Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 小羽的后花园🐰

Channel

小羽的后花园🐰

@yhsjsgi

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

500subscribers

+225 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004406134053
TypeChannel
Username@yhsjsgi
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 21 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 September 2026
Last confirmed live14 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/yhsjsgi

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 57% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

275500387.512 August 2026 — 275 subscribers13 August 2026 — 293 subscribers20 August 2026 — 372 subscribers28 August 2026 — 432 subscribers6 September 2026 — 451 subscribers11 September 2026 — 451 subscribers14 September 2026 — 500 subscribers12 August 202614 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 33 days, net +225. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 241–534 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Sept 2026, 15:39500+49
11 Sept 2026, 23:22451no change
6 Sept 2026, 05:38451+19
28 Aug 2026, 01:54432+60
20 Aug 2026, 02:05372+79
13 Aug 2026, 08:15293+18
12 Aug 2026, 22:58275first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 21 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
90.1%
avg views ÷ 500 subscribers
Avg views / post
451
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.355%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 6 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 September 2026
Posts held20 (21 July 202611 September 2026)
Views total2,704
Reactions total1
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Sept 2026, 23:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
19s
Average length
6s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

17 reactions across 9 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 88.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1588.2%
👀15.88%
🔥15.88%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 17 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 11 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Sept 2026, 08:33 UTC282 views1 reactionsread 11 September 2026

我在杭州御女阁免费上榜啦,群内氛围轻松,不强制做活动,永久上榜! 👑👑认准Telegram官方认证防伪标志 👑 超多好看的小姐姐都在这里上榜!💖💖💖 https://t.me/hangzhou_777

1

19 Aug 2026, 13:31 UTC≈1,590 views1 reactionsread 11 September 2026

杭州星巴克:https://t.me/hzxbk 评分(下方仅留一项): #好评(80分-94分) 【出击时间】:8月18日 【出击老师】:#小羽 【联系方式】:@telas88 【出击留名】:八十四 【开课位置】:西湖区 【修车水费】:工兵p 【人照评分满分10】:9分(人照相似度/妆容) 【颜值评分满分20】:18分(高颜值/不错/耐看) 【身材评分满分10】:9分(皮肤/身材/罩杯) 【吊感评分满分20】:18分(户型/紧度/水量/包裹感) 【服务评分满分10】:9分(职业化/三件套/女友感) 【态度评分满分20】:19分(主动询问/自觉服务/自己动手) 【环境评分满分10】:9分(日租房/公寓/高档小区) 【综合评分满分100】:91分(以上相加) 【过程描述】:有的打✅ 舌吻 ✅ 口活 ✅ 69舔穴 ✅ 毒龙 【流程小文】(最少200)(不予收录ai报告,优先小黄文) 进门看见老师170的身

1

18 Aug 2026, 12:24 UTC≈1,340 views2 reactionsread 11 September 2026
Forwarded from @qjtgb

#杭州肯德基 https://t.me/kdjqjt #好评 80-100 #中好评 65-80 #差评 0-65 【出击时间】:8月15日 【出击老师】:西湖小羽 【联系方式】:@telas88 【出击留名】:WC 【开课位置】:钱塘ONE 【修车水费】:工兵PP 【人照评分满分10】:8.5(人照8分分相似) 【颜值评分满分20】:17(耐看型) 【身材评分满分10】:7(170,110,北方女孩骨架大) 【吊感评分满分20】:18(一线天,较紧,) 【服务评分满分10】:7(基本都会) 【态度评分满分20】:17(除三件套外需主动询问) 【环境评分满分10】:)8(公寓) 【综合评分满分100】:81.5(以上相加) 情绪价值描述: 【过程描述】:有的打✅ 舌吻 ✅化妆了只能浅吻 口活 ✅ 69舔穴 没做,需要自己提 毒龙 🈚️ 【过程描述】:过程小黄文(200字以上) 兑换成功后联系老师,得知老师刚刚

2

12 Aug 2026, 10:53 UTC≈1,810 views1 reactionsread 11 September 2026
Photo

宝宝们 今天稍微开的比较晚 现在有空可以预约

🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @yhsjsgi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“小羽的后花园🐰” (@yhsjsgi), 500 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yhsjsgi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.