Channel
@yishuxuey
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
8,766subscribers
+442 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002322214225 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @yishuxuey |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/yishuxuey |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 21:24 | 8,766 | +156 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 12:06 | 8,610 | +127 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 17:25 | 8,483 | +150 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:52 | 8,333 | +9 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:17 | 8,324 | first reading |
129 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 129 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 129 (7 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 9,069 |
| Reactions total | 10 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 16:19 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
10 reactions across 6 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 5 | 50.0% | |
| ⚡ | 2 | 20.0% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 10.0% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 10.0% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 10.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 129 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 129 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
@#报告模板 【所属群组】东莞学生会 【所在地区】南城 【老师艺名】 糯糯 【联系方式】@nuonuo66661 【验证留名】Liz 【验证日期】8.12 【上课价位】400p 【人照几分】9 【优点缺点】：服务真的很好 【体验细节】人照一致，颜值超出预期。非常白。沙发上很自然腿就搭上来了，破冰很快。老师在沙发上脱了衣服瞬间起立，本来还想沙发上多腻歪会。实在顶不住催老师去洗澡。 浴室全自动，擦拭，递上漱口水。 回到房间开始服务，浅蛇，随后嫩妹三件套，口活很好，舔的很有力度。是我的舒适区，今天鸡儿真的是梆硬。比平时还要再粗一点。 不会写黄文，过程简述下，老师床感很骚。骚话不断，各种姿势都能配合极佳，屌感非常舒适。包裹的严丝合缝。水量适中，恰到好处的摩擦感，换了几个姿势最后女上出水。出水过程中老师配合继续抽插，直接射到腿软。 支持匿名报告，匿名需要花费200积分隐藏ID。（积分多此举是为了避免恶意刷好评或者差评，所以大家尽量…
@#报告模板 【所属群组】东莞学生会 【所在地区】东莞大朗 【老师艺名】丽丽 【联系方式】 @lili537 【验证留名】 风云 【验证日期】8月12日 【上课价位】500p 【人照几分】10 【服务过程】老师特别热情，颜值比较高，老师基本上人照无差。我愉快交了水费。老师身材好，抱着很有感觉，嗅着老师的发香和体香，一阵刺激蔓延开来。老师是言听计从，很乖巧，说话声音也很好听，从不会冷场，服务也很哇塞很刺激，超棒。全是优点没缺点。 支持匿名报告，匿名需要花费200积分隐藏ID。（积分多此举是为了避免恶意刷好评或者差评，所以大家尽量还是客观评价吧） 打分标准:6分及格，7分漂亮，8分优质，9分无脑冲 ⚠️报告提交给 投秘书长处 @guangdongrsbot） 并须附：确认可添加的联系方式聊天等截图，遥控上楼部分聊天截图、付款截图（如现金，请说明)交流主群：https://t.me/Dgx07
