Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Yukesha`s bizarre adventure

Channel

Yukesha`s bizarre adventure

@yukesha_desu

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

123subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001496615795
TypeChannel
Username@yukesha_desu
DescriptionПропаганда утаите фандома и концепции крепкой дружбы 🍎 I believe in Araki supremacy 🍎  Сказать админу ты дебил --> @yukesha Щитпост --> @tonarinoyukesha Заказы --> @yukesha_pricelist Извиняюсь только за донат в фанклуб Араки-сана 笑ってくれよ!
CreatedBetween 1 June 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/yukesha_desu

Growth

1238 Aug 2026, 06:00 — 123 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 03:03 — 123 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 06:009 Aug 2026, 03:03
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 122–124 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 03:03123no change
8 Aug 2026, 06:00123first reading

Engagement

8 posts held, back to 24 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
88.4%
avg views ÷ 123 subscribers
Avg views / post
109
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
22.4%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 8 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held8 (24 July 20268 August 2026)
Views total870
Reactions total195
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 03:03 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
2,040
Videos
13
Links
36

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

195 reactions across 8 posts, in 26 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 8.72% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 5463193886501399152178.72%
168.21%
💋136.67%
custom 5426874736808313006126.15%
🆒126.15%
custom 5199437380758547240115.64%
custom 5244870902025312054115.64%
custom 5787473645450301195115.64%
custom 526285894661547940094.62%
custom 520404021131032370884.10%
custom 541378402867742528084.10%
custom 524453444287727784573.59%
custom 524694933118912480273.59%
custom 530992337863365294373.59%
🤩73.59%
custom 521798105667785671063.08%
custom 536155316331899942863.08%
custom 520616181348539800652.56%
custom 520879796133247011752.56%
custom 496544971425107263042.05%
6 further kinds136.67%

Custom emoji. 16 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 195reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 13:15 UTC21 views17 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

08.08.21 16:16 проклятая дата и время потому что именно с того момента я официальный хейтер Кляйна........

custom 53615531633189994286custom 54631938865013991526🤯2custom 526285894661547940021

6 Aug 2026, 14:30 UTC33 views24 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Сюда подошла бы гудбай ремембер от Араки но я всё ещё отрицаю её существование

custom 578747364545030119511🆒7custom 529203871820128978731🤩1custom 54337114399802853461

30 Jul 2026, 14:44 UTC75 views22 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Слишком много контента да извините Второе гифт

custom 52040402113103237088custom 52061618134853980065custom 52088357570446726143❤‍🔥21🍓1🤩1🆒1

29 Jul 2026, 19:44 UTC279 views26 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

А хотя пофиг сёдня запощу Коммиш @sofuchhh

custom 54137840286774252808custom 53099233786336529437custom 520879796133247011753🤩2🆒1

27 Jul 2026, 19:37 UTC73 views25 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Я когда-нибудь перестану за день арты спидранить или не С днём этого самого ну который 🦧

custom 519943738075854724011custom 52179810566778567106custom 496544971425107263042🤩1🆒1

25 Jul 2026, 19:28 UTC242 views31 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Наконецц могу показать майскую штуку Мы с @jellywwwjolly собрались и организовали брелочный YULCHI мерч !!!!! И Кура. Не хочу Куру отдельным постом кидать, много чести .

💋10custom 54631938865013991527custom 54268747368083130065custom 526285894661547940043🤩1🆒1

25 Jul 2026, 19:28 UTC72 views20 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @jellywwwjollyPhoto

Σ(‘◉⌓◉’)お知らせ!!! судя по всему, сегодня внезапный ДРОП, внезапный, так называемый, АНОНС итак, вашему вниманию, представляю первый, красивый, замечательный, чудесный МЕРЧ YULCHI, который мы усердно разрабатывали вместе с самой лучшей юкешей (https://t.me/yukesha_desu) ❗️❗️❗️она не только отрисовала чудесные иллюстрации, но еще и помогала нам с некоторыми рабочими моментами, без нее мы бы точно не справились💘 все ден

custom 54268747368083130067custom 54631938865013991524💋3custom 526285894661547940032❤‍🔥1

24 Jul 2026, 18:28 UTC75 views30 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

У меня снова непонимание хочу я делать маленькие скетчевбросы но ±часто или копить зараз до последнего

custom 524487090202531205411custom 52445344428772778457custom 524694933118912480273🤩1🆒1

Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @yukesha_desu. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 54,927 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Yukesha`s bizarre adventure” (@yukesha_desu), 123 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yukesha_desu.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.