Channel
@you_can_call_me_pasha
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
62subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002453467712 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @you_can_call_me_pasha |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/you_can_call_me_pasha |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Sept 2026, 12:17 | 62 | +1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 04:45 | 61 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:39 | 61 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 15 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
85 reactions across 14 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 53 | 62.4% | |
| 👍 | 9 | 10.6% | |
| 🔥 | 6 | 7.06% | |
| ❤ | 4 | 4.71% | |
| 😱 | 4 | 4.71% | |
| 🫡 | 4 | 4.71% | |
| 😎 | 3 | 3.53% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 2.35% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 85 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 15 June 2026 to 26 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Для себя вопрос гладить или не гладить футболки я решил однозначно, осознав, что утюг для неуверенных в себе людей. Сегодня вспомнил об этом снова и вдруг подумал, что в принципе одежда для неуверенных в себе людей. Думаю, как в понедельник идти на работу? Коллеги, увидимся!
😁10❤1👍1
В связи с вот-этим-вот-всем-происходящим совершенно всерьез и абсолютно без шуток задумываюсь о том, чтобы свой уже далеко не свежий iPhone обновить на android. Это адекватное решение или я крейзи? Какую модель посоветуете?
👍3😱2
Моя любимая фича в любом мессенджере — возможность планировать отправку отложенных сообщений. Поэтому, если вас бесит, что я не отвечаю, просто потерпите, ответ уже запланирован. Ну или я просто вас игнорирую, как в тот раз.
😁2😱2
Posted without readable text
😁5👍2
Posted without readable text
🎬 Новый фильм Кристофера Нолана «Одиссея» едва вышел в прокат, а концовку уже слили в интернет. Понятное дело, там спойлеры — смотрите на свой страх и риск.
🫡3😁3
Posted without readable text
В прошедшее воскресенье на Кузнецком мосту: — Алло, у моего дома ваш трактор! — Передайте ему, что я на обеде! #10k_steps
😁2🔥1
Video message, posted without a caption
🔥5👍1
Только что понял, что Tiffany была первой бирюзовой компанией до всех этих ваших Точек, Майндбоксов и ВкусВиллов
😁3❤🔥2🫡1
В выходные слонялся по Китай-городу. В одном из переулков наткнулся на группу молодых людей, которые выглядели максимально стереотипно, будто деды с "Первого канала" задумали пародию на зумеров, а потом эта пародия ожила. Пока шел рядом, прислушался, о чем говорят: — В общем, там главный AI-агент по сути оркестратор, он создает под запланированные задачи sub-агентов и делегирует выполнение им, забирает от них резул…
😁6
У VK хорошая самоирония 🙃
😁9
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @you_can_call_me_pasha. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Я Паша, а вы нет!” (@you_can_call_me_pasha), 62 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/you_can_call_me_pasha.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.