❓چرا مدام از اینکه همسرم بهم خیانت کنه میترسم؟! 🖇برای ریشه یابی🎙 🦋@zahra_rhiminasab
❤6👍4👏1

Channel
@z_rahiminasab
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
369subscribers
+11 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001845299755 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @z_rahiminasab |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/z_rahiminasab |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 15:47 | 369 | +11 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:35 | 358 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:24 | 358 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 2 June 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 May 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
212 reactions across 19 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 129 | 60.8% | |
| 👍 | 42 | 19.8% | |
| 👏 | 20 | 9.43% | |
| 👌 | 11 | 5.19% | |
| 💯 | 5 | 2.36% | |
| ❤🔥 | 3 | 1.42% | |
| 🎉 | 2 | 0.943% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 212reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 2 June 2024 to 14 May 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
❓چرا مدام از اینکه همسرم بهم خیانت کنه میترسم؟! 🖇برای ریشه یابی🎙 🦋@zahra_rhiminasab
❤6👍4👏1
💭به عنوان یک زوج درمانگر از اهمیت همزمان به رخت خواب رفتن اینو بگم که: 📌تحقیقات نشون داده زوج هایی که زمان خواب شون هماهنگ نیست،رضایت کمتری از رابطه عاطفی و زندگی جنسی شون گزارش میکنن... 🖇پس نگو؛تو بخواب،من بعدا(فیلم_فوتبال_اسکرول کردن اکسپلور و... تموم بشه)میام فاصله زمان خواب ،فاصله دل ها رو زیاد میکنه...🚶♀️ 🦋@zahra_rhiminasab
👍5❤4❤🔥3👏1
💭از همخونگی تا عشق❤️🔥 چطور رابطه مون رو زنده کنیم؟! 🎧#پادکست 🦋@zahra_rhiminasab
❤7👏2👍1
💭بنظرت اون اولین آدمی که دوستش داشتی، یا اون آهنگ ها و فیلم های رمانتیکی که در دوران نوجوانی با دقت دنبالشون میکردی، یا رابطه عاطفی مامان و بابات و مدل برخوردشون باهم دیگه چقدر روی تصورات و باور های تو از (عشق و رابطه عاطفی)اثرگذار بوده؟! 🎧این پادکست رو خودم خیلی دوست دارم،تو هم از دستش نده♥️🦋 #زهرا_رحیمی_نسب #پادکست 🦋@zahra_rhiminasab
❤5👍5👌2👏2
💭دوستی ازم پرسید چطور میتونم رابطه خوب و صمیمی با همسرم داشته باشم؟ در جواب گفتم:برای صمیمیت و رابطه خوب خیلی کار ها و رفتار ها میشه انجام داد،یکیش تجربه گفت و گوهای عمیق با همدیگه است... پروفسور ماتیاس مل Matthias Mehl و تیم تحقیقاتی شون در دانشگاه آریزونا آمریکا،بررسی کردن که آیا گفت و گوهای ما در(رابطه عاطفی)در سلامت روان مون و صمیمیت مون تاثیر میزاره یا نه؟! پژوهشگر ها به 79شرکت کننده که مشغول زندگی روزمره خودش…
❤8👌3👍1👏1
6 جولای روز جهانی(بوسه) بود. میخوام براتون از فواید بوسه عاشقانه روی مغز،جسم و روان بگم... بوس عاشقانه یا بوسه 6ثانیه ای: چرا 6ثانیه؟ چون هورمون اکسی توسین در 6ثانیه تولید میشه 📌 بوسه در بدن دوپامین ترشح میکنه در نتیجه باعث میشه رگ های خونی گشاد تر بشن و مغز اکسیژن بیشتری دریافت کنه برای همین بوسه عاشقانه پر از حس خوبه. بوسه سطح آنتی بادی بدن رو افزایش میده و سیستم ایمنی بدن رو تقویت میکنه. و همچنین 5عصب از 12عصب …
❤8👍2👏2👌1
امروز تولدمه 🎊🦋 و به بهانه این روز، باهاتون راجع به پدیده جهانی و روانشناختی( birthday blues =غم تولد) صحبت کردم. 🖇برای شناخت و درک احساسات خودمون و دیگران 🦋@zahra_rhiminasab
❤12🎉2👌1👍1
#استوری برام نوشتین هم خانم ها و هم اقایون احساسی هستن ولی آقایون احساسات شون رو پنهان میکنن... پاسخم رو بخونید✌🏻🦋
❤8👌1👏1
⁉️خانم ها احساساتی تر هستن یا آقایون؟ 🖇طبق پژوهش های آدرین بلتز( استاد دانشگاه میشیگان آمریکا) به این مسئله پرداختم🌱 🦋@zahra_rhiminasab
❤6👌2👍2
🔴pms و ams👫 لطفا با بلوغ و درک از جنس مخالف به این ویس گوش کنید🦋🙌🏻 🦋@zahra_rhiminasab
❤6👍2👌1👏1
🔴نگاهی به روز دهم چالش سواد عاطفی و درس دهم ❓از کجا بفهمیم دوره سوگ رابطه قبلی مون تموم شده و آمادگی رابطه جدید رو داریم؟ 📌به این موضوع هم پرداختیم که،چطوری میتونیم از حالِ بد دوران سوگ راحت تر عبور کنیم!! 🦋@zahra_rhiminasab
❤6👍3👏1💯1
🔴نگاهی به روز نهم چالش سواد عاطفی و درس نهم ❓اگر با فرد دیگه برم توی رابطه ممکنه که حالم یکم بهتر بشه؟2ماهه کات کردم و حالم خوب نیست. 🦋@zahra_rhiminasab
❤7👍3💯1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @z_rahiminasab. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 229,642 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@z_rahiminasab named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“زهرا رحیمی نسب|روانشناسی” (@z_rahiminasab), 369 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/z_rahiminasab.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.