Channel
@yurchik_dsgn
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
557subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003472080373 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @yurchik_dsgn |
| Created | Between 1 November 2025 and 4 February 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/yurchik_dsgn |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 13:13 | 557 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:35 | 556 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:29 | 556 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 4 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
327 reactions across 18 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 92.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 303 | 92.7% | |
| 💔 | 24 | 7.34% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 327reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 4 February 2026 to 25 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @yurchik_dsgn. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 February 2026 to 25 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Если по-русски - навайбкодил бота. Он нарезает ваши видосы и пикчи на эмодзи и позволяет собирать из них вот такие картиночки. Потребность родилась, когда делал коммерческий кейс: руками резать задолбался, а всё, что есть в паблике, - либо урезано по функционалу, либо с интерфейсом слишком зуммерским. Поэтому собрал свой, с интуитивным +- интерфейсом. Первые 100 пользователей получают 500 поинтов (надолго хватит). …
❤12
🟦🟦🟦🟦 🟦🟦🟦🟦 🟦🟦🟦🟦🟦🟦 🟦🟦🟦🟦🟦EmojiBot 🟦🟦🟦🟦🟦version 0.100 🟦🟦🟦🟦🟦🟦 🟦🟦🟦🟦🟦🟦 🟦🟦🟦🟦 при поддержке Клод Кодик version 0.100 - @EmjiGrid_bot🟦 пользуйтесь на здоровье.🟦 //позволяет нарезать видео и изображения на паки emoji 🟦🟦🟦🟦🟦🟦🟦 🟦🟦🟦🟦🟦 🟦🟦🟦🟦🟦🟦🟦 🟦🟦🟦🟦🟦
❤13
Сколько говна получил Яндекс за редизайн Яндекс Музыки - судя по Threads. Стоит только сделать что-то смелое, выходящее за рамки перемещения кнопок по UI, - сразу ешь говно от «экспертов», у которых в портфолио сплошные шедевры в стиле Рубиханс. То же самое встретило и недавнее «стекло» от Apple: выглядело свежо и смело, но быстро дали заднюю после нытья. Грустно, что классные решения выкупают только спустя время …
❤19
падпищеки, спецаиально для вас кусок будущего рилса эксклюзивом но это не значит, что его не нужно будет смотреть - с вас по два просмотра после дропа
❤29💔2
Video, posted without a caption
❤23
Странно наблюдать, что происходит с Midjourney. Когда-то это был главный инструмент для AI-картинок. Нужно красиво, кинематографично, дорого - идёшь в MJ. У модели был вкус. И, честно, он до сих пор есть. Но стоит Google прикрутить к Nano Banana функцию moodboard’ов, как у MJ, - и, кажется, можно будет забывать про старую добрую Midjourney. Nano Banana выглядит уже не просто как генератор красивых картинок, а как …
💔5❤4
Video message, posted without a caption
❤7
Photo, posted without a caption
Рилсик новый леплю
❤23
😁😆😁 ывфыволфвыфй
💔12
0 постов за месяц. Как вам? На самом деле нужно было плотно поработать над проектами, чтобы обеспечить себя «Доброй колой» на пару месяцев. Проект для «Лиги Ставок» оставлю вам кусочек здесь.
❤25
Голливуд забанил возможность использовать Seedance 2 на большинстве ИИ-агрегаторов, но на локальных сервисах им по-прежнему можно пользоваться и делать такие прикалюхи. Лично потестил — всё работает: модель хорошо подхватывает движение камеры и переносит стилистику с референса. Всё ближе к высокой степени контроля над результатом генераций, и ето здорово
❤13
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @yurchik_dsgn. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 1,021,049 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“yurchik#dsgn” (@yurchik_dsgn), 557 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yurchik_dsgn.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.