我其實從第一次看13🃏的動畫就在想了 如果Fedor每次召喚他們,他們都有機率變成女生或男生,或是無性別,會不會很有趣?就像你永遠不知道你的麵糰最後會變成什麼樣的餅乾。 😼 我喜歡碰運氣的抽籤遊戲。 (可以加上限制:一天只能召喚3次) 例如: Fedor今天想要一個強壯的男性克隆人替他贏得足球賽。 他選擇了Pik,因為他最強壯! 結果Pik以性感的大胸部女孩的姿態出現,Fedor嚇到了,而Pik很不滿意這個身體,兩個人對著彼此尖叫。
![Telegram profile photo for yuki8563 PlayCard🃏👑[16+]](https://cdn.tgregister.com/av/36/36283654fa3b28aaf5531a6eb0d3a93ed4f8d54a9b12b0a42cdb5188f3771556.jpg)
Channel
yuki8563 PlayCard🃏👑[16+]
@yuki8563_playcard
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
776subscribers
+5 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003343318440 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @yuki8563_playcard |
| Created | Between 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/yuki8563_playcard |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:06 | 776 | +8 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:00 | 768 | -3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:16 | 771 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:06 | 771 | first reading |
Engagement
12 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 22.2%
- avg views ÷ 776 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 173
- 11 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 6.52%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 12
- of 12 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 9 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 12 (5 August 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,899 |
| Reactions total | 112 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 20:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
112 reactions across 9 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 83.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 93 | 83.0% | |
| 🔥 | 11 | 9.82% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 1.79% | |
| 🐳 | 2 | 1.79% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 1.79% | |
| 🍓 | 1 | 0.893% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.893% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 112reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
我想了一個這樣的設定: 魔法撲克牌是受詛咒的魔法道具,克隆人們如果有意識的想要模仿他們的主人,他們可以獲得更多主人的記憶。 但他們複製的完成度愈高,主人的生命力或是物質形態就會被稀釋掉。 簡單來說: 世界上只能有一個Fedor,而如果有一個克隆人與他愈相似,甚至足以取代他,那麼Fedor就會消失或是陷入沉睡。 這就是為什麼克隆人會有複數個體,為的就是延長這個過程。(克隆人也是彼此競爭的魔法生物)
👑 ВСЕГО НЕДЕЛЯ ДО НОВОГО СЕЗОНА «13 КАРТ»! Показываем кадры из первой серии! 😆 Следи за Okko в Telegram
❤7🔥1
☂️☀️👓 Зонтик + Феликс + Куромаку 這是我委託的羊毛氈別針,今天終於收到了!我好開心嘻嘻嘻嘻🥰🌟🌟🌟 🎨作者是 Facebook上的 ToLu #Felix #Kuromaku #Brolly #yuki8563_art
❤13👍1
вам принёс
❤9❤🔥2🔥1
我把😷emoji移除了,因為我已經超過1週沒有腰痛,超過5天沒有耳朵痛了。
❤1👍1
Channel name was changed to «yuki8563 PlayCard🃏👑[16+]»
Photo, posted without a caption
❤17🐳2
今天公司要進行考評了,但我這幾個月都在睡過頭、11:30才進公司。 我隔壁的同事下週離職,他們可能會希望我把步調調快一點吧,呵呵⋯⋯祝我好運💪😅⋯⋯
❤2
Впервые делаю эти ваши Тик-Ток тренды🥴 Ссылка #ЗемляКоролей #13Карт #Курон
❤10🔥2
☀️x👓 ( Office AU ) Феликс x Куромаку [RUS + ENG] 一直努力想要讓自己看起來是個可靠的大人的Felix,終於慢慢明白,做自己也是很棒的一件事。🤩 (好想戳他的額頭) #Felix #Kuromaku #Kurofel #yuki8563_art
❤20🔥6🍓1🥰1
謝謝購物網站的演算法帶我找到看起來很好吃的零食
❤14🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @yuki8563_playcard. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 112,704 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“yuki8563 PlayCard🃏👑[16+]” (@yuki8563_playcard), 776 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yuki8563_playcard.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.