Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

⋅˚₊‧ ୨𝙬𝙤𝙧𝙡𝙙 𝙤𝙛 𝙮𝙞𝙞୧ ‧₊˚ ⋅

@yiimwh1

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

70subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002239135389
TypeChannel
Username@yiimwh1
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/yiimwh1

Growth

7011 Aug 2026, 17:46 — 70 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 09:53 — 70 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 17:4612 Aug 2026, 09:53
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 69–71 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 09:5370no change
11 Aug 2026, 17:4670first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 27 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
120.4%
avg views ÷ 70 subscribers
Avg views / post
84.3
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
18.0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 14 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held14 (27 June 20268 August 2026)
Views total590
Reactions total106
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Aug 2026, 17:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
8s
Average length
8s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

248 reactions across 14 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53437417106041962428534.3%
custom 53124225084340554226124.6%
custom 52985484884626922255522.2%
custom 54226632250218538412510.1%
custom 5397762477813414032145.65%
custom 522670018818109603183.23%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 248reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 27 June 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
76
across the posts below
Posts paid on
10
of 14 we hold a reading for · 71%
Most on one post
16
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @yiimwh1. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 June 2026 to 8 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 15:53 UTC28 views20 reactions10 Starsread 11 August 2026
Photo

🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀 #арт #bluelock

custom 53124225084340554228custom 53437417106041962425custom 53977624778134140324custom 52267001881810960311custom 52985484884626922251custom 54226632250218538411

7 Aug 2026, 17:57 UTC36 views1 reactions10 Starsread 11 August 2026

какую из твоих работ ты считаешь самой лучшей и красивой 🔤ообще, у меня нету прям-прям любимых, но вот мой топ: • https://t.me/yiimwh1/259 • https://t.me/yiimwh1/236?single • https://t.me/yiimwh1/194 • https://t.me/yiimwh1/192 • https://t.me/yiimwh1/142

custom 52985484884626922251

7 Aug 2026, 13:15 UTC37 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 какие у тебя фав худы в блюлок фд? И кто самый самый фав 🔤ообще, у меня очень много любимых художников, но наверное самые любимые — Маечка и Кимка, если брать ру фд. Еще и кикиро нравится и нури. А если в твиттере и в тик токе, то вот. Это конечно не все, потому что я треть найти не могу🥹🥹 Список очень большой будет, если я правда буду все перечислять, так что 😢😢 привет, ты за конора или хабиба. 🔤 не разб

custom 52985484884626922251

7 Aug 2026, 10:08 UTC36 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026

🔤авайте проведем сегодня анон тайм🌸 ( Если что, я соберу небольшое количество и все сразу выложу)

custom 52985484884626922254

2 Aug 2026, 07:37 UTC68 views26 reactions10 Starsread 11 August 2026
Photo

🔤🔤 🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🔤 🔤🔤егодня уже 2 августа и у меня наступил день рождения! 🤩 ⠀🔤очти 2 года я веду этот канал и я очень рада вновь встретить такой праздник с вами. 🥺 Спасибо вам за реакции, комментарии и репосты моих работ. Мне очень приятно это всегда видеть. 🔤🔤уду рада, если сегодня вы тоже поставите реакцию на какую-нибудь картиночку и хорошо проведете день🤍

custom 534374171060419624213custom 52985484884626922257custom 52267001881810960316

22 Jul 2026, 15:48 UTC133 views24 reactions6 Starsread 11 August 2026
Photo

• Я нарисовала гифт моей подруне с Занкой👅 #арт #gachiakuta

custom 529854848846269222514custom 53437417106041962424custom 53977624778134140324custom 53124225084340554221custom 54226632250218538411

17 Jul 2026, 18:17 UTC252 views30 reactions16 Starsread 11 August 2026
Photo

—𝐻𝑒𝓎, 𝒜𝓃𝑔𝑒𝓁🌌 #арт #14dwy

custom 534374171060419624216custom 53124225084340554227custom 54226632250218538416custom 53977624778134140321

15 Jul 2026, 11:45 UTC133 views23 reactions6 Starsread 11 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

custom 542266322502185384112custom 53437417106041962426custom 53124225084340554225

13 Jul 2026, 11:01 UTC131 views25 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Небольшой спидран Рена #арт #скетч #14dwy

custom 529854848846269222513custom 53124225084340554227custom 53437417106041962425

6 Jul 2026, 10:02 UTC208 views18 reactions6 Starsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Моя первая атака на артфайте для poor-quality (если по ссылке не переходит , то это ник девочки, по нему можно ее найти на артфайте)👅 #арт Спасибо за звездочки 🥺

custom 531242250843405542210custom 53437417106041962424custom 54226632250218538413custom 52267001881810960311

4 Jul 2026, 13:02 UTC135 views17 reactions10 Starsread 11 August 2026

Блин, я щас заметила, что вас 71 🥹, мне очень приятно видеть эту циферку и спасибо, что следите за моим контентом, его будет еще больше и буду очень сильно стараться, чтобы был и сильно лучше

custom 531242250843405542213custom 53437417106041962424

4 Jul 2026, 12:11 UTC139 views13 reactions1 Starread 11 August 2026
Photo

Ребята, если кто-то участвует в этом году в артфайте! То у меня там тоже есть профиль👅 #щп

custom 534374171060419624210custom 53977624778134140323

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @yiimwh1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 498,554 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“⋅˚₊‧ ୨𝙬𝙤𝙧𝙡𝙙 𝙤𝙛 𝙮𝙞𝙞୧ ‧₊˚ ⋅” (@yiimwh1), 70 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yiimwh1.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.