Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Юлия | про онлайн специальности и заработок

Channel

Юлия | про онлайн специальности и заработок

@yuliaslinkova

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

122subscribers

+46 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003870669573
TypeChannel
Username@yuliaslinkova
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/yuliaslinkova

Growth

76122996 August 2026 — 76 subscribers9 August 2026 — 76 subscribers15 August 2026 — 122 subscribers6 August 202615 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 9 days, net +46. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 69–129 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 06:27122+46
9 Aug 2026, 20:4576no change
6 Aug 2026, 17:3176first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 21 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
33.5%
avg views ÷ 122 subscribers
Avg views / post
40.9
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
28.4%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 13 of 15 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held15 (21 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total613
Reactions total167
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 20:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

167 reactions across 13 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
6035.9%
🔥4828.7%
👍3018.0%
74.19%
🕊63.59%
🤝52.99%
42.40%
❤‍🔥42.40%
🥰31.80%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 167reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 17:53 UTC8 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

— Нужно ли вести соц. сети? — Какие есть онлайн-профессии? — Как проходит обучение? — Тарифы обучения (обучение на куратора + онлайн-профессии) — Доступ к обучению по инфографике ▪️Задать вопрос/приобрести обучение - @yulia815

🔥3

5 Aug 2026, 14:06 UTC36 views11 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

7❤‍🔥4

5 Aug 2026, 13:58 UTC32 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026

И это самая малость того что есть Твой шанс попробовать зависит только от тебя 🤗

6

5 Aug 2026, 13:57 UTC30 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

+ 104.350 ₽ за ИЮЛЬ 🔥 На услугах по инфографике ❤️ Занимаюсь дизайном карточек инфографики и нейроконтентом для маркетплейсов ✨ Пару месяцев назад ушла из найма и спокойно в своих комфортных условиях работаю прямо из дома 🥹 Благодарю проект за эти возможности ❤️

6

5 Aug 2026, 13:57 UTC17 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

+55.469₽ ЗА ИЮЛЬ🩷 С дизайна социальных сетей, упаковки сообществ и оформления🙈 Это мой второй активный месяц работы в проекте, и если честно, я не ожидала, что можно зарабатывать реально прямо с телефона При этом, я достаточно много отдыхала, тк в этом месяце сдавала диплом🙂‍↕️ Работаю дизайнером социальных сетей, обожаю это направление!🚀

4

5 Aug 2026, 13:57 UTC16 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

+311 800 ₽ 🥹✨ Мне 21 год, и я дизайнер социальных сетей. Это мой первый такой результат. 🔥 Если бы мне пару месяцев назад сказали, что я буду зарабатывать такие суммы, я бы просто не поверила. Но сейчас это моя реальность. Я могу работать и больше не переживать о том, чем платить за квартиру и другие расходы. Спасибо проекту за эту возможность. 🥹🫶

5 Aug 2026, 13:56 UTC8 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

«Боюсь, это слишком сложно, у меня точно не выйдет» ❗️ Знакомая фраза Часто слышу её от тех, кто хочет начать зарабатывать прямо с телефона. И я вас прекрасно понимаю — тревога здесь абсолютно нормальна. Сама через неё проходила, когда только входила во фриланс: «А вдруг близкие не поддержат? А вдруг вложусь и останусь в минусе? А вдруг потрачу недели, а результат будет нулевой?» — и так по кругу. Но знаете, к как

1

5 Aug 2026, 13:56 UTC10 viewsread 9 August 2026

♦️♦️♦️ А вот и результаты тех кто рискнул👇

24 Jul 2026, 20:51 UTC55 views11 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Почему вы до сих пор не изменили свою жизнь? ☕️Вы пьете утренний кофе, смотрите в окно и снова думаете о переменах Мне каждый день в директ поступают одни и те же сообщения: • «Хочу всё изменить» • «Нужны деньги» • «Надоело выживать от зарплаты до зарплаты» Но проходит месяц Потом второй Потом год А жизнь остается прежней Почему? 🚫 Дело совсем не в лени Главная причина, которая держит вас на месте — страх сделат

🔥65

21 Jul 2026, 08:18 UTC93 views47 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Если тебя так же мотивируют такие результаты и ты хочешь изменить своё финансовое положение и даже ощутить лучшие перемены в своей жизни Тогда смело пиши мне в личку 📩 @yulia815 я помогу определиться с выбором, если ещё до сих пор не знаешь с чего начать А также проведу за ручку, но от тебя желание и конечно же действия ✅ Всё об онлайн направлениях ✅ Выбрать тариф Связь со мной по любому вопросу @yulia815 #инстар

👍1815🔥14

21 Jul 2026, 08:13 UTC78 views28 reactionsread 9 August 2026

И это все обычные девушки (и не только) которые дали себе возможность просто попробовать и приложили немного усилий. Но благодаря своему хотению и упорству имеют свои личные 💸💸💸 и стремление к лучшему 🤗

🔥117🕊64

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @yuliaslinkova. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 436,838 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Юлия | про онлайн специальности и заработок” (@yuliaslinkova), 122 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yuliaslinkova.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.