Nekogram/cherrygram最近出现了点风波?暂时停止使用吧,观望一段时间 https://t.me/fangliye_archive https://t.me/c/1158333230/893824

Channel
ccdyz
@yzccdyz
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
16subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003663786163 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @yzccdyz |
| Description | 两只影子 |
| Created | 29 January 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/yzccdyz |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 22:30 | 16 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:33 | 16 | first reading |
Engagement
5 posts held, back to 29 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Links
- 2
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
5 reactions across 2 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2 | 40.0% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 40.0% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 20.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 29 January 2026 to 2 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
两个覆盖100%的中文包,应该是无广告 https://t.me/setlanguage/withal https://t.me/setlanguage/zh-hans-raw
👎1
最近Telegram更改了登录政策,新版本的官方客户端需要付费才能登录,如果想登录官方客户端,可以先安装旧版本进行登录(前提是有一个登录中的客户端用于接收应用内的验证码) 在未登录任何客户端的情况下,如果你的TG号绑定了邮箱,也可以通过 Telega 填手机号来接收邮箱验证码登录,然后再登录其他客户端。 #Telegram #登录
❤2🥰2
Channel photo updated
Channel created
Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @yzccdyz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ccdyz” (@yzccdyz), 16 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yzccdyz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.