@#报告模板 【所属群组】东莞学生会 【所在地区】南城 【老师艺名】 啵啵 【联系方式】 @lanlan_16 【验证留名】 天啦 【验证日期】 8.12 【上课价位】500p 【人照几分】10 【服务过程】: 首次出击是啵啵，给我留下不可磨灭的印象，配合度，服务绝对没得说，鼎中鼎，态度认真不敷衍，明显是认真对待。现在上新啵啵，来初次试水，质量还是一如既往的高，没的说，啵啵老师特点舌头非常有力，口的时候深喉不断，并且一直在口腔旋转。69配合度也很高，老师还非常贴心的上了润滑，让手感更上一层楼。啪的时候选择了经典传教士，温热包裹感强，一进一出老师表情都很丰富，叫声反应都很到位，非常不错的一次出击，以后还会出击 支持匿名报告，匿名需要花费200积分隐藏 ID。（积分多此举是为了避免恶意刷好评或者差评，所以大家尽量还是客观评价吧） 打分标准:6分及格，7分漂亮，8分优质，9分无脑冲 ⚠️报告提交给 投秘书长处 @gua…
@#报告模板 【所属群组】东莞学生会 【所在地区】大朗 【老师艺名】 萱萱 【联系方式】 @xuanxuan2218 【验证留名]后不久 【验证日期】8月12日 【上课价位】500p 【人照几分】9.5 【服务过程：和萱萱约好时间，到楼下遥控上楼比较好找。老师身材属于小只瘦型，热情，态度也好 ，帮洗很仔细，老师口的非常舒服，吸的马眼爽死了，时机成熟戴套开始，重点是逼非常紧，老师腰很细，也能轻松抱起来，正面最带劲，很快就喷涌而出，身材纤细态度好值得来。 支持匿名报告，匿名需要花费200积分隐藏ID。（积分多此举是为了避免恶意刷好评或者差评，所以大家尽量还是客观评价吧） 打分标准:6分及格，7分漂亮，8分优质，9分无脑冲 ⚠️报告提交给 投秘书长处 @guangdongrsbot） 并须附：确认可添加的联系方式聊天等截图，遥控上楼部分聊天截图、付款截图（如现金，请说明)交流群：https://t.me/Dgx07
@#报告模板 【所属群组】东莞学生会 【所在地区】大朗 【老师艺名】 萱萱 【联系方式】 @xuanxuan2218 【验证留名]后不久 【验证日期】8月12日 【上课价位】500p 【人照几分】9.5 【服务过程： 支持匿名报告，匿名需要花费200积分隐藏ID。（积分多此举是为了避免恶意刷好评或者差评，所以大家尽量还是客观评价吧） 打分标准:6分及格，7分漂亮，8分优质，9分无脑冲 ⚠️报告提交给 投秘书长处 @guangdongrsbot） 并须附：确认可添加的联系方式聊天等截图，遥控上楼部分聊天截图、付款截图（如现金，请说明)交流群：https://t.me/Dgx07
@#报告模板 【所属群组】东莞学生会 【所在地区】大朗 【老师艺名】 萱萱 【联系方式】 @xuanxuan2218 【验证留名]后不久 【验证日期】8月12日 【上课价位】1000p 【人照几分】9.5 【服务过程：和萱萱约好时间，到楼下遥控上楼比较好找。老师身材属于小只瘦型，热情，态度也好 ，帮洗很仔细，老师口的非常舒服，吸的马眼爽死了，时机成熟戴套开始，重点是逼非常紧，老师腰很细，也能轻松抱起来，正面最带劲，很快就喷涌而出，身材纤细态度好值得来。 支持匿名报告，匿名需要花费200积分隐藏ID。（积分多此举是为了避免恶意刷好评或者差评，所以大家尽量还是客观评价吧） 打分标准:6分及格，7分漂亮，8分优质，9分无脑冲 ⚠️报告提交给 投秘书长处 @guangdongrsbot） 并须附：确认可添加的联系方式聊天等截图，遥控上楼部分聊天截图、付款截图（如现金，请说明)交流群：https://t.me/Dgx07
@#报告模板 【所属群组】东莞学生会 【所在地区】南城 【老师艺名】圆圆 【联系方式】 @Yuanyuan_92 【验证留名】混乱 【验证日期】8.12 【上课价位】700p 【人照几分】9.5 【服务过程】见到妹妹那一刻，就觉得是我要的感觉，身材非常哇塞，来了聊了会天，然后一起洗澡，然后帮我擦身上的水，然后让我躺床上，做服务，真的这口活真的是好，帮我口的时候，真的是太舒服了，没有半点齿感，感觉爽歪歪了！服务很专业，也很有耐心不催，做到情深之处，带上套子，就开始插，换姿势啥的，老师都非常配合，老师的身材从后面进感觉特别棒，我从来没有给谁写过出击报告，遇到圆圆老师，必须给她写份出击报告，服务好，身材棒，兄弟们，放心出击！ 支持匿名报告，匿名需要花费200积分隐藏ID。（积分多此举是为了避免恶意刷好评或者差评，所以大家尽量还是客观评价吧） 打分标准:6分及格，7分漂亮，8分优质，9分无脑冲 ⚠️报告提交给 投秘书长处 @g…
