Channel
@yyds3391
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
502subscribers
+52 since we began measuring on 21 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004410852280 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @yyds3391 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 11 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 21 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 21 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 21 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/yyds3391 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 21 Aug 2026, 17:54 | 502 | +52 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 03:15 | 450 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 11 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 13 (11 July 2026 – 15 August 2026) |
| Views total | 5,254 |
| Reactions total | 6 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 21 Aug 2026, 03:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
9 reactions across 3 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 88.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 8 | 88.9% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 11.1% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
【时间】：2026-08-15 【老师】：啵菜 【留名】：zzzz cccc 【人照】：9.5 【颜值】：9.6 【身材】：9.5 【服务】：9.6 【态度】：9.6 【环境】：9.5 【综合】：9.55 【过程】：周五夜课cj，老师遥控上楼，进门后交了水费，老师带着洗澡，服侍洗全身，进房之后，老师先来了个整套服务，口的肌肉都在收缩，赶紧戴套出水，中间休息老师买了小零食，补充休息好，进行第二次，也是女上出水。困意十足就早早睡下了，早上走前最后一次出水，令人意犹未尽。整体老师可可爱爱，细节到位，非常棒的一次cj体验 ✳️Powered by @whkdyyy
啵菜的朋友圈 pinned «如有，想🈚套，或者故意拔套的勿扰，如发现，直接报强J处理»
如有，想🈚套，或者故意拔套的勿扰，如发现，直接报强J处理
Photo, posted without a caption
哪个好
❤3👍1
Photo, posted without a caption
❤2
---【💕基础信息】--- 时间：2026-07-14 老师：啵菜 狼友：城北000000lan ---【👙形象打分】--- 颜值：10 身材：10 态度：10 综合：10 ---【📝服务过程】--- 楼下接的妹妹 见面感觉就很好，人照无差，进门交了水费抽了一根烟缓解尴尬的氛围，然后一起洗澡，洗的时候很仔细，后面就上床开始服务，妹妹口活无敌好，主要是态度好，你不说停就不会停，口了最少有个十分钟吧，然后一水开始，妹妹女上开始，技术好态度好，过程不赘述，出水之后休息了一会儿，妹妹又开始前戏，口的很认真，我都以为我岁数大了硬不起来第二次了，又被我口硬了，二次开始后入出水，感觉时间快到了反正也没有催，出水洗了个澡聊了会儿天抽了支烟结束，相当nice 【优点】：态度好 服务好 身材好 【缺点/建议】：暂无 【个人评价总结】：值得二刷 ❤️ 工兵团群友审美各不同，吾之蜜糖，彼之砒霜。不合适直接掉头。
❤3
【时间】：2026-07-19 【老师】：啵菜 【留名】：Young Kirk 【人照】：10 【颜值】：10 【身材】：10 【服务】：10 【态度】：10 【环境】：10 【综合】：10 【过程】：在武汉出差抱着试试看的心态联系了啵菜老师。虽然CJ途中多走了许多冤枉路，但是在老师的指引下顺利地来到了目的地。 老师本人比照片可爱多了，萝莉身材。还没开始洗浴弟弟就不控制的立起来了。 老师仔细的帮我擦拭了AB面。到了床上，口活是真厉害。没多少实战经验的哪受得了这般，赶紧让老师暂停下缓缓。 之后老师进行了女上位，哇，没几下就缴械了。太厉害了。也怪自己太敏感了。 总结来说算是目前为止最厉害的老师。无论是颜值还是功夫，之后来武汉还得继续来找啵菜老师。 ✳️Powered by @whkdyyy
开课
台风哪里去了
开课
【时间】：2026-07-11 【老师】：啵菜 【留名】：Margaret Fry 【人照】：9 【颜值】：9 【身材】：9 【服务】：9 【态度】：9 【环境】：9 【综合】：9 【过程】：是新人刚下海的，有时间马上预约了，到了之后果然没让我失望，人照一致，身材均称，颜值长在我的审美上，房间环境也很好，话不多说先交水费一起共浴，妹妹给我二弟吹得爽翻天了，忍住赶紧洗完澡出来，胸目测c杯吧，妹妹开始调情我，灵活的舌头舔着我敏感的龟头，拿着我的棒棒上下舔着，细致的吸着，我差点就忍不住了，直接带上tt插进去，妹妹的身体上下动着而她的奶子也跟着摇晃，我再用手抓住她的奶子，她也随着我的猛烈插干而淫荡的叫着，做起来太爽了，最后后入出货，真实评价，下次必反食 ✳️Powered by @whkdyyy
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @yyds3391. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,101,827 of 1,621,754entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“啵菜的朋友圈” (@yyds3391), 502 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yyds3391.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.