Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ناپیدا

Channel

ناپیدا

@ypezeshkian

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

10,356subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001046811187
TypeChannel
Username@ypezeshkian
Descriptionیادداشت‌هایی درباره دین، سیاست، ادبیات، هنر و دانشگاه یوسف پزشکیان
CreatedBetween 1 January 2016 and 31 October 2016— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ypezeshkian

Growth

10,28710,35610,321.56 August 2026 — 10,355 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,343 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,325 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,318 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,307 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,303 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,297 subscribers13 August 2026 — 10,287 subscribers14 August 2026 — 10,356 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 8 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,277–10,366 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 22:4710,356+69
13 Aug 2026, 13:0410,287-10
12 Aug 2026, 11:3710,297-6
11 Aug 2026, 10:0310,303-4
10 Aug 2026, 08:1010,307-11
9 Aug 2026, 10:3410,318-7
8 Aug 2026, 13:3710,325-18
7 Aug 2026, 09:5410,343-12
6 Aug 2026, 21:0310,355first reading

Engagement

30 posts held, back to 11 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
44.9%
avg views ÷ 10,356 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,650
26 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.41%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
26
of 30 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held30 (11 July 202614 August 2026)
Views total120,990
Reactions total2,910
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 18:53 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
545
Videos
96
Links
416

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
31m 15s
Average length
15m 38s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

3,620 reactions across 30 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,68446.5%
👍1,09930.4%
👎60716.8%
😁1754.83%
🤔541.49%
🔥10.028%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 30 of the 30 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,620reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 30 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

14 Aug 2026, 08:37 UTC≈2,230 views221 reactionsread 15 August 2026

در جنگ همه از نیروهای مسلح دفاع کردن، نتیجه‌اش را هم دیدیم. اما حالا عده‌ای شمشیرهاشونو تیز کردن که دولت یه اقدامی بکنه و حمله کنن. فرقی هم نمی‌کنه دولت چه کار کنه؛ برای هر سناریویی خودشونو آماده کردن. کسی که در راه منیت خودش شمشیر میزنه، در واقع سرباز شیطانه. @ypezeshkian

115👍60👎37🤔9

12 Aug 2026, 16:26 UTC≈2,820 views78 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

آقای #گلزاری دبیر شورای اطلاع رسانی نکات مهمی را در ۸ تیر در برنامه #شیوه درباره نقش دولت در جنگ مطرح کردند که یادآوری‌شان خالی از لطف نیست. این جنگ به مدد همکاری مثلث دفاعی ما که شامل ۱- مردم، ۲- نیروهای نظامی و ۳- دولت می‌شود، پیش رفت. دولت علاوه بر پشتیبانی تمام عیار نیروهای مسلح، خودش درگیر چند جنگ بزرگ بود که دست کمی از جنگ نظامی نداشت: ۱- جنگ لجستیک و زیرساخت پل، جاده. راه آهن، فرودگاه‌ها و ... دشمن تلاش کرد

53👎12👍6😁6🤔1

12 Aug 2026, 10:13 UTC≈2,690 views74 reactionsread 15 August 2026

خاطر خیّاطِ عقل، گرچه بسی بخیه زد هیچ قبایی ندوخت، لایق بالای عشق گر ز خود و هر دو کَون، پاک تبرّا کنی راست بوَد آن زمان، از تو تولّای عشق ور سر مویی ز تو، با تو بماند به هم خام بوَد از تو خام، پختن سودای عشق #شعر عطار

56👍8👎5😁5

10 Aug 2026, 20:07 UTC≈3,690 views56 reactionsread 15 August 2026

سلام دوستان آقای دکتر #پازوکی شروع کرده‌اند، گزارش بعضی #جلسات را می‌نویسند. امیدوارم خسته نشوند و ادامه بدهند. دوست داشتید دنبال کنید. https://t.me/GovBehind/7

36👍13😁3👎2🤔2

9 Aug 2026, 13:23 UTC≈4,070 views71 reactionsread 15 August 2026

جنگ، انتقام و جهاد قسمت دهم و پایانی- قدرت اطلاعاتی و امنیتی یوسف پزشکیان این جنگ نشان داد ما ضعف امنیتی و اطلاعاتی داریم. ثابت کرد که نفوذ را باید جدی بگیریم و لازم است بازآرایی امنیتی در دستور کار قرار گیرد. بحث‌های بسیار متنوعی را می‌شود در این حوزه مطرح کرد که من فقط می‌خواهم توجه خوانندگان را به این سوال جلب کنم که: نفوذ را باید در کجا جستجو کنیم و چگونه باید شناسایی کنیم؟ به باور من اگر روی ۳ تا هدف فوق (مولف

48👍10👎7😁6

9 Aug 2026, 09:27 UTC≈3,210 views55 reactionsread 15 August 2026

جنگ، انتقام و جهاد قسمت نهم - قدرت اجتماعی یوسف پزشکیان قدرت اجتماعی و رسانه‌‌ای یعنی توان همراه کردن افکار عمومی و مردم با خود یعنی توان ایجاد اجماع جهانی بر علیه اسرائیل در افکار عمومی. برای رسیدن به این هدف چند تا کار لازم است همزمان انجام شود. 1️⃣ اول افزایش و تثبیت انسجام داخلی. باید مشارکت کنندگان درانتخابات در کشور از ۵۰٪ به ۸۰٪ برسد. باید میزان رضایت مردم از حکومت افزایش پیدا کند. راه‌های رسیدن به این اهد

