Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ни стыда, ни совести

Channel

ни стыда, ни совести

@zaaadmipr

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

245subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001431557666
TypeChannel
Username@zaaadmipr
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/zaaadmipr

Growth

244245244.56 August 2026 — 244 subscribers7 August 2026 — 244 subscribers14 August 2026 — 245 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 9 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 244–245 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 21:55245+1
7 Aug 2026, 02:31244no change
6 Aug 2026, 06:06244first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 9 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
43.2%
avg views ÷ 245 subscribers
Avg views / post
106
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
20.0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 14 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held14 (9 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total1,058
Reactions total212
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 02:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

297 reactions across 14 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥8327.9%
7525.3%
😁6521.9%
3712.5%
🗿113.70%
🤯93.03%
🏆62.02%
💯62.02%
💅51.68%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 297reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 15:53 UTC20 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @punchrprPhoto

Когда пытаетесь доказать клиенту, что стратегия была верная, и вы честно честно закроете KPI за три дня 🙏

😁6🔥5🤯2

5 Aug 2026, 09:19 UTC48 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Когда негатив становится кризисом и что с этим делать? Не обязательно быть бизнесом масштаба WB или «Додо», чтобы столкнуться с репутационным кризисом. Кризис в целом редко начинается сразу с чего-то громкого. А когда компания понимает, что ситуация серьёзная, новость уже разошлась, клиенты возмущены, а сотрудники не знают, что можно говорить. Но и собирать антикризисный штаб из-за каждого гневного комментария — н

🔥866

3 Aug 2026, 09:36 UTC71 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Жду всех на мит, будем обсуждать текущие задачи, летучка проходит ориентировочно 2 дня❤️😊💐

😁13🗿3

29 Jul 2026, 09:43 UTC132 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Коллеги, ни на что не намекаю, просто хвастаюсь🐷

🔥1310

29 Jul 2026, 07:56 UTC133 views27 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Вчера был день пиарщика. В этом году много интерактивов вышло к празднику (возможно, я так думаю каждый год). Пиарщики проходили тест, уживутся ли в команде со звездными пиарщиками. Заполняли бинго отношений пиарщика и журналиста. Все, что бесит, отправляли в шредер. Из исследований узнали, что пиарщики связывают профессию с любовью, а не выгоранием. Но выгорали все-таки 95%. А здесь исследование о домашних животны

11🔥97

27 Jul 2026, 12:16 UTC119 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Всегда говори «нет» Я вернулась в терапию с психологом. Основной запрос — совсем не могу отдохнуть. Если откладываю рабочие задачи, не отдыхаю. И когда пытаюсь отдыхать, тоже не отдыхаю. Причин много, но главная — попытка контролировать даже неконтролируемое. И не отказываться от доп нагрузки. Психолог дал задание примерно 7 раз за неделю кому-то отказать, но чтобы это был значимый отказ. Я вообще сначала не понял

5😁5

24 Jul 2026, 09:41 UTC131 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Правильная мотивация — залог качественного результата🙏

😁11💯6🔥6

21 Jul 2026, 14:03 UTC131 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Каждый предприниматель хочет в Forbes В большинстве входящих заявок на работу со СМИ есть упоминание Forbes, РБК, Ведомостей или Коммерсанта. Желание понятно и реалистично, но не может быть единственной целью для эффективной работы. Поэтому стратегии никто не отменял: практикоориентированные, конечно, не файлик на сотню слайдов с буквами. Тогда становится понятно, для чего компании нужны СМИ и какие, а может и не н

6🏆6🔥6

20 Jul 2026, 09:49 UTC154 views34 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Мы запускаем трекер! Я протестировала больше 15 трекеров для ведения проектов. Есть нюанс: проекты в PR отличаются по планированию, из-за этого возникают сложности. — Журналисты могут не отвечать. Из-за этого затягиваются процессы, переносятся дедлайны. Влияние менеджера в этих задачах снижается, хотя задача остается. — От статьи редакция может отказаться в любой момент. Опыт с журналистами распространяется на каж

🔥149🤯74

17 Jul 2026, 10:19 UTC119 views28 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Во время рабочего созвона на фоне у коллеги наблюдаете такую слежку. Ваши действия?

😁12🗿8💅53

17 Jul 2026, 08:24 UTC132 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Как коммуникации должны влиять на бизнес Глобальная цель, которую я себе ставлю в коммуникациях — делать их более управляемыми, чтобы влияние на бизнес было более очевидным. В первую очередь, конечно, можно подумать о продажах: больше лидов → больше денег. Результат очевиден. Пиарщики вынуждены действовать витеевато. Поэтому мы активно тестируем разные форматы работы, например: — собираем обратную связь от отделов

9🔥75

16 Jul 2026, 15:35 UTC112 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Контент есть, лидов нет: где бизнес теряет клиентов Компании, у которых есть живой блог, соцсети, рассылка, часто сталкиваются с одной и той же проблемой: активности много, а заявок и продаж нет. Обычно дело не в качестве и количестве контента. Дело в том, что контент живет отдельно от бизнеса. В статье для Т-Бизнес Секретов рассказала, почему так происходит💅

7🔥65

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @zaaadmipr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,019,875 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ни стыда, ни совести” (@zaaadmipr), 245 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zaaadmipr.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.