Channel
@yudaisch
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
309subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002921943351 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @yudaisch |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/yudaisch |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 13:03 | 309 | +1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 19:47 | 308 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 11 (7 August 2026 – 9 August 2026) |
| Views total | 983 |
| Reactions total | 388 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 19:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
388 reactions across 10 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5303371990139176524 | 161 | 41.5% | |
| custom 5215649576630913175 | 102 | 26.3% | |
| custom 5447106240385661933 | 92 | 23.7% | |
| custom 5194983860449866772 | 33 | 8.51% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 388reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🤩 мальчики tws пришли порадовать вас своим новым летним синглом ! присоединяйтесь к нам и наслаждайтесь им вместе с админкам 🤩 🤩---------------------------------🤩 🤩tws 🍶shinyu 🍶dohoon 🍶youngjae 🍶jihoon 🍶hanjin 🍶kyungmin 🍶jihoon & doohon 🍶shinyu & doohon 🤩seventeen 🍶the8 🍶woozi 🍶seungkwan 🍶jeonghan & joshua 🍶jun & the8 🤩&team 🍶&team ot9 🍶ej 🍶fuma 🍶yudai 🍶nicholas 🍶yuma 🍶harua 🍶t…
🤩 bad челлендж от юдая??? нам нужна полная версия 😊
custom 530337199013917652410custom 54471062403856619335custom 52156495766309131754custom 51949838604498667722
🤎
custom 530337199013917652418custom 521564957663091317512custom 544710624038566193311custom 51949838604498667723
гоблин руа pose 😭
custom 530337199013917652419custom 521564957663091317510custom 544710624038566193310custom 51949838604498667723
( 🤩 ) mark on me ✦ trailer shoot behind photo
custom 530337199013917652418custom 521564957663091317510custom 54471062403856619338custom 51949838604498667722
🤩 🤍 for deling august 2026 cover
custom 530337199013917652419custom 52156495766309131758custom 54471062403856619335custom 51949838604498667724
` 🤩 реву, кей расхваливал кэйто, и тот ответил keito : ты хочешь встречаться?? услышав твои слова, мне захотелось улыбаться k : прости, прости, я не имел в виду ничего такого. ты просто настолько оживил атмосферу, что я думаю, мы стали единым целом благодаря тебе… *тык в щечку* nagireo shippers, are u here 🤔
custom 530337199013917652419custom 521564957663091317510custom 54471062403856619337custom 51949838604498667722
КАКОЙ ЖЕ ОН КРАСИВЫЙ 🤩
custom 530337199013917652414custom 52156495766309131757custom 54471062403856619337custom 51949838604498667725
( 🤩 ) 🤍ark on me ✦ trailer photo
custom 521564957663091317520custom 530337199013917652411custom 54471062403856619338custom 51949838604498667725
он выглядит как принц сегодня, безумно красивый 😭 мое сердце не выдерживает
custom 544710624038566193321custom 530337199013917652411custom 521564957663091317510custom 51949838604498667725
🤩 twitter update 𝜗ৎ 08.07 — доброе утро ~ это сейширо наги. блю лок выходит сегодня. я буду ждать вас всех в кинотеатре ~ рееееоо, где ты?
custom 530337199013917652422custom 521564957663091317511custom 544710624038566193310custom 51949838604498667722
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @yudaisch. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,024,464 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 14 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“le charme de Yudai ♡” (@yudaisch), 309 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yudaisch.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.