Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ๐™ธ๐šƒ'๐š‚ ๐šˆ๐™พ๐š„ ๐ŸคŽโ˜•

Channel

๐™ธ๐šƒ'๐š‚ ๐šˆ๐™พ๐š„ ๐ŸคŽโ˜•

@you_and_me273

On this record: Topic ยท Growth ยท Engagement ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Polls ยท Citations ยท Telegram's recommendations ยท Cite this entry

502subscribers

+10 since we began measuring on 27 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002075614684
TypeChannel
Username@you_and_me273
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 โ€” estimated from Telegramโ€™s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded27 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/you_and_me273

Topic

Religion โ€” a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelโ€™s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 83% confidence. This is a modelโ€™s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured โ€” it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

492503497.527 August 2026 โ€” 492 subscribers27 August 2026 โ€” 492 subscribers28 August 2026 โ€” 495 subscribers6 September 2026 โ€” 503 subscribers13 September 2026 โ€” 502 subscribers50227 August 202613 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 17 days, net +10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โ€œno change observedโ€, never โ€œinterpolatedโ€. The vertical axis spans 490โ€“505 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Sept 2026, 23:18502-1
6 Sept 2026, 05:55503+8
28 Aug 2026, 10:42495+3
27 Aug 2026, 13:15492no change
27 Aug 2026, 13:01492first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 8 August 2026 โ€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโ€™s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegramโ€™s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR ยท 30 days
8.37%
avg views รท 502 subscribers
Avg views / post
42.0
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
13.1%
reactions รท views ยท ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท views โ€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโ€™s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 26 August 2026
Posts held20 (8 August 2026 โ€“ 26 August 2026)
Views total84
Reactions total11
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface โ€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken27 Aug 2026, 13:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โ€œcorrectingโ€ the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ€” 8.12K, 3.7M โ€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

107 reactions across 18 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
โค3532.7%
๐Ÿ’˜2119.6%
๐Ÿ“1413.1%
๐Ÿ•Š1312.1%
๐Ÿ’ฏ87.48%
โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ54.67%
๐ŸŒš54.67%
๐Ÿฅฐ43.74%
๐Ÿ”ฅ10.935%
๐Ÿ˜10.935%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ€” ๐Ÿ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ€” 4.34K, 1.2M โ€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโ€™s own count on each post โ€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ€” those same posts carry 107 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โ€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ€.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 August 2026 to 26 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

26 Aug 2026, 01:38 UTC36 views7 reactionsread 27 August 2026

_ู‚ูŠู„ ู„ุนู„ูŠู‘ ุจู† ุฃุจูŠ ุทุงู„ุจ (ูƒุฑู… ุงู„ู„ู‡ ูˆุฌู‡ู‡) : ู…ุง ุจูŽุงู„ู ุงู„ุนูู‚ู„ุงุก ููู‚ุฑุงุกุŸ ูู‚ุงู„ : ุฅู† ุนู‚ู„ ุงู„ู…ุฑุก ู…ุญุณูˆุจูŒ ุนู„ูŠู‡ ู…ู† ุงู„ุฑุฒู‚.๐Ÿค

