Channel
@djfneir
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
9subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 9 October 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004499775533 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @djfneir |
| Description | 频道: https://t.me/djfneir 私聊: @dhfdgye 双向:@dhfdgyebot |
| Created | 9 October 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 9 October 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/djfneir |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Oct 2026, 17:22 | 9 | no change |
| 9 Oct 2026, 16:47 | 9 | first reading |
4 posts held, back to 9 October 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 4 (9 October 2026 – 9 October 2026) |
| Views total | 81 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Oct 2026, 17:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
@#报告模板 【所属群组】东莞学生会 【所在地区】大朗 【老师艺名/ #笑笑 【联系方式】@dhfdgye 【验证留名】H 【验证日期】10.9 【上课价位】7p 【人照几分】10 【服务过程） 这次的体验非常好，大概总结一下分享给各位狼友。她频道发的相片是本人无差。这个妹子身材确实是极品，跟她课表上写的一致，确实是又瘦胸又大，主要是胸还白，第一眼见就让人很有性欲，是真胸，不是做的。其他很多胸大的女孩子，要么是做的，要么身材微胖，但是她不是，她胸大但是身材很苗条，很轻盈，可以直接把她整个人抱起来站着做，姿势自己脑补。下面没有任何异味，舔起来也很舒服。下面挺紧而且她体质有点特殊，下面温度很高，插进去后小弟弟的感觉特别强烈，我也是第一次遇到这样体质的。不管是手感还是体感，都是非常舒服，我个人觉得非常值得推荐。所以回家之后就写报告 给大家推荐一下，毕竟独乐乐不如众乐乐😂。 支持匿名报告，匿名需要花费200积分隐藏ID。（积分多此举…
👍位置: #大朗 🤩艺名: #笑笑 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 🔠一节课700 🔠两节课1400 💝特色: #69 #性感 #舌吻 ✍️私聊: @dhfdgye ⌨️频道: https://t.me/djfneir ⚙️双向: @dhfdgyebot 📞（东莞学生会）📞 ✍️报告模版 💌报告投稿 ❤️（上榜联系）
Channel name was changed to «笑笑大朗学妹»
Channel created
Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @djfneir. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“笑笑大朗学妹” (@djfneir), 9 subscribers as measured 9 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/djfneir.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.