Channel
@yfycucgugivi
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
557subscribers
+407 since we began measuring on 20 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004393442795 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @yfycucgugivi |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 18 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 20 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/yfycucgugivi |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Sept 2026, 08:01 | 557 | +71 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 17:42 | 486 | +132 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 10:48 | 354 | +185 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 01:52 | 169 | +19 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 16:30 | 150 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 18 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 12 (18 August 2026 – 20 August 2026) |
| Views total | 4,718 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 20 Aug 2026, 16:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 18 August 2026 to 20 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
【群组】：西安品茗茶园春色 【时间】：2026-08-20 【老师】：苏烬娆 【留名】：匿名 【颜值身材】：9 【接待态度】：10 【服务技能】：9.8 【综合评分】：9.6【过程】：老师是东北妹子，口音比较重，不过影响不大，首先老师不是那种很惊艳的颜值但是很耐看，越看越漂亮，身材也很好，胸真的很大，然后就是老师态度确实很好，递水，帮忙点烟（弄得我都不好意思了），制服也比较多，可以任意挑选，服务很认真，过程就不说了，反正很赞，后来老师说有三通，奈何二弟不努力，下次来体验，值得推荐
今天🈵课 哥哥们 约明天
【评价等级】: 👍 好评 【日 期】: 2026-08-20 【验 证 人】: ppt阿珂 【美女昵称】: 苏烬娆 【地 区】: 未央区 【人照得分】: 9 【颜值得分】: 9 【身材得分】:9 【服务得分】: 9 【态度得分】: 9 【环境得分】: 9 【综合得分】: 9 【年 龄】: 二十一 【凶 器】: 大概C➕ 【服务过程】: 刚下海的苏烬娆妹子，开门就感觉如沐春风，🐍一会抱一下，就好像自己的小女友。鸳鸯浴有水中萧伺候，有点忍不住就赶紧叫停。床上背面过水做得不紧不慢的，正面指划漫游也不敷衍。边做边和你聊天，叨叨的好像许久没见的，有很多话想和你说，情绪价值简直拉满。口活无齿感，会关心你感受，哪舒服就特别照顾。正题的时候，更是水帘洞，水汪汪一大片，噗呲噗呲很爽，把妹子也干得嗯嗯叫。然后换后入，先亲下白白的翘屁股，然后不客气咯，抱着滑嫩嫩的小腰，次次插到底，在一声声浪…
感谢哥哥们的认可
烬娆 会继续努力的
开课了
被哥哥这么一说，我有点飘了。
今天 烬娆 被哥哥包夜啦，宝子们约明天吧
烬娆 还有很多不足，会继续努力的，好评差评我都会发出来，接受批评，才能成长，欢迎西安的哥哥们，来指导 烬娆 进步
开课啦 宝子们 到西安的第一天
Photo, posted without a caption
❤1
苏烬娆de小屋 pinned a photo
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @yfycucgugivi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“苏烬娆de小屋” (@yfycucgugivi), 557 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yfycucgugivi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.