Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 丸子的闺房

Channel

丸子的闺房

@yiyidexiaohuoban

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

223subscribers

+165 since we began measuring on 2 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004464942395
TypeChannel
Username@yiyidexiaohuoban
Created31 August 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded2 September 2026
Last confirmed live11 September 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/yiyidexiaohuoban

Growth

58223140.52 September 2026 — 58 subscribers3 September 2026 — 65 subscribers11 September 2026 — 223 subscribers2 September 202611 September 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net +165. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 33–248 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Sept 2026, 00:59223+158
3 Sept 2026, 01:4565+7
2 Sept 2026, 19:0058first reading

Engagement

8 posts held, back to 31 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
177.7%
avg views ÷ 223 subscribers
Avg views / post
396
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 8 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 4 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held8 (31 August 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total1,585
Reactions total0
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 19:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 17:31 UTC15 viewsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @bdbdbsbnjinn

宁波男神交流群报告榜 (活跃群友可信度较高) 【工兵报告】 『推荐指数:⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️』 【日期】:9月2日 【美女昵称】:#丸子 【验证人】:Logic 【地 区 】:鄞州 【联系方式】:@yiyi888887 【见面感觉】:娇小玲珑 【属性标签】:熟女 【技术含量】:不错 【价格 】:500p(工兵半价) 【年龄】:28左右 【身高】:40kg左右 【体重】:155左右 【凶器,是否假奶】:真 【肤色,手感】:白嫩光滑 【三点】:好看 【课表,特色】:热情,耐心 【人照相似】:9分 【服务过程】: 拿到工兵名额便急匆匆跟老师约了时间出击,得知要帮忙做四项,也是查了查怎么做。地方是酒店公寓类型的,遥控上楼后推开门,看见老师小小一个,跟照片上差别倒不是很大,身材属于娇小可爱的,相貌却是带着熟女的芬芳,也是别具几分韵味。进门寒暄两句,便开始做四项,研究了一阵,也是终于搞定了。随后老师帮忙放热水,由于浴室较小,可惜无法与老师…

2 Sept 2026, 06:54 UTC426 viewsread 2 September 2026

(非活跃群友,可信度低) 推荐指数:⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ 【日期】:9.1 【美女昵称】:#丸子 【验证人】:舟游 【地 区 】:鄞州 【联系方式】:@yiyi888887 【见面感觉】:有青春感的气质少妇 【室内光线】:暖柔 【属性标签】:少妇~恋爱 【技术含量】:9 【价格 】 包时600 【安 全 性】: 【年龄】:28+ 【身高】:163 【体重】:90 【凶器,是否假奶】 B-C 【人照相似,真人打几分】:10 本人果然比照片好看! 【服务过程】: 群里看到一个新老师,服务什么的都还不错就过去玩玩。 我来这么久了,都是悄悄滴进村没怎么写报告,但丸子bb真的长在我的点上了,身材和我的白月光老师非常相似,让我很是兴奋 说话也很温柔 皮肤正常白 天呐!这怎么不算一种相逢呢?就算是相似的花我也异常惊喜 因为白月光老师不在了。 开局交了水费我就抱着老师就是一个暴风吸入她的发香 体香,真的喘息呻吟了 兄弟们理解一下遇…

Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @yiyidexiaohuoban. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“丸子的闺房” (@yiyidexiaohuoban), 223 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yiyidexiaohuoban.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.