@#报告模板 【所属群组】东莞学生会 【所在地区】大朗 【老师艺名】 芝芝 【联系方式】 @zhizhi2444 【验证留名】 【验证日期】8月12日 【上课价位】400p 【人照几分】10 【服务过程】从进门开始情绪价值拉满，很注重客人感受，帮忙脱衣服，询问空调水温这些。帮洗澡的时候实在忍不住在卫生间就开始疯狂蹂躏她的咪咪，一边揉搓咪咪，一遍捏她的Pp。上床后实在受不了抱着老师的头开始抽插她的小嘴，看着她迷乱的眼神，极品翘臀和美乳简直要升天了，带上雨伞上开始猛操，第一发五分钟就射了，用传教士和观音坐莲。休息了十分钟聊天也很愉快，不知不觉鸡吧又硬了，让老师穿了黑丝，舔了几下立马来感觉，后入式一顿猛插，老师下面很紧水也多，夹的我有点疼了，还是喜欢传教士吧，插了十分钟又射了，最后一下双方抱的紧紧的，升天了，整体服务很好，没有不悦，姿势配合到位。 支持匿名报告，匿名需要花费200积分隐藏ID。（积分多此举是为了避免恶意刷好评或者差评…
【所属群组】东莞学生会 【所在地区】大朗 【老师艺名】小瑶妹 【联系方式】@ccc77887 【验证留名】俯卧撑哥 【验证日期】8.12 【上课价位】400p 【人照几分】9 【服务过程】 碰巧路过，试着问问。结果，小瑶妹刚好起晚了，居然头课😜真是有缘！ 进门看见确实是嫩妹一枚✌🏻，纤细苗条的身材，正好是我这个腰控喜欢的类型😏。妹子小腹平坦，没有赘肉，皮肤微黄，B胸真实，屁屁微圆，口活不错，毫无齿感。 正面起手，刚刚插入，发现小瑶妹逼逼超级紧致👍🏻赶紧调教她练习夹鸡🐔不夹不知道，一夹神仙笑😘太紧太爽了，而且，妹子调皮的双手轻拍着我的屁股，说弹性好好，这么可爱，我哪能放过，放出俯卧撑大招。没砸几下，妹子竟然就三四次次高潮，逼逼不停抽搐抖动，妹子呻吟求饶“受不了”😝这嘤嘤嘤，谁受得了！赶紧拉到床角，抱着筷子腿又是一顿猛操。结果，妹子的逼逼又发抖了三四次🤭本来还想抱着操的，妹子看来没力了。于是换后入，发现竟然是…
@#报告模板 【所属群组】东莞学生会 【所在地区】大朗 【老师艺名】小雪 【联系方式】 @xiaoxne18 【验证留名】jiffy 【验证日期】8.12 【上课价位】400p 【人照几分】9 【服务过程】是多情的妹子哟。约好时间就出发，妹妹这边环境还不错，妹妹颜值不错，笑起来暖暖的。有点小贤妻的味道温柔的气息，让人无法自拔。黑色蕾丝小内内，洗完让她穿上黑丝袜，身材很棒，口活做的挺好，一点齿感都没有，要什么服务要和她商量，而且会问怎么舔你比较舒服，咪咪还是粉的。让她继续口就一直口 支持匿名报告，匿名需要花费200积分隐藏ID。（积分多此举是为了避免恶意刷好评或者差评，所以大家尽量还是客观评价吧） 打分标准:6分及格，7分漂亮，8分优质，9分无脑冲 ⚠️报告提交给 投秘书长处 @guangdongrsbot） 并须附：确认可添加的联系方式聊天等截图，遥控上楼部分聊天截图、付款截图（如现金，请说明)交流主群：http…
@#报告模板 【所属群组】东莞学生会 【所在地区】南城 【老师艺名】文文 【联系方式】@wenwen508 【验证留名】辣子鸡 【验证日期】8.12 【上课价位】400 【人照几分】9.5 【服务过程】 约课出击，进门看到文文老师身材匀称160+的身高，人照相似度很高，但也能在照片上依稀看的出老师的影子，不过老师颜值也不错，胸应该有c+，大概这样子，正常黄皮，进门寒暄两句，放水洗澡，老师陪浴，还是很体贴的，擦水什么的。服务69 做 舔咪咪，舔蛋蛋这些。整体配合，比较主动。蜜桃臀，臀型不错，后入会下腰。服务好，但是整体还是比较沉浸式的体验，感觉很出戏。昆反馈很不错，各种姿势也是很配合。一次不错的出击体验。 支持匿名报告，匿名需要花费200积分隐藏ID。（积分多此举是为了避免恶意刷好评或者差评，所以大家尽量还是客观评价吧） 打分标准:6分及格，7分漂亮，8分优质，9分无脑冲 ⚠️报告提交给 投秘书长处 @guangdon…
@#报告模板 【所属群组】东莞学生会 【所在地区】东莞大朗 【老师艺名】丽丽 【联系方式】 @lili537 【验证留名】 猎人 【验证日期】8月12日 【上课价位】500p 【人照几分】10 【服务过程】老师给我服务爽呆啦、她是会所出生、服务天花板、每寸皮肤都轻轻漫游一遍！👅软绵绵、屁股沟特爽…户型好、熊是水滴胸…水多、一线天 支持匿名报告，匿名需要花费200积分隐藏ID。（积分多此举是为了避免恶意刷好评或者差评，所以大家尽量还是客观评价吧） 打分标准:6分及格，7分漂亮，8分优质，9分无脑冲 ⚠️报告提交给 投秘书长处 @guangdongrsbot） 并须附：确认可添加的联系方式聊天等截图，遥控上楼部分聊天截图、付款截图（如现金，请说明)交流主群：https://t.me/Dgx07
Showing the 12 most recent of 129 posts we hold for @yishuxuey. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 105,520 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@yishuxuey named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“(东莞)学生会报告” (@yishuxuey), 8,766 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yishuxuey.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.