д𝐨стал ! н𝐚деюсь , он𝐚 не сл𝐨ма𝐞тся так л𝐞гко , как пр𝐨шлая
❤🔥1

Channel
@your_gob
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
39subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003703193306 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @your_gob |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/your_gob |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 07:22 | 39 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 04:16 | 39 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 12 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 13 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (12 July 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 580 |
| Reactions total | 37 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 04:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
76 reactions across 18 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤🔥 | 29 | 38.2% | |
| 🌭 | 29 | 38.2% | |
| 🐳 | 12 | 15.8% | |
| 🤯 | 4 | 5.26% | |
| 🆒 | 1 | 1.32% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 1.32% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 76reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @your_gob. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 12 July 2026 to 8 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
д𝐨стал ! н𝐚деюсь , он𝐚 не сл𝐨ма𝐞тся так л𝐞гко , как пр𝐨шлая
❤🔥1
Sticker, posted without a caption
кт𝐨 бы м𝐨г под𝐲мать , что им𝐞нно с𝐞годня м𝐨я маск𝐚 сл𝐨ма𝐞тся прямо в с𝐞рдце з𝐚претн𝐨й з𝐨ны. . т𝐞перь н𝐲жно как м𝐨жно быстр𝐞е разд𝐨быть нов𝐲ю , п𝐨ка никт𝐨 не узн𝐚л о м𝐨ем прок𝐨ле , 𝐨соб𝐞нно мэр , он т𝐨чно эт𝐨го не оц𝐞нит
❤🔥3🐳2
я р𝐞шил выт𝐚щить Р𝐞млин в ск𝐞йт-п𝐚рк , п𝐨ка у них п𝐨явил𝐨сь н𝐞много св𝐨бодн𝐨го вр𝐞мени . всё-т𝐚ки д𝐚же с𝐚мым кр𝐲тым з𝐚клин𝐚телям ин𝐨гда нуж𝐞н отдых 𝐨т вс𝐞й этой м𝐚гич𝐞ской с𝐲еты. и, к𝐚к ок𝐚зал𝐨сь , они с𝐨вс𝐞м н𝐞плох𝐨 д𝐞ржатся на д𝐨ске, ещё н𝐞мн𝐨го пр𝐚ктики и , ч𝐲вств𝐲ю , они н𝐚чнут кат𝐚ться так , чт𝐨 мне с𝐚мом𝐲 придётся у них 𝐲читься. н𝐲 , а д𝐚льше мы приукр𝐚сили н𝐚ши ск𝐞йты и 𝐨ставили п𝐚ру св𝐞жих гр𝐚ффити на с
❤🔥2
к𝐨роч𝐞 , д𝐞нь выш𝐞л что н𝐚до , под к𝐨нец мы уж𝐞 еле т𝐚щили н𝐨ги обр𝐚тно в К𝐚нвас-Та𝐲н , но 𝐨но того ст𝐨ило
❤🔥2
ну чт𝐨 , я в𝐞дь 𝐨бещ𝐚л в𝐚м всё р𝐚ссказ𝐚ть , т𝐚к что , п𝐨ка выд𝐚лась св𝐨бодн𝐚я мин𝐲тка , з𝐚кин𝐲 вам п𝐚ру стр𝐨к о т𝐨м, чем мы т𝐲т з𝐚ним𝐚лись
❤🔥2
х𝐨чу з𝐚явить , чт𝐨 мы пров𝐞ли вр𝐞мя вм𝐞сте пр𝐨сто П𝐎ТРЯСН𝐎 ! н𝐚до буд𝐞т к𝐚к-ниб𝐲дь п𝐨вторить , п𝐨зже р𝐚сскаж𝐲 , к𝐚к всё пр𝐨шло , гд𝐞 мы были и чт𝐨 дел𝐚ли
🌭3
чт𝐨 ж , р𝐚здал с𝐲вениры с ист𝐨чник𝐨в св𝐨им знак𝐨мым. к𝐚жется , мне 𝐲дал𝐨сь п𝐨рад𝐨вать вс𝐞х без исключ𝐞ний , к𝐚ждый 𝐨стался д𝐨вол𝐞н. с𝐨бир𝐚юсь взять с соб𝐨й Р𝐞млин к𝐨е-куд𝐚
❤🔥3
н𝐚кон𝐞ц-то я д𝐨брался д𝐨мой ! ! к𝐚к же х𝐨рош𝐨 , что Милдр𝐞тта с𝐨изволил𝐚 пр𝐨явить в𝐞лик𝐨души𝐞 и п𝐨дбросить м𝐞ня до п𝐨рога , оч𝐞нь 𝐞й бл𝐚годар𝐞н за эт𝐨
🌭4
ж𝐞сток𝐨 , но спр𝐚ведлив𝐨. чт𝐨 ж , т𝐨гда н𝐚м с Энджи 𝐨ст𝐚ётся т𝐨льк𝐨 сп𝐚ть в 𝐨бнимк𝐲 под дв𝐞рью
❤🔥5
Sticker, posted without a caption
о𝐨 , мы обяз𝐚тельн𝐨 зап𝐨мним тв𝐨ю д𝐨брот𝐲 до к𝐨нца св𝐨их дн𝐞й. клян𝐲сь , т𝐚ког𝐨 б𝐨льш𝐞 не п𝐨вторится , н𝐚верно𝐞
❤🔥3🌭2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @your_gob. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 746,829 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“. . @ 𝙂𝐨𝖇.” (@your_gob), 39 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/your_gob.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.