Channel
@yugitow
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
474subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001718015302 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @yugitow |
| Created | 3 August 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/yugitow |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:20 | 474 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:16 | 473 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:06 | 473 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 12 (6 August 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,268 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 20:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
юнхо и вчера нарисовал свою половину сердечка, а когда их взгляды с минги встретились, сделал невозмутимое лицо и отвернулся (потому что он не может выдержать взгляд минги дольше секунды), но до минги немножко поздно дошло, что именно юнхо сделал и хотел сделать вместе с ним, отчего он не сдержал смех прямо во время своей партии, и это очень улыбнуло юнхо 😭 они такие влюблёныши 🥰
и то, что они разделяют это мгновение на двоих во время строчек минги “я надеюсь, что все те моменты, о которых я мечтал, засияют” делает это ещё более значимым и драгоценным о, милый минги, знал бы ты, как вы с юнхо сияете рядом друг с другом 😭
то, как юнхо в кадре держит пудони, словно это его с минги ребёночек 😭
у меня нет абсолютно никаких слов для этого
юнхо, чем ты успел обидеть свою принцессу, что она даже смотреть на тебя не желает 😭
а это вообще законно??? 🤍🤍🤍
как же он влюблён, как же он потерян в своём человеке 🫣
сначала юнхо как обычно положил ладонь на плечико минги, а потом не сдержался и появился прямо перед его глазами и начал ладошкой махать перед его лицом, но минги тут же отвернулся, и даже когда юнхо за щёчки его поддержал не захотел встречаться с ним взглядами.. что за кошка успела пробежать между вами?? 😭
моська юнхо и то, как погас в его взгляде свет, когда после сердечка минги не повернулся к нему, чтобы встретиться взглядами 😭
посмотрим на это ещё ближе 🥺
они.нарисовали.сердечко.в воздухе.🤍🤍🤍
однажды юнхо сказал минги «давай запомним эти моменты, когда мы были счастливы» и то, как и юнхо, и минги стараются сделать как можно больше счастливых моментов вместе друг с другом, чтобы в будущем они могли с теплом вспоминать их юность делает из меня такую лужу 😭
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @yugitow. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 134,426 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“цыплёнок для щеночка | ʏᴜɴɢɪ ♡” (@yugitow), 474 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yugitow.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.