Channel
@yida_lafei
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
40subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002568803717 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @yida_lafei |
| Created | 7 July 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/yida_lafei |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 11:56 | 40 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 01:01 | 40 | first reading |
5 posts held, back to 7 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 5 (7 July 2025 – 3 August 2026) |
| Views total | 8 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 01:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2025 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
✯ 泰 达 ✯ 拉菲13已开户 平台/个人 活动奖励一步到位 8.5号正式开业 注册链接： https://888.tdyule62.com/reg/BPR8UM ➤ 国內线路： https://666.tdyule8444.com https://666.tdyule4141.com https://666.tdyule9289.com https://666.tdyule6443.com https://666.tdyule5451.com ➤ 海外线路： https://888.tdyule62.com https://888.tdyule19.com https://888.tdyule06.com https://888.tdyule66.com https://888.tdyule49.com ➤ 专用线路： https://tddir.tdyule55.com https://tddir.…
拉菲12 益达 已开放注册（不删档） 10.22号上午9点 正式开业 注册链接： https://888.ydyule818.com/reg/4KW593 注册链接2： https://888.ydyule818.com/reg/EJ9ZE1 ➤ 国內线路： https://888.ydyule00.com https://888.ydyule22.com https://888.ydyule44.com https://888.ydyule01.com https://888.ydyule23.com ➤ 海外线路： https://666.ydyule55.com https://666.ydyule11.com https://666.ydyule33.com https://666.ydyule77.com https://666.ydyule99.com ➤ 专用线路： https://yddir.y…
❤1
拉菲12《益达》预留开启 益达通知： 我们始终相信，「好的开始，值得等待」 因应新平台益达制度架构与功能模组较为复杂，我们希望以更完善、更流畅的体验与大家见面。为确保整体系统稳定与服务品质，我们决定延后一周开业，感谢理解与配合！ 排程调整如下： 2025/10/20 15:00 开放注册（不删档） 2025/10/22 09:00 正式开业（开放充提) -------------------------------------------------------------- ➡️【招商经理】 @jingli158 ➡️【平台目录】 @pingtai66 ➡️【计划下载】 @jihua99
拉菲12《益达》预留开启 开业行程安排： 10/13 15：00 开放注册（不删档） 10/15 9：00 正式开业（开放充提） 开业活动： 1.盈利竞赛争夺35万奖金（开业当天） 第1名 100000 第2名 60000 第3名 30000 第4名 15000 第5名 10000 第6名 9000 第7名 8000 第8名 7000 第9名 6000 第10名 5000 第11名-20名 4000 第21名-30名 3000 第31名-40名 2000 第41名-50名 1000 2.开业后前三天充值送１％ 3.开业后第一周每天发放 66666 红包 新增项目 1.TRX 能量租赁与快速闪兑 2.支持 Telegram 连动登入 3.提供 Telegram 专业飞单软件 4.全新彩种上线： 福体彩、福彩双色球、福彩七乐彩、体彩七星彩、体彩超…
Channel created
Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @yida_lafei. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 201,789 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“益达开业通知 益达网址 益达注册 益达注册地址 益达登录地址 益达登录网址 益达手机app益达app 益达挂机软件@yida” (@yida_lafei), 40 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yida_lafei.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.