โค5๐Ÿฅฐ2

Signed ๐Œ๐š๐ซ๐ข๐š๐ฆ๐Ÿ”ฎ

25 Aug 2026, 13:21 UTC48 views4 reactionsread 27 August 2026

ูุงู„ุฃุฏุจ ู„ูŠุณ ู…ุฑุงุฏูู‹ุง ู„ุงุญุชุฑุงู… ุงู„ุดุฎุต ุงู„ุขุฎุฑุŒ ุจู„ ู‡ูˆ ุงุญุชุฑุงู…ูŒ ู„ู†ูุณูŠ ุฃูˆู„ู‹ุงุŒ ูˆุงุฎุชูŠุงุฑูŒ ู„ู…ุณุงุฑ ูŠู„ูŠู‚ ุจูŠ. ุงู„ุฃุฏุจ ู„ุง ูŠุนู†ูŠ ุงู„ู…ุจุงู„ุบุฉ ููŠ ุงู„ู„ุทูุŒ ูˆู„ุง ุงู„ุฎุถูˆุน ู„ู„ู…ุดุงุนุฑุŒ ูˆู„ุง ุฅุธู‡ุงุฑ ู…ุง ู„ุง ุฃุดุนุฑ ุจู‡. ู‡ูˆ ุบู„ุงููŒ ู…ู† ุงู„ุงู†ุถุจุงุท ุงู„ุฐุงุชูŠุŒ ู„ุง ูŠุทูุฆ ุงู„ุบุถุจุŒ ูˆู„ุง ูŠู…ุญูˆ ุงู„ูƒุฑุงู‡ูŠุฉุŒ ูˆู„ุง ูŠู„ุบูŠ ุงู„ุงุฎุชู„ุงูุŒ ูˆู„ุง ูŠู…ู†ุญ ุงู„ูˆุฏ ููŠ ุบูŠุฑ ู…ูˆุถุนู‡. ูˆุฅู† ุฃุฌุจุฑู†ูŠ ู…ู† ุฃู…ุงู…ูŠ ุนู„ู‰ ุชุฌุงูˆุฒ ุญุฏูˆุฏ ุงู„ุฃุฏุจุŒ ุณุฑุช ู…ุนู‡ ุฅู„ู‰ ุญูŠุซ ูŠุฑูŠุฏุŒ ู„ูƒู† ูˆูู‚ู‹ุง ู„ู…ุง ุฃุฑูŠุฏ ุฃู†ุง. " ุงู„ุฃุฏุจ ุงุฎุชูŠุงุฑ ู„ุง ุถุนู "

๐Ÿ•Š3โค1

Signed ๐•„๐”ธโ„๐•Ž๐”ธ ๐”ธ๐•ƒ ๐”ธ๐•ƒ๐•€โœจ๐Ÿชฝ

20 Aug 2026, 20:23 UTC80 views5 reactionsread 27 August 2026

ุชุทูˆู ุญูˆู„ู‡ุง ุจุฑุงุกุฉ ุฃุจุฏูŠุฉ , ู„ู† ุชุชุดูˆู‡ ุงุจุฏุงู‹..๐Ÿ’•

๐Ÿ“3โค1๐Ÿฅฐ1

18 Aug 2026, 17:37 UTC102 viewsread 27 August 2026
Poll

_ู‡ู„ ุงู„ุฎุณุงุฑุฉ ุจุนุฏ ุงู„ุฌู‡ุฏ , ูุดู„..ุŸ

  1. ู†ุนู…24%
  2. ู„ุง76%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

17 Aug 2026, 22:03 UTC108 views9 reactionsread 27 August 2026

ุฃุญูŠุงู†ุงู‹ ุงู„ุฃุจุชู„ุงุก ู†ุนู…ู‡ . ู„ุฃู† .. ูŠุชุนู„ู‘ู… ุงู„ุฅู†ุณุงู†ู ููŠ ุณุงุนุงุชู ุงู„ุจู„ุงุกู ู…ูŽุงู„ุง ูŠุชุนู„ู‘ู…ูู‡ู ููŠ ุณู†ูŠู†ู ุงู„ุนุงููŠุฉู..

๐Ÿ•Š5๐Ÿ’ฏ3๐Ÿ’˜1

17 Aug 2026, 10:44 UTC117 views8 reactionsread 27 August 2026

ู„ู… ู†ุนุฏ ุฃุทูุงู„ุงู‹ ุงู„ุขู† ุงู…ูŠ ุชุญูƒูŠ ู„ูŠ ู‡ู…ูˆู…ู‡ุง ูˆุงู†ุง ุงุฎููŠ ู‡ู…ูˆู…ูŠ ุนู†ู‡ุง ุญุชู‰ ู„ุง ุงู‚ู„ู‚ู‡ุง

โค7๐Ÿ’˜1

16 Aug 2026, 15:54 UTC115 views5 reactionsread 27 August 2026

ู„ู…ุง ู†ู…ุฑู‚ู‡ุง ุจุฏูˆู† ุฑุฏ ูุนู„ ุงุนุฑููˆ ุงู†ูˆ ู…ุฑู‚ู†ุงูƒู… ู…ุนู‡ุงโœจ

