Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Yulia Leya Есть мечты, будут и путешествия)

@yulia_leya

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

159subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001511124396
TypeChannel
Username@yulia_leya
DescriptionЖизнь, картинки, Музыка
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 31 January 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/yulia_leya

Growth

1597 August 2026 — 159 subscribers8 August 2026 — 159 subscribers7 August 20268 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 158–160 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 17:31159no change
7 Aug 2026, 03:46159first reading

Engagement

5 posts held, back to 19 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
142.9%
avg views ÷ 159 subscribers
Avg views / post
227
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.99%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 5 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 July 2026
Posts held5 (19 July 202628 July 2026)
Views total1,136
Reactions total34
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 17:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,340
Videos
829
Links
135

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1m 32s
Average length
46s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

34 reactions across 5 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥1647.1%
🥰617.6%
411.8%
👍411.8%
🌭12.94%
🎉12.94%
👏12.94%
🙏12.94%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 34reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 28 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Jul 2026, 11:23 UTC48 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Magic carpet состоялся в прошлую субботу это был для меня новый опыт - играть за вечер два сета почти подряд, первый три часа и второй в Лузере - 1,5 часа Спасибо всем за поддержку, от усталости у меня подгибались ножки, но ваши задорные танцы окрывали меня 2,3,4,5 дыхания)) следующая остановка в моем гастрольном лете - тссс пока это секрет

2🔥2👏1

22 Jul 2026, 17:13 UTC836 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

✨ MAGIC CARPET ✨ 25 июля с 21:00 до 02:00 бар «Лузер» превратится в пространство, где электронная музыка встретится с этническими мотивами со всего мира. Мы приглашаем вас отправиться в музыкальный трип от шоу-кейса Magic Carpet — волшебном ковре, сотканном из глубоких электронных ритмов, атмосферных мелодий и фолковых мотивов разных культур. Вас будут сопровождать: 🎧 DJ Meskaline & Lakshmi 🎧 DJ Yulia Leya 🎧 DJ Marin

🔥3🥰3👍2

20 Jul 2026, 16:48 UTC72 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

#красотадня Сегодня часам к трем слишком хорошая погода выманила меня от компа купаться Лежать и смотреть снизу вверх на березу Читать книжку про кошечек и благодарить моего личного Бога, что все хорошо, еда есть и близкие не болеют

🥰2👍1🔥1

20 Jul 2026, 09:31 UTC81 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

С юбилеем мою любимую бабушку 95! баба ягодка опять Бабушка была ребенком в войну, очень много переезжала по всей стране как жена офицера, даже жила в Берлине 8 лет Люблю тебя, ба

🔥7👍1🥰1🙏1

19 Jul 2026, 11:23 UTC99 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

И поехали! Фото и видеоотчет с моего выступления на Искрах Лошадь вы уже видели, коней не было Я играла в сб в 14.00 И публика была очень отзывчивая, погода прекрасная Ветер с Ладоги и полное ощущение морского побережья Танцуй, звучи, живи! P.s. Отдельное спасибо dj Synergia https://t.me/DJ_synergia за такую красивую сцену с говорящим названием «Место силы» и за то, что позвала в лайнап #искрыфестиваль #искры #искр

🔥32🌭1🎉1

Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @yulia_leya. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 572,348 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Yulia Leya Есть мечты, будут и путешествия)” (@yulia_leya), 159 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yulia_leya.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.