Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Сеть студий красоты Youna Уфа: маникюр, педикюр и брови

Channel

Сеть студий красоты Youna Уфа: маникюр, педикюр и брови

@youna_ufa

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

417subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 13 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001278789850
TypeChannel
Username@youna_ufa
CreatedBetween 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded13 September 2026
Last confirmed live27 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 27 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/youna_ufa

Topic

Ecommerce storefront — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 27 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 61% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

41341741513 September 2026 — 414 subscribers13 September 2026 — 414 subscribers14 September 2026 — 413 subscribers27 September 2026 — 417 subscribers13 September 202627 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 14 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 412–418 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Sept 2026, 20:20417+4
14 Sept 2026, 08:56413-1
13 Sept 2026, 13:22414no change
13 Sept 2026, 12:47414first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 20 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
13.1%
avg views ÷ 417 subscribers
Avg views / post
54.5
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.42%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 12 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 September 2026
Posts held12 (20 May 2026 – 12 September 2026)
Views total109
Reactions total7
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Sept 2026, 13:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 43s
Average length
26s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

91 reactions across 12 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤5964.8%
🔥1516.5%
🥰99.89%
❤‍🔥44.40%
👍22.20%
💯11.10%
😍11.10%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 91 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 20 May 2026 to 12 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Sept 2026, 10:22 UTC55 views5 reactionsread 13 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤2💯1🔥1🥰1

12 Sept 2026, 10:22 UTC54 views2 reactionsread 13 September 2026

Юля заказала нам осенние новинки! Цветаааааа🍁🫛🍀

❤2

29 Aug 2026, 10:27 UTC185 views6 reactionsread 13 September 2026
Video

Дааамыыы😍 Мы обновляемся для ваших осенних маникюров! Говорят, это денежный цвет сентября🍇🍆💜

❤5😍1

5 Aug 2026, 10:19 UTC270 views5 reactionsread 13 September 2026
Photo

Что-то мы здесь все о полезном и важном. Развлекалочку вот вам принесла ♥️ Даже если отпуск нами еще не запланировался, ну помечтать и наманифестировать-то можно! Куда полетим?🛫

❤5

27 Jul 2026, 07:51 UTC246 views2 reactionsread 13 September 2026
Photo

Сразу покажем поближе "до-после" Техника очень бережная, совмещаем ее с укрепляющим лаком или японским маникюром и наслаждаемся натуральной ногтевой пластиной без нарастающей и ползущей кутикулы. Выполняют пока не все мастера студии, но мы работаем над этим. На Ленина вы можете записаться к Николине и Маше. На Чернышевского к Оле и Анастасии С. Работа на фото вип-мастера Николины.

👍2

27 Jul 2026, 07:47 UTC192 views3 reactionsread 13 September 2026
Video

Дамы! Мы наконец-то запустили пилочный маникюр. Пилочный маникюр - это: ✨нежная обработка кожи без использования режущих инструментов и аппарата ✨использование индивидуальных одноразовых пилок ✨пролонгированный эффект, с каждым разом кожа становится менее грубой

❤3

7 Jul 2026, 10:50 UTC258 views21 reactionsread 13 September 2026
Photo

Ждала фотки с Премии 2Гис, чтобы под красивым кадром сказать Вам спасибо! Спасибо наши чудесные гости, что оставляете отзывы нам на картах. Это очень важно и очень нужно, да и приятно сильно😊 Лично читаю все отзывы, вижу всё что вы пишете. Благодарю за все все все приятные слова!

❤16🔥5

20 Jun 2026, 11:26 UTC296 views8 reactionsread 13 September 2026
Photo

Ну посмотрите какие зефирки💅🏻

🥰8

20 Jun 2026, 11:25 UTC267 views3 reactionsread 13 September 2026
Photo

Дорогие! К нам пришли новенькие и очень красивые топы😍 Ниже прикреплю фото этих топов на ручках с дизайном-втиркой.

🔥3

3 Jun 2026, 11:19 UTC308 views21 reactionsread 13 September 2026
Photo

Уииии….студию на Чернышевского номинировали на премию 2ГИС 2026! Благодарим за отзывы, которые Вы оставляете нам на картах. Это всегда было важно, но сейчас стало так нужно как никогда🤍

❤12🔥6❤‍🔥3

1 Jun 2026, 07:08 UTC297 views5 reactionsread 13 September 2026
Video

101 РОЗА ДЛЯ ТЕБЯ! 🌹 El Epil и Youna запускают совместный июньский челлендж красоты с невероятным призом от студии Elliflo Как стать участницей? 1️⃣ Посетите клинику El Epil (на услуги и товары от 2000р) — получите отметку в карточке клиента. 2️⃣ Посетите студию красоты Youna (на услуги от 2000р) — получите вторую отметку. Всё! Две отметки = автоматическое попадание в список участников розыгрыша. Что вас ждет? Ш…

❤5

20 May 2026, 15:25 UTC297 views10 reactionsread 13 September 2026
Video

Посмотрите какая красота к нам пришла! Парфюмированные гели от Sens🔥 Gucci Rush Juliette Has A Gun Escada Moon Sparkle Black Love Republic Baccarat Rouge 540 Armani Code Amber Romance · Victoria's Secret Ange ou Demon · Givenchy Cherry Love Lost Cherry · Tom Ford Есть твой любимчик?

❤9❤‍🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @youna_ufa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Сеть студий красоты Youna Уфа: маникюр, педикюр и брови” (@youna_ufa), 417 subscribers as measured 27 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/youna_ufa.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.