Channel
@yongjmian
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
120subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002376240223 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @yongjmian |
| Description | Crypto职业投资人、脚本小子、Meme玩家。 自诩为傻。独立观点，不受任何交易所、项目方的利益影响。 |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/yongjmian |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 04:02 | 120 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:04 | 120 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 25 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 17 (25 March 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 7 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 04:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
3 reactions across 3 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 25 March 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
来自速搜推荐 @SSOU 📢眾量級CROWD 📢东南亚大事件/缅北吃瓜/... 📢欧博官网 亚星官网 欧博... 📢菠菜灰U洗币刷流水 📢东南亚顶级博彩平台、电子... 📢影视剪辑|无缝衔接|治愈... 📢欧博私网 欧博假网 亚星... 📢李宗恒|自娱自乐 📢HomeMoviesTu... 📢刀枪剑戟|冷兵器|分享 📢快手 抖音 网红 📢未来电影 独一无二 深耕... 📢雪兰莪安邦修车 雪兰莪安... 📢高潮脸-阿黑颜🔞 📢桂花|翠芬|招娣丨性感内... 👉流量互推规则介绍💥 以下是广告推荐 📢✅金边娱乐城✅全网上押800万u盘总聚集地 📢💹567U时代火爆上线！招收玩家/代理，匿名开户，放心娱乐！ 📢 飞驰号铺 [主营：飞机号 开会员 代充星星] 📢🔰开元官方🔥代理70%|电子棋牌|AG百家乐 📢182体育 2026世界杯指定投注平台、 免实名、不限ip、u存u提无上限 🇨🇳 简体中文包 —————————-- 🔥将 …
来自速搜推荐 @SSOU 📢黑丝AV中出无码日本AV 📢零点历史Zero 📢Bubble Chann... 📢钢管舞|比基尼|暴露|吸... 📢淫妻绿帽🔞 📢趴赛上门 帕塞上门 📢新盛赌场线上直播平台 📢永利国际，云顶国际，银河... 📢法国赌场--新盛赌场 📢欧博代理 亚星代理 亚星... 📢李志Lizhi 📢以色列-巴勒斯坦🔥新盛... 📢心河摆渡 📢鹰眼科普 📢百家乐包赢技巧-欧博 亚... 👉流量互推规则介绍💥 以下是广告推荐 📢182体育 2026世界杯指定投注平台、 免实名、不限ip、u存u提无上限 📢⚽️爱博体育-佣金55%-玩家首存即升VIP7等级⚽️ 📢 TeleTop 中文索引 📢💎 【8.cc】U投领导者 千万域名 百亿大盘 充值笔笔加赠3% 📢💎85.CC电子百家乐0审核包出款支持汇旺提U 🇨🇳 简体中文包 —————————-- 🔥将 @TonGroupHelpBot 设置为频道管理员，即可在2
《从Gate上币策略中看财富效应》 傻哥近期交易bsc的meme，发现Gate都在第一时间上了老子、踏马、人生K线等龙头 甚至老子的筹码一度20%多在Gate交易， 社区戏称Gate截胡了bsc。 傻哥就对Gate的上币策略好奇了 恰好今天看到了《Gate 2025 现货上币报告》， 有种豁然开朗的感觉。 1、首发财富效应强10倍 从数据上看，首发和非首发的财富效应，竟然差距10倍的。 在24小时窗口内，首发项目的中位数涨幅（12.56%）是 非首发项目（1.18%）的10倍以上。 非首发项目，就像“二手资产”，缺乏超额收益。 首发+独家，是双重buff， 有超过 1/3 的独家项目在 30 分钟内实现 ≥100% 涨幅 那对于兄弟们而言，一定要优选首发项目，最好首发+独家双重buff，胜率更高。尽量避免二手资产。 2、财富效应集中在极早期 这点和大家的实战感受颇为类似，新币收益与时间的负相关关系。 也就是说，新币财富…
❤1
币安钱包（网页版）整合了Aster的永续合约了 在币安钱包中，在币安钱包（网页版）中，不用三方授权， 提供类Cex的合约体验 整个过程中，用户都不用私钥管理，对私钥也是无感知的。 这下，链上和CEX的次元壁被打破了 目前还有活动，有20万Usdt奖励池的合约交易活动 合约高手过来耍吧
再一次血的教训： BSC上买币，只买体制内的 体制外的杂牌币，靠不住
《过去24h BSC一级市场扫描》 过去24h，其实bsc一级没啥财富效应 你说龙头吧，早上买入龙头，拿到晚上，不赚钱 你说P吧，畜生盘太多 这是外部流动性更差 只有少数单点标的有自营强庄 野庄的道德品质，随时流动性变差而越发恶劣了 分水岭就是昨天下午一姐那几个盘子 币安不处理，看着散户被野庄割，然后炫耀 昨晚上有点枯燥啊 链上没啥新东西，连镰刀都不活跃了 今天就是人造牛尴尬的地方 所有人都指望着币安的定向流动性投放 一旦这个预期打破，社区就会作鸟兽散 都在赌币安兑现隐形承诺 一姐刻意少说话 说明准备的子弹和流动性，拆分不动了 不出预料，这次比10月份弱的多
