Вы знали что свадебный танец мы с вами будем все таки танцевать под нейрошансон
custom 53867464321600350864custom 57963516263189752073custom 57964665381689795352custom 54696918413077579621custom 57964853673056046801

Channel
@youznali
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
184subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001745230721 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @youznali |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/youznali |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 22:45 | 184 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 05:46 | 184 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (30 July 2026 – 9 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,362 |
| Reactions total | 182 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 05:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
182 reactions across 20 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5467832232137741705 | 38 | 20.9% | |
| custom 5208662450819321241 | 19 | 10.4% | |
| custom 5416033075417084454 | 15 | 8.24% | |
| custom 5796351626318975207 | 15 | 8.24% | |
| custom 5796485367305604680 | 13 | 7.14% | |
| custom 5380082455392845502 | 12 | 6.59% | |
| custom 5796466538168979535 | 12 | 6.59% | |
| custom 5366389751760851269 | 11 | 6.04% | |
| custom 5467810048631658566 | 9 | 4.95% | |
| custom 5467875177515734283 | 8 | 4.40% | |
| custom 5287353063500185120 | 7 | 3.85% | |
| custom 5389097458603149989 | 7 | 3.85% | |
| custom 5267117965035212004 | 4 | 2.20% | |
| custom 5386746432160035086 | 4 | 2.20% | |
| custom 5199626750161598990 | 2 | 1.10% | |
| custom 5233468957855341870 | 2 | 1.10% | |
| custom 5469691841307757962 | 2 | 1.10% | |
| custom 5362096403667519164 | 1 | 0.549% | |
| custom 5386735016136949805 | 1 | 0.549% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 182reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @youznali. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 July 2026 to 9 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Вы знали что свадебный танец мы с вами будем все таки танцевать под нейрошансон
custom 53867464321600350864custom 57963516263189752073custom 57964665381689795352custom 54696918413077579621custom 57964853673056046801
Вы знали что реальным ковбоям и байкерам не нужны дверные ручки и колесики на чемоданах. Зачем.
custom 57963516263189752073custom 57964665381689795353custom 57964853673056046802
Вы знали что если ваша кошка родила котят, то вы можете немного помочь ей и последить за ними, чтобы она могла отдохнуть, сходить в лоток, поухаживать за собой, поесть, прогуляться, покурить и вернуться.
custom 54160330754170844547custom 57964853673056046802custom 57963516263189752071
Вы знали что единственный серьезный показатель поведенческих изменений — это изменение поведения?
custom 54160330754170844545custom 57963516263189752072custom 57964853673056046801
Вы знали на кухне есть несколько горячих кругов, один холодный прямоугольник и один горячий прямоугольник. Возможны вариации.
custom 57964665381689795356custom 54696918413077579621custom 57964853673056046801
Вы знали что наша группа друзей может и небольшая но мы все с серьезными отклонениями
custom 57964853673056046804custom 57963516263189752073custom 51996267501615989901custom 54160330754170844541custom 57964665381689795351
Вы знали что рукописи Пушкина стоит добывать голыми руками, бережно, в залежах чернозема на глубине примерно 2 или 3
custom 52873530635001851206custom 54160330754170844542
Вы знали что слово вешний является обязательным в старых стихотворениях. во всех.
custom 53890974586031499895custom 57963516263189752072custom 51996267501615989901custom 57964853673056046801
Вы знали что как было слово «вешний» в учебнике по русскому языку так и осталось, ничегошеньки к вам в голову не перешло.
custom 54678751775157342838
Вы знали что МЫ НАХОДИМСЯ НА ЮРИДИЧЕСКОЙ ТЕРРИТОРИИ ЛАЙК НА МОЕ СООБЩЕНИЕ ЭТО НОТАРИАЛЬНО ЗАВЕРЕННАЯ ПОДПИСЬ
custom 52086624508193212413custom 54678100486316585663custom 53890974586031499892custom 52334689578553418701custom 52873530635001851201custom 53620964036675191641custom 53867350161369498051custom 54678322321377417051
Вы знали что знание - сила, а сила в правде, следовательно всё что вы знаете - правда, и вы абсолютно сильны и абсолютно всезнающие?
custom 54678322321377417055
Вы знали что прицел на долголетие и справедливую мстительность😨 нам настроили ещё виагра песней биология в далёком 2003 году? Сходите и переслушайте кто забыла👿
custom 52086624508193212414custom 53663897517608512694
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @youznali. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 885,831 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Вы знали” (@youznali), 184 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/youznali.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.