Channel
@yinlianqyl
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
92subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 6 October 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003284272073 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @yinlianqyl |
| Created | 13 December 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 6 October 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 29 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 29 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/yinlianqyl |
Hacking & security — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 23 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Oct 2026, 03:36 | 92 | -2 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 02:09 | 94 | -1 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 21:27 | 95 | +3 |
| 10 Oct 2026, 13:58 | 92 | +1 |
| 6 Oct 2026, 19:22 | 91 | no change |
| 6 Oct 2026, 18:48 | 91 | first reading |
3 posts held, back to 13 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 3 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 3 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 3 most recent posts we hold, published 13 December 2025 to 13 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🤔分类料性的角度与判断能力 三类料高风险： ▪️ 红料/特殊料：1.涉恐涉暴资金 2.军火 3.毒资 4.綁架 ▪️ 三黑料：1.公检法 2.上下級 3.财务单 4.科技单 5.盗刷料/同步 6.国际精聊科技/海外公检 ▪️ 高料技：1.AI ▪️小三黑：1.盒饭/红酒/建材 2.三黑以外冒充公职人员 ▪️大混常规以上盒饭以下：1.小学生料 2.冒充亲朋好友 3.机票/门票 4.培训/学费/驾照 5.游戏 6.跨境电商 7.明星料 8.换汇单 9.其他小众料类型 10.标准大混-小贷 11.标准大混-淘宝退款 ▪️大混常规之间 ：1.六合彩料 ▪️小混/常规：1.裸聊/色敲 2.色刷/兼职刷单 3.上门空降嫖娼 4.色料/纯色 ▪️常规色刷的分类：1.约炮色刷. 2.春药色刷 3.空際/约炮料性认知争议 二类料中等风险： ◽️理财资金 : 1.精聊 2.大区 3.配资 4.反波胆 5.资金盘短盘 6.资金盘…
❤1
这是一个汇聚国内支付人才，与灰产大佬相结合的一个资源圈，欢迎学习，一起进步！
Channel created
Showing the 3 most recent of 3 posts we hold for @yinlianqyl. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“钱引力 -「支付深耕社」” (@yinlianqyl), 92 subscribers as measured 29 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yinlianqyl.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.