Мой 2016й • переезд из офиса в Отрадном на Белорусскую • победа в хакатоне от Сбера • сокращение Маркетинг отдела • начало работы в UX команде
❤7👍3💘2

Channel
@yuandyudesign
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
49subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001703446472 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @yuandyudesign |
| Description | Юлия Конова. Рассказываю про UX/UI Дизайн, редизайн сложных продуктов, UI visual upgrade, дизайн консультации. Ex-Senior Visual Designer в SmartBear, IngramMicro Cloud, Parallels. ЛС: @yuandyu Статьи: https://teletype.in/@yuandyudesign |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/yuandyudesign |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 12:16 | 49 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:14 | 49 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 22 October 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
83 reactions across 8 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 25 | 30.1% | |
| 🔥 | 20 | 24.1% | |
| 👍 | 17 | 20.5% | |
| 😁 | 7 | 8.43% | |
| ✍ | 2 | 2.41% | |
| 🌚 | 2 | 2.41% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 2.41% | |
| 💘 | 2 | 2.41% | |
| 😢 | 2 | 2.41% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 1.20% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 1.20% | |
| 💅 | 1 | 1.20% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 1.20% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 83reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 22 October 2024 to 2 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @yuandyudesign. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 8 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 October 2024 to 2 February 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Мой 2016й • переезд из офиса в Отрадном на Белорусскую • победа в хакатоне от Сбера • сокращение Маркетинг отдела • начало работы в UX команде
❤7👍3💘2
Пересматривала свое портфолио в поисках примеров B2E И обнаружила пример из далекого 2015го: простая табличка вместо дерева (которое еще нужно развернуть)
👍5✍2
Телеграм зарелизили мою фичу! Добавление доп юзеров в звонок, что важно и для бизнеса и для обычных пользователей. И хоть я была первой, кто указал на эту функцию (спасибо Леше за идею), TG реализовали добавление людей еще круче: (см криншот) + сделали возможность добавить участника по ссылке на звонок. Ура, теперь такая функция доступна🥳! Win! Почему это важно? Потому что раньше добавить еще людей к звонку было не…
❤14🔥7👍4💅1
Настроение: придраться к чему-нибудь
😁7💯1🔥1
В то время пока остальные банки выкатывают приложения в обертке «надоя молока», просто «онлайн» и «можно все», рокетбанк идет дальше и релизит приложулю, где тон оф войс с тобой на ты, ол капс и стилек из криптобирж.
⚡1👀1
Необычный кейс в дизайн коммюнити: конкурс на новый логотип Фаберже ✦ 4 апреля 2024 Музей Фаберже объявил открытый творческий конкурс на создание нового логотипа. С 2012 года музей использует логотип, разработанный компанией Asgard Branding. В данный момент этот же логотип используется на сайте ✦ В июне Музей Фаберже подвёл итоги конкурса. Из 670 работ выбран знак студентки 1 курса кафедры графического дизайна СПбГ…
🔥5👍4👏2
О моем любимом проекте: дизайн для телеграм бота Капуста трекер (курс по управлению расходами)💸 Сделано: дизайн сайта проекта, все коммуникации для чат-бота. Небольшой глоток свободы и возможность попробовать себя в других ролях помимо UX/UI продуктового дизайнера. Любая обратная связь - буду признательна, пишите! ✦ сайт капуста-трекер ✦ TG бот можно попробовать тут: Капуста бот ✦ TG канал Считай Капусту, где Леша …
🔥7❤4
Как UX дизайн влияет на экономику: Аренда жилья в Москве. Сервис циан со своей оценкой буквально: «псс парень, не хочешь поднять цену?»
🌚2😢2👍1
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @yuandyudesign. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Юлия Конова | Дизайн” (@yuandyudesign), 49 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yuandyudesign.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.