Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Zaklinatel volos

@zaklinatelteam

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

533subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001450737441
TypeChannel
Username@zaklinatelteam
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/zaklinatelteam

Growth

5337 Aug 2026, 13:50 — 533 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 03:50 — 533 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 13:508 Aug 2026, 03:50
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 532–534 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 03:50533no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:50533first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 26 March 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
201
Videos
38
Links
8

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
40s
Average length
20s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

414 reactions across 13 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
29070.0%
🤣389.18%
😁327.73%
🔥235.56%
😍143.38%
👍51.21%
❤‍🔥40.966%
👌40.966%
🥰40.966%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 414reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 26 March 2025 to 16 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

16 Sept 2025, 17:13 UTC≈1,200 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Upd: хозяйка найдена АЛАРМ. Разыскиваем хозяйку куртки. Особые приметы - имеет доступ к санкционке, вкусно пахнет, на стиле. Хозяйка отзовись, иначе загоним и купим себе расходники для работы. 💵💵💵

13😁6

Signed Natasha Sinica

15 Sept 2025, 16:21 UTC≈1,160 views36 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня были закрыты на спецобслуживание. 😆 А порекомендуйте миски красивые и удобные для хвостов. Нашу предыдущую я случайно разбила в рабочем порыве.

25😍7🥰4

Signed Natasha Sinica

17 Jun 2025, 19:58 UTC≈1,350 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

ВНИМАНИЕ ‼️ важное дорожно-экономическое предупреждение**! 🚗💨 С завтрашнего дня в Питере стартует «Экономический форум» — а это значит: 🔹 Министры будут думать, как нам жить лучше. 🔹 Бизнесмены — как заработать больше. 🔹 А водители— как вообще куда-то доехать. 😂 ПРОБКИ как обычно, будут жестокими, поэтому, кто завтра к нам записан, пожалуйста. перед выездом — проверьте навигаторы.

12😁6

Signed Natasha Sinica

15 Apr 2025, 05:45 UTC≈1,850 views54 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Я не знаю откуда родился этот миф, но он очень круто за нами закрепился. Считается у нас очень дорого и мы все высокомерные сучки. Это не правда, во-первых мы не сучки. Сучки не едят из пластиковых контейнеров стоя или на бегу. Во-вторых на прошлой неделе у нас были наращивания за 15 тысяч вместе с волосами и за 100 тысяч. Цена напрямую зависит от количества и качества донорских волос, которые мы будем использовать в

54

Signed Natasha Sinica

15 Apr 2025, 05:30 UTC≈1,240 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Шекотушки по самолюбию like, конечно. Но конкретно этот пункт не соответствует истине, мы даже в тройку самых дорогих не входим. 😂

9

Signed Natasha Sinica

14 Apr 2025, 16:29 UTC≈1,080 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @zlatastolyarovaPhoto

НАРАЩЕННЫЕ ВОЛОСЫ ЗА ИЛИ ПРОТИВ? 🤔 Моя история с наращёнными волосами длится лет 15 точно. Я испробовала ВСЕ виды наращивания от горячего до лент. И я точно за этот способ! И вот каких правил я сейчас придерживаюсь, чтобы мои волосы не только не портились, но и росли под наращёнными: 🤍Не экономить на мастере и материале. Я наращиваю волосы в «Заклинателе волос» и это, пожалуй, одни из самых дорогих ребят в России.

16👌4👍1

Signed Natasha Sinica

2 Apr 2025, 08:23 UTC998 views55 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Коротко о стиле моего управления 😂

🤣3811🔥4😁2

Signed Natasha Sinica

31 Mar 2025, 17:55 UTC≈1,040 views34 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Недавно наткнулась на ребят, два брата делают цветы. Охуенно, на мой взгляд. Все на месте и все друг другу соответствует. Стиль, музыка. Понимаете ход моей мысли? Хочется от своих соц сетей получать удовольствие и визуальный оргазм. А я, в последнее время, получаю только дисфункцию зрительного нерва. И минус в корпоративном бюджете. https://t.me/Base_flowershop

22🔥9😍3

Signed Natasha Sinica

31 Mar 2025, 17:49 UTC909 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Я не договорила 😂😂😂 Если вы снимаете такие рилсы, напишите мне, пожалуйста. в личку с приложением работ, чтобы нам сразу было о чем поговорить, а не только о погоде.

5

Signed Natasha Sinica

31 Mar 2025, 17:47 UTC884 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

😍4

Signed Natasha Sinica

31 Mar 2025, 16:54 UTC982 viewsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

Signed Natasha Sinica

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @zaklinatelteam. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Zaklinatel volos” (@zaklinatelteam), 533 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zaklinatelteam.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.