Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Закупки и право

Channel

Закупки и право

@zakupkiipravo

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

404subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002234431373
TypeChannel
Username@zakupkiipravo
Created28 August 2024measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/zakupkiipravo

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

4034054047 August 2026 — 405 subscribers8 August 2026 — 405 subscribers5 September 2026 — 403 subscribers14 September 2026 — 404 subscribers7 August 202614 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 38 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 403–405 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Sept 2026, 09:21404+1
5 Sept 2026, 21:40403-2
8 Aug 2026, 05:47405no change
7 Aug 2026, 20:04405first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 21 November 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

127 reactions across 15 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍6148.0%
2721.3%
🎉2620.5%
🔥75.51%
😍21.57%
🤝21.57%
👏10.787%
🙏10.787%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 127 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 November 2025 to 25 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

25 Mar 2026, 06:29 UTC217 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Уважаемые коллеги! У нашего журнала появился канал в мессенджере МАХ!

🎉3

16 Mar 2026, 05:14 UTC≈2,140 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
File

⚖️ ЧТО ТАКОЕ ПРЕЙСКУРАНТНЫЙ ДОГОВОР В РЕГЛАМЕНТИРОВАННЫХ ЗАКУПКАХ? Андреева Л.В. О прейскурантном договоре в сфере регламентированных закупок // Закупки и право. 2025. № 1. С. 26–29. В закупках всё чаще используется конструкция, закрывающая типовую «боль» заказчика: объём и сроки заранее неизвестны, но единичные цены определить можно. 📘 Закон № 223-ФЗ допускает более «мягкие» договорные модели, чем 📗 Закон № 44-ФЗ,

👍2

9 Mar 2026, 05:14 UTC306 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
File

🇰🇿 Госзакупки Казахстана в 2025: что нужно знать каждому поставщику Куанова И.З. Государственные закупки в Казахстане: обзор новелл и практики применения // Закупки и право. 2025. №1. С. 108-114. Закон о госзакупках в Казахстане меняется так часто, что уследить за всеми правками почти невозможно. Старый закон редактировали 45 раз, а правила закупок — 60 раз. С 1 января 2025 г. в силу вступил новый закон, который не

👍7

2 Mar 2026, 05:14 UTC≈2,080 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
File

⚖️ КТО ВЫ В СИСТЕМЕ ЗАКУПОК? Бубнова К.В. Критерии идентификации заказчиков в сфере корпоративных закупок // Закупки и право. 2025. № 1. С. 83–88. В закупочном праве сохраняется системная проблема — размытые границы круга заказчиков между 📘 Федеральным законом № 223-ФЗ и 📗 Федеральным законом № 44-ФЗ В результате возникает экстраполяция действия контрактной системы на тех, кто изначально к ней не относился. Разбер

👍8

9 Feb 2026, 04:49 UTC≈2,320 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
File

👨‍⚖️ ПРИНЯТИЕ ОБЕСПЕЧИТЕЛЬНЫХ МЕР ПО 223‑ФЗ: ПРИОСТАНОВЛЕНИЕ ИСПОЛНЕНИЯ ДОГОВОРА Шандиева Н. О. Принятие судом обеспечительных мер в виде приостановления исполнения договора по спорам о признании торгов недействительными в рамках Закона № 223 ФЗ: противоречивая практика правоприменения // Закупки и право. 2025. № 1. С. 73–77. Автор статьи анализирует споры, в которых оспариваются торги по 223‑ФЗ, а заключенный по и

👍3

6 Feb 2026, 04:52 UTC≈2,260 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
File

🔨 ОБЗОР СУДЕБНОЙ ПРАКТИКИ ПО 223-ФЗ Анохина А.А. Обзор судебной практики в сфере закупок товаров, работ, услуг отдельными видами юридических лиц за 2024 год // Закупки и право. 2025 № 1. С. 117-120. 1️⃣ Заказчик в проекте договора ограничил конкуренцию, координируя производителя конкретного товара на этапе исполнения Заказчик требовал согласовывать с ним договоры поставщика с производителями. Антимонопольный орган

👍2👏1😍1

3 Feb 2026, 05:02 UTC302 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
File

ПРЕФЕРЕНЦИАЛЬНЫЕ ЗАКУПКИ VS ВОЗЛОЖЕНИЕ ИСПОЛНЕНИЯ ОБЯЗАТЕЛЬСТВА (TERTIUM NON DATUR) Беляева О.А. Преференциальные закупки vs возложение исполнения обязательства (tertium non datur) // Закупки и право. 2025. № 1. С. 30–33. Автор статьи рассматривает ситуацию, при которой контракт формально получает «льготный» участник, а фактически все делает третье лицо. 📌 Как выглядит ситуация на практике? Контракт заключается с

👍6🔥1

30 Jan 2026, 05:14 UTC≈3,190 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
File

НЕКОТОРЫЕ ПОСЛЕДСТВИЯ ПРИЗНАНИЯ НЕКОНКУРЕНТНЫХ ЗАКУПОК КОНКУРЕНТНЫМИ И НАОБОРОТ (223-ФЗ) 🔨 Тезисы статьи: Исютин-Федотков Д.В. Некоторые последствия признания неконкурентных закупок конкурентными и наоборот // Закупки и право. 2025. № 1. В статье рассматриваются проблемы практики признания неконкурентных способов закупок конкурентными, а также ситуации, когда неконкурентные способы не признаются конкурентными. Отме

3👍3🤝2

31 Dec 2025, 16:50 UTC456 views32 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Уважаемые подписчики! Поздравляем вас с наступающим Новым годом! Желаем вам новых творческих свершений в 2026-м году! 🧐

🎉235👍4

10 Dec 2025, 05:01 UTC≈2,050 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Запись прошедшего 5 декабря 2025 г. XIV Интерактивного круглого стола "Новое в законодательстве о публичных закупках: Закон о контрактной системе и Закон № 223-ФЗ" доступна на Рутубе https://rutube.ru/video/274ab0ddd8e5ae63ef82e190afb69c39/

9👍5

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @zakupkiipravo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Закупки и право” (@zakupkiipravo), 404 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zakupkiipravo.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.