кстати, все идеи брала с анона)

Channel
yourannad
@yourAnnad
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
385subscribers
+5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002873627744 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @yourAnnad |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/yourAnnad |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:27 | 385 | +5 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:16 | 380 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:23 | 380 | first reading |
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 21.0%
- avg views ÷ 385 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 81.0
- 19 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 12.9%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 19
- of 19 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (5 August 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,539 |
| Reactions total | 78 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 06:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 50s
- Average length
- 50s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
78 reactions across 8 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5467453295763162742 | 29 | 37.2% | |
| custom 5253485738837700284 | 19 | 24.4% | |
| custom 5228827356633799368 | 17 | 21.8% | |
| custom 5253508768452343088 | 13 | 16.7% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 78reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
репост, кто любит полю 🤍
репост, кто любит катю 🫶
накиньте реак на бота, который больше зашел)
«странные шутки» вы познакомились, попав в одну компанию два года назад. пока все там были в отношениях, вы - два свободных человека. у двоих отношения были давно, около трех лет назад. все ребята именно по этой причине шутили над вами, пытались свести и сделать вас парой под предлогом: "это судьба". и было не зря. спустя год таких стараний, вы действительно поняли, что неравнодушны друг к другу. тогда вы и пришли к …
custom 54674532957631627428custom 52534857388377002844custom 52535087684523430884
«новый босс» ты работаешь в компании бренда одежды главным дизайнером уже лет пять. за это время ты стала лидером в команде, достигла хороших отношений с боссом. и все было хорошо, работа шла в гору, пока не случилось то, чего все так боялись... ваш босс уволился. у него были какие-то личные причины и все понимали, что это его выбор, но было безумно грустно. Виктор Владимирович был безумно добрым и понимающим челове…
custom 54674532957631627426custom 52288273566337993683custom 52535087684523430882
«вот это сюрприз» твоя жизнь очень много лет абсолютно неинтересна. никакой романтики, никаких путешествий и развлечений. только работа и редкие вечерние посиделки с подругой за душевными разговорами и бокалами красного вина. именно поэтому около недели назад ты решила попробовать исправить ситуацию. зарегистрировалась на сайте знакомств, оставила анкету и принялась искать. хороших парней там было много, но лайкала …
custom 54674532957631627427custom 52534857388377002844custom 52535087684523430883
«устал от скандалов» тебе никогда не рассказывали, что случилось на самом деле. каждый раз ты слышала одни и те же фразы: "вырастешь - расскажем", "ничего серьезного", "тебе это знать необязательно". но как можно скрывать от ребенка пропажу его собственной матери? может, она ушла из семьи к другому мужчине. может, она пропала без вести. может, однажды она серьезно заболела. ты не знала, что из этих теорий - правда. н…
custom 52534857388377002846custom 52535087684523430884custom 54674532957631627423
через пару минуток в постах ниже отправлю текст каждого бота ❤️
custom 52288273566337993683custom 52534857388377002842custom 54674532957631627421
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 🔠🔠🔠 🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 @yourannad 🤟🤟🤟 1. устал от скандалов 🤍🤍🤍 2. вот это сюрприз.. 🤍🤍🤍 3. новый босс 🤍🤍🤍 4. странные шутки все боты только в c.ai переходите по ссылкам и развивайте свои истории) за дальнейшее ваше общение с ботами я, как автор, не отвечаю. моя зона ответственности лишь приветствие (первое сообщение самого бота)!
custom 52288273566337993687custom 52534857388377002843custom 54674532957631627423
сегодня дроп? ммм...
custom 52288273566337993684
напоминаю!!!! ❤️
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @yourAnnad. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“yourannad” (@yourAnnad), 385 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yourAnnad.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.