبویه 🎤گوینده: نسیم افضلی 🎞تدوین: محمدطاها رحیمی 🪄لوگوتایپ: محمدرضا فرزانگان #دکتر_مهرمحمدی #نوآوری_آموزشی #مدرسه_فردا #آینده_نگاری #سواد_دیجیتال #سیاستگذاری_آموزشی #مهارت‌های_زندگی @a

2👏2

5 Aug 2026, 13:55 UTC155 views0 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @danathinktankVideo

مصاحبه اخیر وزیر محترم آموزش‌و‌پرورش در باب کاستی‌ها و جایگاه آموزش عمومی ایران

5 Aug 2026, 13:55 UTC171 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @danathinktank

🔎 یادداشت تحلیلی ✍️ «مسندنشینی و بن‌بست‌بینی!» 🖋 نگاشته‌ی دکتر محمود مهرمحمدی 👤 عضو اندیشکده دانا و استاد حوزه مطالعات برنامه درسی اخیرا گفتگوی کوتاه وزیر محترم آموزش‌وپرورش با اصحاب رسانه در شبکه‌های اجتماعی دست‌به‌دست شد و در میان شهروندانی که دغدغه تعلیم‌‌وتربیت و آینده این مرزوبوم را دارند، بازتاب گسترده‌ای یافت. بازسازی اجمالی صحنه این است که خبرنگار می‌پرسد شما از وضع اموزش‌وپرورش رضایت دارید؟ وزیر در پاسخ

👏72👍1

5 Aug 2026, 03:52 UTC225 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🔻 شماره چهارم مجله مطالعات برنامه درسی در تربیت و بالندگی معلم منتشر شد: بازنگری بر مفهوم و ابعاد عمل‌ تأملی معلمان: یک فراترکیب مفهومی مسعود رامرودی، خلیل غلامی و یحیی معروفی تأثیر تدریس مبتنی بر رویکرد واقعیت‌مدار بر حل مسائل ریاضی پایه ششم ابتدایی مریم موسوی پاکدل طرقبه، حسین جعفری ثانی، مرتضی کرمی و محمدحسین بهرامی رویکرد کوچینگ‌محور در تربیت و توسعه حرفه‌ای معلمان: تحلیل بیبلیومتریک روندها و چشم‌اندازها سمیه

👏1

3 Aug 2026, 19:47 UTC374 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👏5😍3🥰1

2 Aug 2026, 19:18 UTC317 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
File

💠 جلوه‌ها | آموزه‌ها و سیرۀ تربیتی علامه کرباسچیان به روایت صاحب‌نظران ‌ 🎙️ بخش سوم: سخنرانی دکتر محمود مهرمحمدی در همایش «پنجاهمین سالگرد تأسیس مدرسۀ علوی» ‌ ▫️ در شرایطی که برنامه‌های درسی مدارس یکسان هستند تفاوت‌ها از کجا می‌آیند؟! ▫️ باید فرهنگ تربیتی علامه را واکاوی کرد و آن را ارائه داد؛ ▫️ امتداد و تکمیل مسیر علوی ضروری است! ‌ جهت مطالعۀ متن کامل سخنرانی به این لینک مراجعه بفرمایید.

6👏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @zamaneye_ma. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,028,990 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“محمود مهرمحمدی(زمانه‌ی ما)” (@zamaneye_ma), 875 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zamaneye_ma.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.