Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

За Можай! | Можайский район

@za_mozhai

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

4,427subscribers

+44 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001745387778
TypeChannel
Username@za_mozhai
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/za_mozhai

Growth

4,3834,4274,4056 August 2026 — 4,383 subscribers6 August 2026 — 4,383 subscribers9 August 2026 — 4,425 subscribers12 August 2026 — 4,427 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net +44. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,376–4,434 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 04:544,427+2
9 Aug 2026, 08:084,425+42
6 Aug 2026, 13:364,383no change
6 Aug 2026, 07:174,383first reading

Engagement

7 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
45.1%
avg views ÷ 4,427 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,000
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.83%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 7 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held7 (31 July 20268 August 2026)
Views total13,978
Reactions total396
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 18:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 48s
Average length
56s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

354 reactions across 6 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤬7320.6%
💯5716.1%
🕊5615.8%
🤡359.89%
👍246.78%
195.37%
185.08%
😱185.08%
💔143.95%
👏102.82%
😢61.69%
🔥51.41%
🤨51.41%
😁41.13%
🤯41.13%
🤣20.565%
🍌10.282%
👀10.282%
😭10.282%
🤔10.282%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 396reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 08:14 UTC758 views45 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Позор участковому А.В. Билецкому! Систематические нарушения ОВД Можайского района продолжаются... Прошло почти полгода, как после скандала в Совете депутатов, на личном приеме активистов Жилина и Козлова начальник ОВД Можайского Потапов выдал потерянные участковым Билецким отказы в возбуждении дел и направил дела на повторное рассмотрение. И вот история повторяется... В июле на вызове полиции Билецкому был задан во

💯27🤬10🤨52😱1

7 Aug 2026, 08:22 UTC≈4,200 views50 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Несколько минут назад (11:16 7 августа) произошел какой-то взрыв в нашей округе, ЗАО Москвы. Соседи слышали и на Барвихинской, и на Боженко. Отмечают, что затрясся даже потолок. Делитесь, кто слышал и в курсе 👇🏻 Upd. Пишут, что взрыв слышали и в Подмосковье, и в других округах Москвы Upd.upd. Мониторинговый канал RADAD-RF сообщает, что звук был от самолета, превысившего сверхзвуковой барьер ЗА МОЖАЙ! в ТГ Не груз

💯30😱112🤬2😁2🍌1👍1🤔1

6 Aug 2026, 09:49 UTC≈1,710 views102 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Канал Префектуры ЗАО, а следом и околоуправские паблики бодро рапортуют о планах благоустройства природного заказника Долина реки Сетунь в части Можайского района На фото недавнего обхода заказника и обсуждения проекта засветились глава Управы Можайского Мазанов, местные депутаты-единоросы Чамовских и Лыткин и кандидат в депутаты ГД единорос Попов с молодыми ребятами — на жителей не похожи? Казалось бы, такая новос

🕊56🤡316🔥3👏2😁2👀1😭1

5 Aug 2026, 08:02 UTC≈1,320 views90 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Вчера в Рублеве начали снос дореволюционного дома Соседи из Рублева делятся нашей общей болью: Сегодня начался снос одного из старейших и наиболее ценных исторических зданий посёлка Рублёво, дома № 19 на улице Василия Ботылёва. Здание было построено в 1904 году по проекту известного московского архитектора Максима Карловича Геппенера. Первоначально оно служило казармой для рабочих Рублёвской водопроводной станции и

🤬57💔14😢6😱6🤯4🔥21

3 Aug 2026, 13:33 UTC≈1,730 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

На Беловежской сделают 218 парковочных мест, а автобусные остановки «Поликлиника» и «Беловежская, 19» перенесут — Дептранс В продолжение темы «благоустройства» Беловежской, свой комментарий газете «ЗА МОЖАЙ!» прислал Дептранс Москвы. Похвалим их за редкий по нынешним меркам подробный ответ на наши вопросы. Прочитать можете на скрине. Помимо информации о парковочных местах вдоль улицы, новых пешеходных переходах и Н

👍107🤡4

1 Aug 2026, 08:48 UTC≈2,480 views46 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

В соседнем Фили-Давыдково произвол частных управляющих компаний — жители Давыдковской, 10 делают ставку на огласку Еще по Лужковской программе переселения, а также частично по реновации, жители стали заселяться в ЖК в конце 2023 года. Из-за нарушений при приемке Жилищник принимать дом в управление не стал, конкурс выиграла компания «Рерик». Собственников она не устраивает. С тех пор жители провели несколько успешны

18👍13👏8🤬4🤣21

31 Jul 2026, 07:26 UTC≈1,780 views42 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Кандидат в депутаты Госдумы Сергей Митрохин активно освещает «благоустройство» столичных улиц и дворов «Благоустройство по-бирюковски» (по фамилии зама Собянина по вопросам ЖКХ) разрушительно и неспешно идет и в Можайском районе. Так, например, уже три недели выглядит остановка «Беловежская, 19». Расковыряв все за пару дней, рабочие испарились и теперь жители вынуждены ежедневно проходить полосу препятствий. Особенн

Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @za_mozhai. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 331,020 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“За Можай! | Можайский район” (@za_mozhai), 4,427 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/za_mozhai.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.