35👎12👍7😁1

7 Aug 2026, 17:18 UTC≈2,930 views121 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

گزارش به مردم قسمت سوم- مشارکت داخلی، سیاست خارجی رئیس جمهور امشب و در آخرین قسمت گزارش به مردم در خصوص تفاهم نامه، رابطه با نیروهای مسلح و. رهبری و شایعه استعفا صحبت کرده است. این گفتگو بعد از خبر ساعت ۲۱ پخش می شود رسانه رسمی دکتر مسعود پزشکیان 🪩 www.pezeshkian.ir 🎙 @drpezeshkian

77👎32👍9😁2🤔1

7 Aug 2026, 10:49 UTC≈3,700 views82 reactionsread 15 August 2026

توی مسیر این صوت را گوش دادم. مطالبی که بازنشر می‌کنم معنایش این نیست که ۱۰۰٪ با محتوا موافقم. حتما قابل نقد است. گاهی شیوه بیان نامناسب، محتوا و منظور گوینده را تحت تاثیر قرار می‌دهد و به حاشیه می‌برد. به عنوان مثال در این صحبت عنوانی که انتخاب شده، باعث موضع‌گیری می‌شود و در نتیجه ممکن است استدلال‌ها و محتوا شنیده نشود. اگر هدف از طرح موضوعی ایجاد تغییر و اصلاح است، باید مراقبت کنیم که با ایجاد دوقطبی و احساسی

👍4916👎11😁4🤔2

7 Aug 2026, 10:25 UTC≈3,490 views85 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @NagidNagoftimVoice message

مجلس چگونه نظام حکمرانی را هک کرده؟ از نظام انتخاباتی محلی که نماینده را به کارچاق‌کن حوزه انتخابیه تبدیل می‌کند تا فقدان تحزب و استیضاح فقط با ۱۰ امضا که اصلی‌ترین اهرم دولت یعنی انتصابات را تصاحب میکند و بودجه دولت را به بده‌بستان رانتی و شخصی بدل کرده... مقایسه با مجالس موفق دنیا و ریشه‌های واقعی ناکارآمدی. تحلیل کامل را در این ویس گوش کنید. احمدجانجان 📆سه‌شنبه ۱۴۰۵/۰۲/۱۵

👍55👎1411😁3🤔2

6 Aug 2026, 21:17 UTC≈4,590 views165 reactionsread 15 August 2026

سلام دوستان چند روز تبریز بودم و جلسات متعددی را با همکاران دانشگاهی و دوستان رسانه‌ای شرکت کردم. گزارش یکی از جلسات را خبرنگار خبرگزاری فارس منتشر کرده [اینجا]. تصاویری هم از جلسات بیرون آمده. تمام گفتگوها دوستانه و غیررسمی بوده. سعی کردم بخشی از اطلاعاتی را که دارم به اشتراک بگذارم و منطق بعضی تصمیمات را به قدر فهم خودم توضیح بدهم‌. در تمام جلسات به صحبت‌ها و نظرات حضار گوش دادم. نکات مهم و خوبی هم یاد گرفتم.

101👍35👎24😁4🤔1

5 Aug 2026, 02:58 UTC≈4,550 views93 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @shafaqna_farsi

«بنی امیه، حکمرانی از موضع خدایی»/ استاد سروش محلاتی: ⬅️ در اندیشه بنی امیه «اطاعت از حاکم» مرزی نمی‌شناسد ⬅️در دوره ای «اطاعت از حاکم» بر «حق، عدالت و کرامت انسان» مقدم شمرده شد ⬅️ عده ای پیرو مکتب علوی هستند، اما رفتاری اموی دارند ⬅️مراقب باشیم از مسیر منحرف بنی امیه دور بمانیم ⬅️آیت الله محمد سروش محلاتی در سخنرانی که به مناسبت اربعین حسینی با عنوان «بنی امیه، حکمرانی از موضع خدایی» داشت، تأکید کرد: ⬅️ در ا

👍66👎159🤔2😁1

5 Aug 2026, 02:55 UTC≈3,380 views76 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @entekhab_irPhoto

♦️ شیخ نعیم قاسم: 🔹 آنچه تجاوز اسرائیل با آن سطح از وحشی‌گری را کاهش داد، یادداشت تفاهم میان آمریکا و ایران بود 🔹 تهران در رویارویی با واشنگتن به پیروزی رسیده 🔹 ایران کشوری مهم است که حضور آن در سراسر جهان تأثیر می‌گذارد جزئیات در👇👇 https://www.entekhab.ir/003urX 🆔 @Entekhab_ir

38👍20👎8😁6🤔4

Showing the 12 most recent of 30 posts we hold for @ypezeshkian. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@ypezeshkian edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
9 August 2026
Most recent edit
9 August 2026

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 73,402 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ناپیدا” (@ypezeshkian), 10,356 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ypezeshkian.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.