今天才有时间，把lighter把产品看了下，官方文档和研报读了读 之前上线，这个工作一直没时间做 今天发现lighter的产品有意思的地方 发现通过0 fee吸引散户，让散户把专业用户慢200-300ms 之前我也没撸这个项目 这种打法我之前没留意到 其实这是让庄家更好地收割散户而散户不自知 打法鸡贼啊 至少在短期内，把散户的量推上去了 另外一个数据是 30号空投的时候，volume是4b 现在是5.8b 空投后volume并没有下来，可能是大家想撸第二季了 也说明，交易量还是真实存在些的 另外从手续费看，hyperliquid 是750m一年 lighter是90m一年 市值上两者大概也是这个比例。 但hyperliquid是龙头，理应有溢价 对比看吧，hyperliquid的真实交易量，都在下跌 lighter的交易量其实还要再看下，这几天的数据还不能充分说明其增长 hyperliquid的volume是低于open…
《加密两个半》 目前加密市场需要关注的核心矛盾就两个半 1、 btc 2、稳定币 3、半个：layer1+赌场类应用+新赌场筹码 第三个为啥是半个 因为没有项目，只有筹码和盘子 除此三者外，都是浪费时间 其中3呢 就是我之前说的 庄家+交易所+kol+老韭菜等9个人，守株待兔蹲1个傻钱进来 什么叫做傻钱 就是看了几篇科普文，两眼发光 觉得x402能在币圈落地的，觉得Ai+crypto能有一番作为的 啥叫做老韭菜，就是观察傻钱数量进出的 就是傻钱来的时候，喊得比傻钱更大声 一旦傻钱流动性不够了，立马下车的 只有btc和稳定币是正和游戏 3是分食傻钱的游戏，一旦傻钱不够，就会镰刀互割，是负和的游戏 负和游戏，尽可能在傻钱数量不够的时候远离
❤1
《顶级投资老狐狸》 乔布斯说：stay hungry 巴菲特&大道：保持平常心 这两者是矛盾的 就是说创业者要保持饥渴、保持高欲望 投资人要保持平静、超越fomo和fud 一个投资人说我要保持饥渴，是怪异的 动不动就出手，会被割的体无完肤 一个创业者说我有颗平常心，不争不抢的，也是怪异的 缺乏狼性和执行力 傻哥觉得，终究巴菲特&大道的境界更高 因为乔布斯死的太早了，寿命甚至远不及普通人 打法上太过消耗自己 那些顶级的投资上的老狐狸 为了不消耗自己 甚至让自己一辈子的严肃投资不超过20个 Peter 林奇，投了太多头发累白了 在他们眼中都是反面教材 都是不太入流的、不值当的打法
United Stables这个得看下 U的核心技术是EIP-3009 (Gasless Signatures) 通的 ERC-20 代币转账必须由发起人支付gas 但 $U 在代码层面植入了 EIP-3009 标准，可以第三方补贴gas U不仅是稳定币 还相当于在所有稳定币上面包了一层 类似币安之前的busd， 稳定币和法币都可以0摩擦兑换U 这个是赌未来稳定币是分散的小颗粒度终局 在那个终局中，U就会非常牛逼 火币第一个支持U， 并且补贴给了20%年化收益； 并且早期币安补贴gas，免费转账 这个打法是农村包围城市 国人小伙伴一看就懂 基本判断是 币安和孙哥，联手对抗circle
《不值得出手的百倍币》 眼睁睁看着一个币涨了2倍、5倍、10倍、20倍、100倍 但处在其中每一个时间节点 依旧没看懂，咩有看到未来价格会大涨的依据，或者模糊的凸性机会 没有看懂谁在买，后续的流动性接盘人是谁 没看懂外部流动性的持续性 那么这种情况不出手就是对的； 理性的做法是保持平静、心静如水，而不是fomo; 更重要的是减少出手，参不透原因的暴涨太多了，太频繁了 处在高度信息不对称劣势下的暴涨也太多了，太频繁了 不构成凸性投资机会的暴涨也太多了，太频繁了 换句话说，单纯的价格暴涨和单纯的价格暴跌，都无法构成投资出手的条件 单纯依赖价格暴涨或者依赖价格暴跌下注，应该也是长期必亏的。 投资大师如何面对暴涨的妖股呢？ 价值投资派：巴菲特 & 芒格 (The "Ignore" Camp) 态度： 无视、甚至蔑视。将其视为“击鼓传花”的赌博，而非投资 能力圈原则： 如果我不理解它为什么涨（看不懂现金流、护城河），哪怕它涨到天上…
❤1
《这轮熊市的底部是多少？》 早上军师问：你们感觉这轮熊底多少 傻哥随口回答： 这时候非常好的问题 我相信你也看到了很多人的预测 我在22年的投资笔记中写道： 事后看，熊市之初，主流分析师都低估了熊市的跌幅。他们对熊市跌幅也缺乏想象力 我记得上轮他们一开始是说永恒牛市了，机构进场了 然后他们说eth 2500是铁底 再然后说不会跌破2000 再然后说不会跌破1400，上上轮牛顶。历史上下轮底部从未跌破上轮顶部，言之凿凿 后来跌到了1000，他们中还有些人厚着脸皮说1000是心理大底，不可能跌破 终于跌破了1000，过去半年的抄底的人全部套牢，市场上也没人出手了 跌到900了。 各大社区陷入平静 and then，这帮分析师改口说熊市不言底 这帮分析师从头到尾，没有一个人承认自己没有预测能力且是短视的 这帮叼毛，很容易把新韭菜忽悠瘸了
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @yongjmian. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 639,338 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 29 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@yongjmian named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“比特别傻” (@yongjmian), 120 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yongjmian.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.