Channel
@yizhan_gusu
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
270subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 3 October 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002057171820 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @yizhan_gusu |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 3 October 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/yizhan_gusu |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Oct 2026, 22:19 | 270 | -1 |
| 7 Oct 2026, 16:16 | 271 | +1 |
| 3 Oct 2026, 18:22 | 270 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 12 January 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (12 January 2025 – 29 September 2026) |
| Views total | 79 |
| Reactions total | 7 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Oct 2026, 18:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
304 reactions across 15 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 115 | 37.8% | |
| 😭 | 50 | 16.4% | |
| 🔥 | 39 | 12.8% | |
| ❤🔥 | 29 | 9.54% | |
| 💘 | 20 | 6.58% | |
| 👍 | 16 | 5.26% | |
| 👏 | 16 | 5.26% | |
| 🥰 | 8 | 2.63% | |
| 😍 | 5 | 1.64% | |
| 🤩 | 4 | 1.32% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 0.658% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 304 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 12 January 2025 to 29 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
سلام بچه ها میخوایم پنجشنبه به مناسبت تولد جان با ادمینا و بعضی بچه های چنل @Theuntamedtweet یه پیکنیک دسته جمعی پارک بانوان تهران بریم اگر کسی هست که میخواد بیاد به ایدیم پیام بده هزینه ای نداره و رایگانم هست @fatemehyzwx
❤7
یکی از بچه ها فرکانس شبکه رو فرستاد انتیمد ساعت هشت شب
❤9🤩1🥰1
بچه ها پرشیانا چین انتیمد میده
😭17❤6👍2
Posted without readable text
بچه ها یکی از ادمینای قدیمی چنلمون که نویسنده ییجانی هم هست چنل برای ییجان زده دوست داشتین جوین بشین 🪻 https://t.me/yoonmin_yizhan
😁2❤1🥰1
فقط خواستم بگم جان ما هیچکدوم نفهمیدیم این آدم برفی کیه خیالت راحت باشه 🤣 لبخند کج ادم برفی عین پوزخندای ییبوعه 🫠 و جان اینو میدونه چون وقتی بهش گفتن ییبو چطور ژست میگیره اینکارو کرد 🥹 میدونم همتون باهاش عر زدین ولی من دوباره خواستم باهاش عر بزنم یه سوالم داشتم...به نظرتون بهترین کندی ییجان سال 2025 چی بود؟ ─── ʙᴊʏxꜱᴢᴅ ─── ╰┈➤|@yizhan_gusu| ─── ʙᴊʏxꜱᴢᴅ ───
😭19❤🔥4❤2
Signed Hasti 💗
سلام همگی من اینروزا خیلی به حمایت نیاز دارم متوجهم اگه نخواید خرید کنین ازم ولی لطفا تو چنل آنلاین شاپم جوین بشین 🫠 https://t.me/cocoaestyle
❤9❤🔥1
Signed Hasti 💗
بیاین یه کندی خوب بهتون بدم 😝 میدونین که ییجان هردو تو یه شهرن 🏙 امروز قرار بوده جان ساعت 10:30 بره سرکار ولی برنامش عوض شده و ساعت 12:30 از هتل بیرون اومده میگن ییجان باهم غذا خوردن بعدم ییبو ساعت 1:23 رفته سرکارش دیگه باهم تو یه شهرن و به قول خود جان باتریش +100 عه 🤤 #باهم_یه_جا #کندی #ییجان ─── ʙᴊʏxꜱᴢᴅ ─── ╰┈➤|@yizhan_gusu| ─── ʙᴊʏxꜱᴢᴅ ───
🔥17❤4😍4👍2❤🔥1😭1
Signed Hasti 💗
نگاهم فقط روی دست ییبوعه 🫶🥹 جوری که جانو نگاه میکنه رو ببین ☁️ #پشت_صحنه #ییجان ─── ʙᴊʏxꜱᴢᴅ ─── ╰┈➤|@yizhan_gusu| ─── ʙᴊʏxꜱᴢᴅ ───
👍12😭7❤4🔥1
Signed Hasti 💗
یوبین یا همون ژنرال ارواح این ویچتشو با ییبو پست کرده 😆 تولد ییبو رو بهش تبریک گفته یوبین:تولدت مبارک!!!زمان خیلی زود میگذره تو یه چشم به همزدن سی سالت میشه ییبو:ممنونم ❤️ هاهاها عکس پروفایل ییبو هم اون ماشینه هست که احتمالا با هوش مصنوعی درست شده 🥹 چه کیوت اونایی که میگن ییبو دیگه با تیم انتیمد هیچ ارتباطی نداره بدجور ازین کار یوبین سوختن 😂 #با_کست_انتیمد #ییبو ─── ʙᴊʏxꜱᴢᴅ ─── ╰┈➤|@yizhan_gusu| ─── ʙᴊʏxꜱᴢᴅ ─
❤18🥰2🔥1
Signed Hasti 💗
از تولد ییبو یه کندی هست که بدونین جالبه 😉 اقای شیائوجان یا بهتره بگیم همسر اقای وانگ ییبو عکس های بالا برنامه ی تعطیل شدنش تو تمام روزهای تقومه از 7.16 تا 8.4 زودترین زمانی که تعطیل شده ساعت 7:32 بوده اما روز تولد ییبو ساعت پنج از کارش برگشت رفته با عشقش وقت بگذرونه 🪄 یه چیز دیگه هم هست که احتمالا خودتون میدونین دیگه نامه و بعضی نقاشی های تولد ییبو میگن کار جان بوده 🥺 #کندی #ییجان ─── ʙᴊʏxꜱᴢᴅ ─── ╰┈➤|@yizha…
❤🔥18❤4😍1
Signed Hasti 💗
_ییبو و جان دوست ندارن باهم شیپ بشن ! 😠 _اونا فقط همکار بودن 🥱 _دوستیشونو خراب نکنین با شیپ کردن 🙂↔️ وقتی این خانم بازیگر یا مجری یادم نیست دقیق...تو لایو جلوی ییبو شعار معروف bjyx رو گفت 👀 واکنش ییبو>>>>> 🕶 #واکنش_به_شیپرا #ییجان منبع ویدیو تیکتاک ─── ʙᴊʏxꜱᴢᴅ ─── ╰┈➤|@yizhan_gusu| ─── ʙᴊʏxꜱᴢᴅ ───
🔥19❤6👏2🥰2
Signed Hasti 💗
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @yizhan_gusu. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Yizhan gusu☁️” (@yizhan_gusu), 270 subscribers as measured 14 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yizhan_gusu.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.