๐Ÿ’ฏ5

15 Aug 2026, 13:55 UTC140 views6 reactionsread 27 August 2026

_ุงู„ู…ุดู‡ุฏ ุงู„ุฃุฎูŠุฑ -ุงู„ู„ูŠุงู„ูŠ ุงู„ุจูŠุถุงุก_ โ€ุจู‚ูŠุชู ุทูˆูŠู„ุงู‹ ู‡ูู†ู€ุงูƒ , ุฃูุชู€ุงุจูุนู‡ู…ู€ุง ุจู†ู€ุธุฑุงุชูŠ.. ูˆ ุฃุฎูŠุฑุงู‹ ุบู€ุงุจุง ู…ุนุงู‹ ุนู† ุจู€ุตุฑูŠ. ุชูู€ุฑู‰ ูƒูŠููŽ ูŠุดุนูุฑ ุงู„ุฅู†ุณุงู† ุจู€ู…ู† ุชุนู€ู„ู‘ูŽู‚ูŽ ู‚ู„ุจู‡ู ุจุฅู†ุณุงู†.. ุซู… ุฃุฏุฑูƒูŽ ุงู†ู‘ู‡ู ู„ู€ู… ูŠุนุฏ ู„ู€ู‡ู , ูˆ ู„ู„ุฃูŽุจุฏุŸ.โ€๐Ÿ–ค

โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ4โค1๐Ÿ•Š1

14 Aug 2026, 19:26 UTC136 views5 reactionsread 27 August 2026
Forwarded from @layal_Cute

ูŠุดุจู‡ ุชู„ูƒูŽ ุงู„ู„ู‘ุญุธุฉ.. ุนู†ุฏู…ุง ูŠูƒูˆู† ุงู„ู…ุฑุก ุชุงุฆู‡ุงู‹ ูˆูŠุธู‡ุฑ ุฃู…ุงู…ู‡ ุดุงุฑุนูŒ ู…ุฃู„ูˆู๐Ÿ’™.

โค3๐Ÿ“1๐Ÿ”ฅ1

Signed ๐•„๐”ธโ„๐•Ž๐”ธ ๐”ธ๐•ƒ ๐”ธ๐•ƒ๐•€โœจ๐Ÿชฝ

12 Aug 2026, 06:03 UTC156 views5 reactionsread 27 August 2026

ุชู…๐ŸŒ

โค4๐Ÿฅฐ1

Signed ู„ูŽูŠุงู„ .

12 Aug 2026, 05:56 UTC156 views6 reactionsread 27 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

๐Ÿ’˜4โค1โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ1

Signed ๐•„๐”ธโ„๐•Ž๐”ธ ๐”ธ๐•ƒ ๐”ธ๐•ƒ๐•€โœจ๐Ÿชฝ

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @you_and_me273. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A pollโ€™s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

18 Aug 2026, 17:37 UTCAnonymous Poll17 voters

_ู‡ู„ ุงู„ุฎุณุงุฑุฉ ุจุนุฏ ุงู„ุฌู‡ุฏ , ูุดู„..ุŸ

  1. ู†ุนู…24%
  2. ู„ุง76%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only โ€” there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each optionโ€™s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each optionโ€™s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 August 2026 to 26 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind โ€” an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results โ€” and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegramโ€™s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly โ€” each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseโ€™s query is independent of having been queried itself.

For You
@fy1_foryou ยท 26,242
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 73 here โ€” alongside 72 others โ€” read 12 September 2026
It's Ok
@its_Ok77_SY ยท 32,504
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 73 here โ€” alongside 72 others โ€” read 4 September 2026
ุฃุญู…ุฏ ุงู„ุตุงุจูˆู†ูŠ
@ahmadalsabouni ยท 45,390
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 69 here โ€” alongside 68 others โ€” read 27 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegramโ€™s list for THAT channel, not this one โ€” see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 โ€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

โ€œ๐™ธ๐šƒ'๐š‚ ๐šˆ๐™พ๐š„ ๐ŸคŽโ˜•โ€ (@you_and_me273), 502 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/you_and_me273.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.