Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ZAD La Guinguette Vaillante

Channel

ZAD La Guinguette Vaillante

@zad_guinguettevaillante

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

390subscribers

+4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002580045282
TypeChannel
Username@zad_guinguettevaillante
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 13 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/zad_guinguettevaillante

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

3843903877 August 2026 — 386 subscribers7 August 2026 — 386 subscribers15 August 2026 — 384 subscribers29 August 2026 — 385 subscribers6 September 2026 — 390 subscribers7 August 20266 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 31 days, net +4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 383–391 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Sept 2026, 12:58390+5
29 Aug 2026, 17:57385+1
15 Aug 2026, 13:38384-2
7 Aug 2026, 05:13386no change
7 Aug 2026, 00:18386first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 1 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

103 reactions across 11 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤4341.7%
🔥3635.0%
🤬54.85%
👍43.88%
🤣43.88%
❤‍🔥32.91%
👏32.91%
🤯21.94%
😱10.971%
🙈10.971%
🙏10.971%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 103 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 1 January 2026 to 30 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Jun 2026, 07:13 UTC189 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @LGVNONMERCI

Samedi 4 juillet à Bernos-Beaulac 🌞🌡️🚄🌳 Le projet de GPSO n’est pas un projet irréversible Clamons-le haut et fort toutes et tous uni·es dans une chaîne humaine joyeuse et déterminée 👩🏻‍🤝‍👩🏾🧑‍🤝‍🧑👨🏽‍🤝‍👨🏼👫 Cette manifestation, dans un lieu stratégique de la Vallée du Ciron gravement menacé, avec la participation des associations, des collectifs, des communes concerné·es sera un nouveau moment fort de la lutte con…

👍4

30 Jun 2026, 07:13 UTC177 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @LGVNONMERCIPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

24 Apr 2026, 09:25 UTC409 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🌞 Ça se prépare tranquille au soleil pour le week-end à Montauban 🎪 Programme ci dessous

❤5

24 Apr 2026, 09:09 UTC348 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

[ rattrapage] Alors que le COI ( comité d'orientation des infrastructures ) vient de sortir un rapport Acablant sur la LGV Bordeaux Toulouse Dax, les machines continuent de se désarmer sur le chantier à Saint-Jory ⚒ https://www.ladepeche.fr/2026/03/31/trois-engins-pris-pour-cible-lors-de-nouvelles-degradations-sur-le-chantier-de-la-lgv-au-nord-de-toulouse-13302520.php https://attaque.noblogs.org/post/2026/04/01/sa…

❤4

6 Mar 2026, 18:03 UTC≈1,280 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🔥 Décidément il ne fait pas bon être une foreuse et habiter Saint Jory Vu sur iaata.info " On va faire simple: samedi dernier, une foreuse utilisée dans le cadre des travaux pour la LGV Bordeaux Toulouse, a été désarmée à Saint Jory. Une petite lueur, dans la nuit, au coeur de ce projet à 20 milliards d'euros. Leurs machines piétinent nos terres et nos vies pour leur frénésie du profit. De l'A69 et la LGV, nous ref…

🔥11❤5😱1

24 Feb 2026, 21:54 UTC≈1,420 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🔦 A propos des lumières stroboscopiques et des sirènes Je réfute, tu réfutes, nous réfutons 🙈 On n'allait pas en faire une série tv. Mais dans la presse, la préfecture et la gendarmerie se conchient dans la négation de l'utilisation de lumières stroboscopiques lors de Guinguette 7 contre les ecureuilles. Rien de surprenant, c'est dans l'air du temps. 🎨 Du coup des artistes peintres sont aussi allé•es réfuter ferm…

❤11🤣4🔥1

11 Feb 2026, 11:03 UTC≈1,270 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

La journaliste Charlotte Vautier a bataillé pour nous suivre quelques jours en aout dernier dans une situation précaire. Nous n'avions plus de zad au sol après une énième expulsion et des copaines étaient en GAV puis en prison . Pas facile d'aborder un sujet méconnu et mal compris surtout dans ce contexte, bien ouej et merci . Lien du docu : https://youtu.be/kR_JiuA9Dag?si=GjHlI-msJi9V6deX

❤12👏2

11 Feb 2026, 11:01 UTC≈1,010 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Pendant Guinguette 7, des gendarmes ont encore montré l'étendue de leur bêtise. Des pratiques qui ont été dénoncées maintes fois par l'ONU lors de l'a69. Bonnet sur les yeux et boules quies, les copaines ont quand même tapé leurs meilleures nuits 😘

🤬5🤯2

11 Feb 2026, 10:52 UTC809 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Bon on aura mis presque autant de temps à faire ce post depuis l'expulsion, que la durée de vie de Guinguette 7. 4 jours, guinguette express. 🧐 Pour cette semaine on attendait un arrêté préfectoral portant autorisation de coupes pour des sondages archéologiques. Du coup, on s'est organisé•es sur le pouce et on a fait passer nos plus belles palettes par dessus le nouveau portail de la SNCF sensé barrer la route à la…

🔥10❤4🙏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @zad_guinguettevaillante. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ZAD La Guinguette Vaillante” (@zad_guinguettevaillante), 390 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zad_guinguettevaillante.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.