Channel
@yuemeier520
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
5subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004301570560 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @yuemeier520 |
| Created | 16 July 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/yuemeier520 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 03:48 | 5 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 17:45 | 5 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 16 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 7 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 9 (16 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,759 |
| Reactions total | 11 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 03:48 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
11 reactions across 3 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 5 | 45.5% | |
| ❤ | 3 | 27.3% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 27.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
【时间】：2026-08-10 【老师】：蜜儿 【留名】：匿名 【人照】：8 【颜值】：8 【身材】：8 【服务】：10 【态度】：10 【环境】：9 【综合】：8.83 【过程】：今天刚巧在群里发现新老师，一看位置离的好近，所以高低的试下深浅。见面老师说刚下海之前没做过一脸的紧张，耳根都发红了。然后开始洗澡老师生疏的摸沐浴露，还问我想要怎么洗，我说平常怎么洗就怎么洗。老师说平常没给人洗过，一下给我整不会了。服务环节就更有意思了，老师说我让我教她怎么做。我心想这不挖到宝了，我不喜欢做B面我就让老师做A面。一直做A面，老师口了一会，一模下面全湿的那种，摸的老师痒了还一直求我插，我傲娇的说先给口爽才做，口不爽不做，老师有忍者痒口了半天，别的不说老师的鲍鱼真好好，还特别紧，自己做上位都能给自己坐高潮。老师敏感，感觉像张白纸，虽然会的少，但是都愿意去学去做。其他同学可不要给人带偏了啊，这么实在的老师不可多得。
开课了！
❤1👍1🔥1
【时间】：2026-08-12 【老师】：蜜儿 【留名】：匿名 【人照】：8 【颜值】：8 【身材】：8 【服务】：10 【态度】：10 【环境】：9 【综合】：8.5 【过程】：今天刚巧在群里发现新老师，看着还可以，直接出发，服务车，老师刚干，水多水多水多，写的服务都有，整体服务挺好的，四川妹子，值得体验。
❤1👍1🔥1
Photo, posted without a caption
Channel photo updated
开课了！头课可约！
哥哥们快来啊！
👍3❤1🔥1
花名：蜜儿 ❤️年龄25，身高162 ，体重45kg，胸B ❤️服务：陪洗 水中萧 AB面调情 舔咪咪蛋蛋 柔式 🐻推 臀推 指滑 过水 拔罐 漫游 吸皮 冰🔥 🈚套口 鼻吸 反叼 69，360度吹箫，激情啪啪，高跟👠丝袜诱惑 情趣👙制服，姿势配合，态度好。 💰95/4（40分钟） 💰5P（45分钟） 10PP（90分钟）3️⃣通另+3张 💰精油开背+淋巴排毒+🐉筋保养92+98/9（90分钟） 💰夜20（0点-7点，限3次） 安全起见请用现金哦，照片本人，自作自聊，温柔待客，情绪拉满。 🈲无套🈲醉酒🈲嗑药 🈲三通🈲暴力 频道: @yuemeier520 双向: @yuemeierbot 约课: @yuemeier998
Channel created
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @yuemeier520. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 613,897 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“蜜儿的花园” (@yuemeier520), 5 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yuemeier520.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.